Page 2 of 12 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 115

Thread: Climate talk shifts from curbing CO2 to adapting

  1. #11
    Sage
    longview's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 07:02 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    14,323

    Re: Climate talk shifts from curbing CO2 to adapting

    Quote Originally Posted by tererun View Post
    Let me ask the question for the right since they are not able to put their true thoughts into words due to cowardice. Why the hell should we care? Seriously, it is quite inconvenient to give a damn about future problems old white people will not have to face. A few decades from now they will be dead anyway. Even if they are not they will be pissing themselves and trying to remember their own names. They are not teenagers and they face death much sooner than the youth of today. Those are those youthful kids they hate so damned much anyway for supporting gays, blacks, immigrants, and any other god forsaken group that happens to just want to live. It is what those kids deserve for not running to their party anyway. So why not live it up now? They will not have to face the future. I am sure god will handle it because he seems to be really up on granting wishes and saving people.

    So stop pestering the right about this. It is not an issue that effects them. They have no concern about their actions, and they live purely for their own gratification at the expense of others. It is terribly bothersome for you to guilt them about the future of a world they will never see.
    Come on Tererun, don't sugar coat it, tell us what you really think.
    Seriously, do you really think that just because someone is older, they do not care about
    what kind of world they leave behind?
    One of the cornerstones of good behavior, is that if you borrow something, return it in as good
    or better shape then when you received it. It counts for the the little things and the big ones (earth).
    If people are passionate about resisting much of the proposed regulation, maybe it is because,
    it would not help, or help so little as to not be worth the effort.
    A real solution will be one that people choose, because it saves them money,
    if it happens to be good for the environment, thats a win win.

  2. #12
    Outer space potato man

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:15 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    51,775

    Re: Climate talk shifts from curbing CO2 to adapting

    Quote Originally Posted by Zyphlin View Post
    This.

    Man made or not man made is beyond the point to me. The reality is that our entire structure in this country is too ingrained with fossil fuels to make any true sizable shift from it in any type of recent future, and you have multiple emerging countries like China and India who are going to be latching onto Fossil Fuels in a major way. Even with a fairly "swift" change on the part of the U.S., say 10 years, it's still unlikely to have any significant impact even if "Man" is the primary element causing the warming.

    Is it wrong or bad to ENCOURAGE and PROMOTE "Green Energy" and a move away from fossil fuels? Absolutely not. But attempting to massively legislate and regulate it and make it a primary focus is like trying to put ones finger into a hole in a dike while the water level is set to go over top of the wall anyways.

    One of the greatest features of the Human Race is our ability to adapt to our environment. As much, if not more, focus needs to be on responding to that and helping adapt.

    There was a technology that was in the news some years back. A group had been working on cement that could "eat" CO2 emissions. Another was working on using insects and/or bacteria to process waste into crude oil. These are great types of technology that could massively help in the future while keeping out infastructure from needing a radical rework...but they're things largely ignored becuase it's not been about adapting, it's not been about realism, it's about a slavish adherence to a notion of "Green".
    No, they're largely ignored because there's a crowd of people who absolutely flip their **** when you suggest anything that might be one penny more expensive for the glorious, sacred job creators.

    Digging up pre-made hydrocarbons is cheaper and easier than making them ourselves. And God forbid we do anything that might hurt profit margins. YER KILLIN JERBS!
    He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear
    Quote Originally Posted by Lutherf View Post
    We’ll say what? Something like “nothing happened” ... Yeah, we might say something like that.

  3. #13
    Sage
    longview's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 07:02 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    14,323

    Re: Climate talk shifts from curbing CO2 to adapting

    Quote Originally Posted by Deuce View Post
    No, they're largely ignored because there's a crowd of people who absolutely flip their **** when you suggest anything that might be one penny more expensive for the glorious, sacred job creators.

    Digging up pre-made hydrocarbons is cheaper and easier than making them ourselves. And God forbid we do anything that might hurt profit margins. YER KILLIN JERBS!
    There is a realization coming, the organic hydrocarbons are a large but finite supply,
    without which four out five people will starve to death.
    One of my issues, is that I don't think most of the regulations proposed would change
    much of anything,other than restricting freedom, and generating more tax revenue.
    Most people are selfish, and will follow the path of least resistance.

  4. #14
    Sage
    DDD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Republic of Dardania
    Last Seen
    05-06-17 @ 06:00 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    12,173

    Re: Climate talk shifts from curbing CO2 to adapting

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenton View Post
    That's ridiculous.

    Never going to happen, never going to be feasable, and if they were truly concerned about CO2 emissions they would have embrased Hydrogen Fuel Cell technology instead of loading up Obama's buddies with Billions so their green energy fronts could fail, and they could pocket the change.
    I agree.

    But, I would not mind freeing pockets in various depths of earths crust of dino-fuel if this technology would be available. This along with hydrogen cells of course.

    I sometimes imagine that perhaps it was meant to be for us to find ways to burn dino-fossil-fuels so as to un-trap their souls free into the air. This global climate change may be a cause of dinosaur ghost aggression still alive after all those years
    Quote Originally Posted by poweRob View Post
    Stats come out and always show life getting better. News makes money in making you think its not.
    The Republic of Dardania is the proper name for: http://www.debatepolitics.com/europe...ification.html

  5. #15
    Sage
    Fenton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:59 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    26,244

    Re: Climate talk shifts from curbing CO2 to adapting

    Quote Originally Posted by DDD View Post
    I agree.


    But, I would not mind freeing pockets in various depths of earths crust of dino-fuel if this technology would be available. This along with hydrogen cells of course.

    I sometimes imagine that perhaps it was meant to be for us to find ways to burn dino-fossil-fuels so as to un-trap their souls free into the air. This global climate change may be a cause of dinosaur ghost aggression still alive after all those years
    The alternative energy agenda has been destroyed by the left politicizing and manipulation.

    The best idea's, the most feasable and dependable are the result of real demand addressed with private freedom.

    The push for inneffecient and expensive and not eco-friendly solar and battery power rose out of the false claims, demagogy and doom of the left wing agenda.

    Too much CO2 and we must do something NOW, including you paying us more of your hard earned money.

    Future Fusion reactors, current fissile reactors and hydrogen fuel cell should be the obvious course, but again, the bureaucrats decided wasting billions and building cars no one wanted was the right choice.

  6. #16
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    The darkside of the moon
    Last Seen
    05-24-14 @ 05:56 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    4,905
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Climate talk shifts from curbing CO2 to adapting

    Quote Originally Posted by mpg View Post
    You see, that is a personal judgment you apply because you feel guilty. I did not say they were jerks for doing it, I just said they feel that way. They do not have to face the consequences of their living so it really does not matter to them. The problems of pollution will not get terrible enough that they cannot move to a new area that is cleaner during their lifetime. Sure it might suck for the ones trapped in cities with heavy pollution, or the coast, but there are tons of places to move to where pollution is low and the effects of climate change are not going to get drastic before they die anyway. I understand you feel guilty and insulted because your attitude may be seen as greedy and selfish by others, but what do you care? Those people don't matter as much as your gas guzzling car and old light bulbs anyway.

    Let us not beat around the Bush and pretend like you care. You do not have to. These problems will not be faced by you, and your life is more important to you than the future of some people you don't even know. If you feel guilty you can always pretend god will be there to save those people when things break. Just admit to it. Pollution exists and is only increasing. Therefor it is a problem in a finite world. You do not have to care because there is enough for you to live your life out without too much problem. If that makes you feel a little crappy about yourself, that is your judgment.

  7. #17
    Outer space potato man

    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:15 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    51,775

    Re: Climate talk shifts from curbing CO2 to adapting

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenton View Post
    The alternative energy agenda has been destroyed by the left politicizing and manipulation.

    The best idea's, the most feasable and dependable are the result of real demand addressed with private freedom.

    The push for inneffecient and expensive and not eco-friendly solar and battery power rose out of the false claims, demagogy and doom of the left wing agenda.

    Too much CO2 and we must do something NOW, including you paying us more of your hard earned money.

    Future Fusion reactors, current fissile reactors and hydrogen fuel cell should be the obvious course, but again, the bureaucrats decided wasting billions and building cars no one wanted was the right choice.
    Private industry gravitates towards the cheaper option. This is rarely the cleaner option.
    He touched her over her bra and underpants, she says, and guided her hand to touch him over his underwear
    Quote Originally Posted by Lutherf View Post
    We’ll say what? Something like “nothing happened” ... Yeah, we might say something like that.

  8. #18
    Sage
    Boo Radley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Last Seen
    11-22-17 @ 04:22 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    36,858

    Re: Climate talk shifts from curbing CO2 to adapting

    Quote Originally Posted by Zyphlin View Post
    This.

    Man made or not man made is beyond the point to me. The reality is that our entire structure in this country is too ingrained with fossil fuels to make any true sizable shift from it in any type of recent future, and you have multiple emerging countries like China and India who are going to be latching onto Fossil Fuels in a major way. Even with a fairly "swift" change on the part of the U.S., say 10 years, it's still unlikely to have any significant impact even if "Man" is the primary element causing the warming.

    Is it wrong or bad to ENCOURAGE and PROMOTE "Green Energy" and a move away from fossil fuels? Absolutely not. But attempting to massively legislate and regulate it and make it a primary focus is like trying to put ones finger into a hole in a dike while the water level is set to go over top of the wall anyways.

    One of the greatest features of the Human Race is our ability to adapt to our environment. As much, if not more, focus needs to be on responding to that and helping adapt.

    There was a technology that was in the news some years back. A group had been working on cement that could "eat" CO2 emissions. Another was working on using insects and/or bacteria to process waste into crude oil. These are great types of technology that could massively help in the future while keeping out infastructure from needing a radical rework...but they're things largely ignored becuase it's not been about adapting, it's not been about realism, it's about a slavish adherence to a notion of "Green".
    You're a reason fellow and I always like reading your posts, but slavish works both ways. There's also a slavish adherence to the notion that continuing any way we want to is fine as there is no problem.

    AUSTAN GOOLSBEE: I think the world vests too much power, certainly in the president, probably in Washington in general for its influence on the economy, because most all of the economy has nothing to do with the government.

  9. #19
    Sage
    mpg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Milford, CT
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 06:13 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    7,769

    Re: Climate talk shifts from curbing CO2 to adapting

    Quote Originally Posted by tererun View Post
    You see, that is a personal judgment you apply because you feel guilty. I did not say they were jerks for doing it, I just said they feel that way. They do not have to face the consequences of their living so it really does not matter to them. The problems of pollution will not get terrible enough that they cannot move to a new area that is cleaner during their lifetime. Sure it might suck for the ones trapped in cities with heavy pollution, or the coast, but there are tons of places to move to where pollution is low and the effects of climate change are not going to get drastic before they die anyway. I understand you feel guilty and insulted because your attitude may be seen as greedy and selfish by others, but what do you care? Those people don't matter as much as your gas guzzling car and old light bulbs anyway.

    Let us not beat around the Bush and pretend like you care. You do not have to. These problems will not be faced by you, and your life is more important to you than the future of some people you don't even know. If you feel guilty you can always pretend god will be there to save those people when things break. Just admit to it. Pollution exists and is only increasing. Therefor it is a problem in a finite world. You do not have to care because there is enough for you to live your life out without too much problem. If that makes you feel a little crappy about yourself, that is your judgment.
    Ideally, people in this thread would only talk about climate change and what to do about it. Typically, people on this site talk about the topic at hand AND attack each other. You've chosen to attack only, and you've made incredibly specific accusations about someone who you know nothing about. You may as well accuse me of torturing Siamese kittens and 9 1/2 week old Beagle puppies.
    Last edited by mpg; 06-22-13 at 01:52 AM.
    If you expect people to be rational, you aren't being rational.

  10. #20
    Sage
    Boo Radley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Last Seen
    11-22-17 @ 04:22 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    36,858

    Re: Climate talk shifts from curbing CO2 to adapting

    Quote Originally Posted by mpg View Post
    Ideally, people in this thread would only talk about climate change and what to do about it. Typically, people on this site talk about the topic at hand AND attack each other. You've chosen to attack only, and you've you've made incredibly specific accusations about someone who you know nothing about. You may as well accuse me of torturing Siamese kittens and 9 1/2 week old Beagle puppies.
    I'm ok with the kittens (hate cats), but not the puppies!!!

    AUSTAN GOOLSBEE: I think the world vests too much power, certainly in the president, probably in Washington in general for its influence on the economy, because most all of the economy has nothing to do with the government.

Page 2 of 12 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •