- Joined
- Mar 20, 2012
- Messages
- 22,704
- Reaction score
- 9,469
- Location
- okla-freakin-homa
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Progressive
Ok, so enlighten us all....What is the point of referring to a political opponent using a pejorative name to describe who you are talking about, after the man has admitted years ago his problem, receiving treatment for the problem, and being a success. If Limbaugh were some drug addled hooker, that got through rehab, and went on welfare roles for the rest of her life, she'd be a hero to you. But since you don't like political opponents, instead making an argument, you use vitriol, name calling, and childish simplistic crap to argue....You don't make any points, you just attack...That isn't debate, that is just plain immature.
He isn't a political opponent, he is a rabble rouser, an 'entertainer' when it suits the Radical Right, get it correct. what office has he held/run for an office/spoke at a convection? no he WAS held up as a leader until he jumped the shark and then quickly disavowed in public, but he is a 'conservatives' guilty little pleasure to hear him rant and bash in his self described 'Theater of the Absurd'... PT Barnham would be proud!
You leave out the 'before' to Oxcy Rush's story. He viciously attacked others for 'ducking' into rehab rather than take personal responsibility until HE got busted then he did the duck n cover routine... :roll:
In my first post, the half sentence American focused on I simply stated the pig never had an original idea and stole the 'theorem' from the Reagan years. American opened the door, I just responded. You 'conservatives' love to blame everyone BUT yourselves.
FYI I use Oxcy Rush the same way soooo many 'conservatives' use Hanoi Jane so deal with it.... :roll: