Page 13 of 43 FirstFirst ... 3111213141523 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 130 of 429

Thread: US Supreme Court strikes down voting rights act clause

  1. #121
    Pragmatist
    AlabamaPaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Alabama
    Last Seen
    12-08-17 @ 11:17 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    8,834

    Re: US Supreme Court strikes down voting rights act clause

    Quote Originally Posted by Unitedwestand13 View Post
    Why would anyone be against requiring an ID to participate in our election process?
    I don't often change my signature, but this was just too over the top to let anyone forget with what this country is up against...
    Quote Originally Posted by James D Hill View Post
    I am for gay marriage because it ticks off Jesus freaks and social conservatives. Gays are also good voters because the vote for my side so I fight next to them.

  2. #122
    Mixed Government advocate
    Master PO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    93,000,000 miles from Earth where its very Hot
    Last Seen
    11-30-17 @ 01:52 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    31,331

    Re: US Supreme Court strikes down voting rights act clause

    Quote Originally Posted by NIMBY View Post
    because those you have mentioned broke the law--now Texas will continue their 27-9 gerry-mandered House map and ensure a Republican minority will be in power--true fascism--the South has risen again throught the SCOTUS CORRUPTUS and ensures the division in this Country will accelerate
    tell me if some states broke the law, can the congress violate the constitution then, in what they determine to fix the problem

  3. #123
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Last Seen
    09-08-13 @ 02:07 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    2,655

    Re: US Supreme Court strikes down voting rights act clause

    Quote Originally Posted by AlabamaPaul View Post
    You know, a new schtick would benefit your postings...
    Did you see the poster's question? Schtick? Paul, I'm afraid that you will continue to downplay the role race plays in our society until the day you die, but I'll do the same only when I see good reason to ... but don't call it a schtick ... that's insensitive to the people affected by it ...

  4. #124
    Sage


    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    IL
    Last Seen
    Today @ 04:38 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    36,837

    Re: US Supreme Court strikes down voting rights act clause

    If you can't win at the ballot box, ...... Maybe it is time to let these people go.
    Quote Originally Posted by Unitedwestand13 View Post

  5. #125
    Pragmatist
    AlabamaPaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Alabama
    Last Seen
    12-08-17 @ 11:17 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    8,834

    Re: US Supreme Court strikes down voting rights act clause

    Quote Originally Posted by windowdressing View Post
    Did you see the poster's question? Schtick? Paul, I'm afraid that you will continue to downplay the role race plays in our society until the day you die, but I'll do the same only when I see good reason to ... but don't call it a schtick ... that's insensitive to the people affected by it ...
    I do not downplay anything, and I don't use it as an excuse either...
    I don't often change my signature, but this was just too over the top to let anyone forget with what this country is up against...
    Quote Originally Posted by James D Hill View Post
    I am for gay marriage because it ticks off Jesus freaks and social conservatives. Gays are also good voters because the vote for my side so I fight next to them.

  6. #126
    Mixed Government advocate
    Master PO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    93,000,000 miles from Earth where its very Hot
    Last Seen
    11-30-17 @ 01:52 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    31,331

    Re: US Supreme Court strikes down voting rights act clause

    Quote Originally Posted by NIMBY View Post
    state powers such as Indiana polluting Lake Michigan at 20 times the MERCURY level--these are states' wrongs not states' rights
    i never say rights...states dont have rights...they have powers only....rights are indicative of flesh and blood people only.

    the founders state the federal government duties are few and defined, ..were state powers is vast.....as the constitution confirms this.

  7. #127
    Sage


    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    IL
    Last Seen
    Today @ 04:38 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    36,837

    Re: US Supreme Court strikes down voting rights act clause

    Why did Madison call the Constitutional Convention together in thew first place? To deal with its 13 petulant children and, for example, their 9 separate Navies and huge debts.
    Quote Originally Posted by ernst barkmann View Post
    tell me if some states broke the law, can the congress violate the constitution then, in what they determine to fix the problem

  8. #128
    Sage


    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    IL
    Last Seen
    Today @ 04:38 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    36,837

    Re: US Supreme Court strikes down voting rights act clause

    Even if true, we're only over 300,000,000 people and 224 years later. You should be chuckling at this example of judicial activism, since it pleases your federalist beliefs.
    Quote Originally Posted by ernst barkmann View Post
    i never say rights...states dont have rights...they have powers only....rights are indicative of flesh and blood people only.

    the founders state the federal government duties are few and defined, ..were state powers is vast.....as the constitution confirms this.

  9. #129
    Sage
    Unitedwestand13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Sunnyvale California
    Last Seen
    12-14-17 @ 05:44 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    14,985

    Re: US Supreme Court strikes down voting rights act clause

    Quote Originally Posted by AlabamaPaul View Post
    Why would anyone be against requiring an ID to participate in our election process?
    people who think that some of the requirements being asked by the Texas voter I.d bill are down right absurd, like a gun license is vaild but not a student i.d.

    http://www.brennancenter.org/sites/d...rID_083012.pdf

    (this link is from 2012 so it is before this supreme court decision.)

  10. #130
    Sage


    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    IL
    Last Seen
    Today @ 04:38 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    36,837

    Re: US Supreme Court strikes down voting rights act clause

    Are you still for poll taxes, Paul? And changing voting times and all to help Republicans over Democrats? And having 50 states with 50 different rules affecting Federal elections. Of course you are. You still want 50 separate countries.
    Quote Originally Posted by AlabamaPaul View Post
    Why would anyone be against requiring an ID to participate in our election process?

Page 13 of 43 FirstFirst ... 3111213141523 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •