• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

China Is Reaping Biggest Benefits of Iraq Oil Boom

pbrauer

DP Veteran
Joined
Jun 6, 2010
Messages
25,394
Reaction score
7,208
Location
Oregon
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Liberal
Well if the war in Iraq was for oil we lost out because China in the biggest benefactor.

SUB-CHINAOIL-articleLarge.jpg


BAGHDAD — Since the American-led invasion of 2003, Iraq has become one of the world’s top oil producers, and China is now its biggest customer.

China already buys nearly half the oil that Iraq produces, nearly 1.5 million barrels a day, and is angling for an even bigger share, bidding for a stake now owned by Exxon Mobil in one of Iraq’s largest oil fields.

“The Chinese are the biggest beneficiary of this post-Saddam oil boom in Iraq,” said Denise Natali, a Middle East expert at the National Defense University in Washington. “They need energy, and they want to get into the market.”

Before the invasion, Iraq’s oil industry was sputtering, largely walled off from world markets by international sanctions against the government of Saddam Hussein, so his overthrow always carried the promise of renewed access to the country’s immense reserves. Chinese state-owned companies seized the opportunity, pouring more than $2 billion a year and hundreds of workers into Iraq, and just as important, showing a willingness to play by the new Iraqi government’s rules and to accept lower profits to win contracts.

“We lost out,” said Michael Makovsky, a former Defense Department official in the Bush administration who worked on Iraq oil policy. “The Chinese had nothing to do with the war, but from an economic standpoint they are benefiting from it, and our Fifth Fleet and air forces are helping to assure their supply.”

snip


http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/03/w...benefits-of-iraq-oil-boom.html?pagewanted=all
 
Should have made the war about oil and we should have taken it.
 
It just decreases pressure on another supplier. Picture all the oil in the world as one big bucket. It really doesnt matter where the oil comes from excpet for some transportation cost.
 
Well if the war in Iraq was for oil we lost out because China in the biggest benefactor.

SUB-CHINAOIL-articleLarge.jpg


BAGHDAD — Since the American-led invasion of 2003, Iraq has become one of the world’s top oil producers, and China is now its biggest customer.

China already buys nearly half the oil that Iraq produces, nearly 1.5 million barrels a day, and is angling for an even bigger share, bidding for a stake now owned by Exxon Mobil in one of Iraq’s largest oil fields.

“The Chinese are the biggest beneficiary of this post-Saddam oil boom in Iraq,” said Denise Natali, a Middle East expert at the National Defense University in Washington. “They need energy, and they want to get into the market.”

Before the invasion, Iraq’s oil industry was sputtering, largely walled off from world markets by international sanctions against the government of Saddam Hussein, so his overthrow always carried the promise of renewed access to the country’s immense reserves. Chinese state-owned companies seized the opportunity, pouring more than $2 billion a year and hundreds of workers into Iraq, and just as important, showing a willingness to play by the new Iraqi government’s rules and to accept lower profits to win contracts.

“We lost out,” said Michael Makovsky, a former Defense Department official in the Bush administration who worked on Iraq oil policy. “The Chinese had nothing to do with the war, but from an economic standpoint they are benefiting from it, and our Fifth Fleet and air forces are helping to assure their supply.”

snip


http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/03/w...benefits-of-iraq-oil-boom.html?pagewanted=all

I guess you could say the same thing about why we invaded Libya
 
Should have made the war about oil and we should have taken it.

China has taken your pork now. They bought over the world's biggest hog producer.
 
Frankly, I don't believe the war in Iraq ever was for oil.
 
What do you think it was for?

Sure as hell wasn't for oil, that I can testify to. Other then that, hell if I know why we went.
 
I dont know. I really dont, at the time I really thought it was about WMD. I dont think we ever go to war for anything as noble as ideology. I think it is simple greed of one sort or another. Lots of money in war with or without oil.
Political ideology.
 
Since the Iraqi oil fields came back online, China and France have dominated the contracts involved (let's note, Iraq far exceeded previous production a short time after the invasion). I've been saying this for years. It's nice that the fringe left is finally admitting such.
 
China has taken your pork now. They bought over the world's biggest hog producer.

Bacon runs my stomach. Not my truck. Big difference. Plus we can always farm here. We got plenty of space. Ever seen a map of the western US?
 
Since the Iraqi oil fields came back online, China and France have dominated the contracts involved (let's note, Iraq far exceeded previous production a short time after the invasion). I've been saying this for years. It's nice that the fringe left is finally admitting such.

Here are links to the 3 oil fields I found most easily. Apparently, China has its fingers in 2 out of 3 of them. Maybe there are more oil fields, I don't know.

Rumaila oil field - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Halfaya Field - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Majnoon oil field - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 
I guess you could say the same thing about why we invaded Libya

How many troops did we send to Libya for your "invasion"? We sent over 200,000 troops into Iraq. Over 4500 died there too.
 
How many troops did we send to Libya for your "invasion"? We sent over 200,000 troops into Iraq. Over 4500 died there too.

You miss the point, both were all about oil. Doesn't matter how many troops went where or how many plans when there.
 
You miss the point, both were all about oil. Doesn't matter how many troops went where or how many plans when there.

So Iraq was all about oil for China? Why would we do that?
 
I guess this destroys the idiocy of all those on the left who charged that the war in Iraq was all about oil. Or are you claiming that Obama screwed up the grand plan and didn't secure all the oil for the US?
 
Bacon runs my stomach. Not my truck. Big difference. Plus we can always farm here. We got plenty of space. Ever seen a map of the western US?

Ever seen a map of the world?
 
So Iraq was all about oil for China? Why would we do that?

We can't go steal another nations natural resources. We can, however, allow that nation to sell their resource on the global market. This increases supply thereby reducing demand. I wonder how much of that chinese money going to iraq used to go to iran. Hmm...
 
Back
Top Bottom