It is pointless....but go on...I agree with you that your argument was purely subjective, which means that could never be anything but a pissing match. It make a good introduction to the point that polygamy has a much more "widespread" history than homosexual marriage, though.
Huh? SSM was not based on religious argument. Try and apply your response to the quote...OK?We saw how this worked with homosexual marriage.
No, it is NOT, which is why it was outlawed....and just to note, you are getting close to admitting it was "widespread".Polygamy is a more tried and true marital model than homosexual marriage.
And yet you continue to fail to recognize the basis of the arguments (social v religious) and the differences that it negatively impacts heterosexual marriage. It is a strike AGAINST monogamy.It's a no-brainer that it's going to be the next challenge once homosexuals have achieved homosexual marriage in all 50 states.