• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

'Ricin' sent to New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg

numerous posters have commented that your claim about loughner is nothing more than hysterical bald faced lies



back up your claim-you cannot


He was not a republican or a tea party member.

Jared Loughner, Suspect in Giffords Shooting, Was Registered as an Independent


Jared Lee Loughner a Registered Independent; Didn't Vote in 2010 - Political Hotsheet - CBS News


Jared Loughner Independent | Arizona Shooting | Media | Mediaite
NOw you have been educated yet again. Smart money suggests that you will continue to spew this silly lie however

Face it, you are completely dishonest on this issue

Well we have teabaggers in here who refused to vote for in 2012 because they felt neither candidate was worthy of their vote in support. We also have teabaggers who don't formally affiliate with the GOP because they feel the mainstream Republican't is a sellout to 'conservatism'. Not being registered in the GOP doesn't mean a person isn't a teabagger. It can even mean he is a very radical Teabagger who can't stand the mainstream GOP.
 
Well we have teabaggers in here who refused to vote for in 2012 because they felt neither candidate was worthy of their vote in support. We also have teabaggers who don't formally affiliate with the GOP because they feel the mainstream Republican't is a sellout to 'conservatism'. Not being registered in the GOP doesn't mean a person isn't a teabagger. It can even mean he is a very radical Teabagger who can't stand the mainstream GOP.

and that has absolutely no relevance to either the idiotic claim that loughner was a teabagger or my response
 
and that has absolutely no relevance to either the idiotic claim that loughner was a teabagger or my response

Oh it does, it is as idiotic to claim because someone is registered as Independent he can't be a Teabagger when many TPs here do just that.
 
Oh it does, it is as idiotic to claim because someone is registered as Independent he can't be a Teabagger when many TPs here do just that.

and you apparently miss the point that its idiotic to claim that someone is a teabagger when the only proof is that he "might be"

there is no other evidence
 
and you apparently miss the point that its idiotic to claim that someone is a teabagger when the only proof is that he "might be"

there is no other evidence

Oh I got that plus the idiotic claim that because a guy is registered as Independent that some how proves he isn't a TP... :peace
 
Oh I got that plus the idiotic claim that because a guy is registered as Independent that some how proves he isn't a TP... :peace

Insofar as his writings have been researched, he seems to have had vaguely leftist views.
 
I don't disagree with the bolded statement, but with the right it is at a higher frequency. I can give you tons of examples of conservative violence while you could probably only give a few with the left. There is a reason why conservatives are pro gun, pro death penalty and pro war. They seem to have a propensity for violence.

Go ahead and give it to us. I dare you.
 
No, Bloomberg is not a terrorist. You don't get to toss terms of that severity around with such casualty. That mentality lends credence to the very actions we're discussing.

Libbos do it all the time.
 
Oh I got that plus the idiotic claim that because a guy is registered as Independent that some how proves he isn't a TP... :peace

do you realize that is incredibly stupid?

Because Joe Smith claims to be a catholic that somehow proves he is not a mormon?

well maybe he is a mormon but his claim doesn't prove it

and claiming that Loughner is a Tea party member because

1) he is an independent

2) some people who claim to be independents might actually be tea party members

is a complete failure of logic and common sense
 
And you know this how? I do like vaguely as the keyword, it covers a lot of 'sin'...

he sure has better evidence than that then the clownish claim that a guy who killed a conservative judge and a moderately conservative (and at the time pro gun) Republican turned democrat was a "tea party member"
 
do you realize that is incredibly stupid?

Because Joe Smith claims to be a catholic that somehow proves he is not a mormon?

well maybe he is a mormon but his claim doesn't prove it

and claiming that Loughner is a Tea party member because

1) he is an independent

2) some people who claim to be independents might actually be tea party members

is a complete failure of logic and common sense

No it is incredibly stupid for you to claim he isn't a teabagger because he is an independent like so many of our teabaggers... repeating your nonsense doesn't make it true.
 
Had you bothered to read anything about the case you'd know it too.:cool:

having seen many of the blogs brought in here as fact i'd say it depends on where you read something how much truth there is behind it, but please lay some of it on us...
 
No it is incredibly stupid for you to claim he isn't a teabagger because he is an independent like so many of our teabaggers... repeating your nonsense doesn't make it true.


LOL, some guy makes a moronic claim that Loughner is a tea party member

no proof no nothing. I pointed out that the BEST ANYONE could come up with is that he was an independent meaning there is NO EVIDENCE that 99percenter's idiotic claim has any support

I say he was not a tea bagger because there is ZERO evidence he was

in your desire to try to contradict me you come up with equally stupid nonsense as the crappy assertion 99percenter spewed
 
having seen many of the blogs brought in here as fact i'd say it depends on where you read something how much truth there is behind it, but please lay some of it on us...

High school and college classmate described his views as "very liberal" and "radical.":cool:
 
Having read everything about the case, I know that you're wrong

Learn, then post

High school and college classmate Caitie Parker described his views as "left wing", "very liberal" and "radical.":cool:
 
Off topic.

giveadamn.gif
 
LOL, some guy makes a moronic claim that Loughner is a tea party member no proof no nothing. I pointed out that the BEST ANYONE could come up with is that he was an independent meaning there is NO EVIDENCE that 99percenter's idiotic claim has any support I say he was not a tea bagger because there is ZERO evidence he was in your desire to try to contradict me you come up with equally stupid nonsense as the crappy assertion 99percenter spewed

Actually you attempt to claim he isn't a Teabagger by showing him as an independent is equally stupid nonsense.
 
Actually you attempt to claim he isn't a Teabagger by showing him as an independent is equally stupid nonsense.

the duty is for the guy who made such an idiotic claim to prove it

your post is comical. you seem to think if the only evidence ANYONE can find is that Loughner was an independent -that someone means he is as likely to be a tea party member as not

again, in your haste to want to take issue with my obviously common sense point, you post silliness
 
Off topic.

Not off topic at all. One person's opinion on luoghner isn't very insightful and the fact that thousands of TeaBaggers call Romney, McCain, any Republican't they don't like a RINO just shows there is far more opinion than fact in your claims to what this guy was.
 
the duty is for the guy who made such an idiotic claim to prove it your post is comical. you seem to think if the only evidence ANYONE can find is that Loughner was an independent -that someone means he is as likely to be a tea party member as not again, in your haste to want to take issue with my obviously common sense point, you post silliness

Then you should have said that instead of the idiotic claim that as an Independent Loughner wasn't a TeaBagger. :roll:

Your attempt at using independent to not mean Teabagger is utter silliness.
 
Back
Top Bottom