Page 43 of 43 FirstFirst ... 33414243
Results 421 to 429 of 429

Thread: US Supreme Court strikes down voting rights act clause

  1. #421
    Freedom Fighter
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Utopia
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 08:18 PM
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    967

    Re: US Supreme Court strikes down voting rights act clause

    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    You mean those racist bastards let black folks go to the DMV 5 days a week?!?
    You and I know the deal about voter ID's.

    Felons and illegals can't get them.

  2. #422
    Traveler

    Jack Hays's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Williamsburg, Virginia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:27 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    54,933
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: US Supreme Court strikes down voting rights act clause

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post
    Less race-based election tampering, yes. The VRA stops the government from doing that sort of thing. You probably don't realize it, but you're arguing for more government interference. Shouldn't you be against that? Or is it ok for local government to suppress the votes of minorities?
    Basically, I don't believe there is any longer a problem. I don't believe your examples.
    "It's always reassuring to find you've made the right enemies." -- William J. Donovan

  3. #423
    Sage
    apdst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bagdad, La.
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:27 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    76,578

    Re: US Supreme Court strikes down voting rights act clause

    Quote Originally Posted by jwzg View Post
    You and I know the deal about voter ID's.

    Felons and illegals can't get them.
    You nailed, bro.
    Quote Originally Posted by Top Cat View Post
    At least Bill saved his transgressions for grown women. Not suggesting what he did was OK. But he didn't chase 14 year olds.

  4. #424
    Outer space potato man

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:29 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    51,849

    Re: US Supreme Court strikes down voting rights act clause

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Hays View Post
    Basically, I don't believe there is any longer a problem. I don't believe your examples.
    Are you suggesting Ruth Bader Ginsburg is a liar?

    31 measures have been rejected since the 2006 renewal.
    Last edited by Deuce; 07-07-13 at 05:42 PM.
    He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear
    Quote Originally Posted by Lutherf View Post
    We’ll say what? Something like “nothing happened” ... Yeah, we might say something like that.

  5. #425
    Sage
    Fisher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Last Seen
    12-06-13 @ 02:44 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    17,002

    Re: US Supreme Court strikes down voting rights act clause

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post
    Are you suggesting Ruth Bader Ginsburg is a liar?
    Yes. If more blacks supported republicans then you would not see republicans targeting blacks. It is about partisan power not racism.

  6. #426
    Outer space potato man

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:29 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    51,849

    Re: US Supreme Court strikes down voting rights act clause

    Quote Originally Posted by Fisher View Post
    Yes. If more blacks supported republicans then you would not see republicans targeting blacks. It is about partisan power not racism.
    ....

    Holy ****.

    I want you to clarify for me: Do you support gutting the VRA, then?
    Last edited by Deuce; 07-07-13 at 05:50 PM.
    He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear
    Quote Originally Posted by Lutherf View Post
    We’ll say what? Something like “nothing happened” ... Yeah, we might say something like that.

  7. #427
    Traveler

    Jack Hays's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Williamsburg, Virginia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:27 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    54,933
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: US Supreme Court strikes down voting rights act clause

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post
    Are you suggesting Ruth Bader Ginsburg is a liar?

    31 measures have been rejected since the 2006 renewal.
    I'm suggesting there's no real problem.
    "It's always reassuring to find you've made the right enemies." -- William J. Donovan

  8. #428
    Outer space potato man

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:29 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    51,849

    Re: US Supreme Court strikes down voting rights act clause

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Hays View Post
    I'm suggesting there's no real problem.
    In like 2003 one guy tried to straight-up cancel elections right after black people became a majority in a particular district. 31 rejections since the 2006 renewal. Numerous redistricting attempts that obviously are aimed along racial lines.

    "No real problem."

    At least you're not sitting here telling me that singling out black people for disenfranchisement is ok as long as the motivation is partisanism and not racism. So, it could be worse.
    He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear
    Quote Originally Posted by Lutherf View Post
    We’ll say what? Something like “nothing happened” ... Yeah, we might say something like that.

  9. #429
    Traveler

    Jack Hays's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Williamsburg, Virginia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 06:27 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    54,933
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: US Supreme Court strikes down voting rights act clause

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post
    In like 2003 one guy tried to straight-up cancel elections right after black people became a majority in a particular district. 31 rejections since the 2006 renewal. Numerous redistricting attempts that obviously are aimed along racial lines.

    "No real problem."

    At least you're not sitting here telling me that singling out black people for disenfranchisement is ok as long as the motivation is partisanism and not racism. So, it could be worse.
    I just think your examples are bogus.
    "It's always reassuring to find you've made the right enemies." -- William J. Donovan

Page 43 of 43 FirstFirst ... 33414243

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •