So, endgame...Who here thinks that when all the court cases are finally resolved, it will work something like this: states can marry who they want, and not marry who they want. However, they cannot fail to recognize marriages performed in any state. That should manage to piss off pretty much every one, but does seem most likely entirely constitutional.
I'm quoting history, which is reflected in the bible on this issue. Are you pretending polygamy didn't exist in Europe up until the medieval period (and beyond in Asia). Pitiful.You're going to cite the Bible as your argument against polygamy? Seriously?
Wow, your true biases have come out. Glad I was able to force you to disclose them. Your brain on homophobia.Not any more than homosexuality lends itself to abusing children. This argument has no bearing on marriage between consenting adults (like brother and sister, father and daughter, daughter and daughter, mother and son, etc. etc. etc.).
I see you are a compendium of misinformation about sexual orientation, a common tea party condition.
You are mistaken in the homophobia. I'm not suggesting that homosexuality encourages pedophilia. I'm rejecting your suggestion that incest does any more than homosexuality does. Parents abusing their children isn't a product of their incestuous desire, but the incest is a result of their abusive desire.
You failed to address this point by joaquin.