your post is comical. you seem to think if the only evidence ANYONE can find is that Loughner was an independent -that someone means he is as likely to be a tea party member as not
again, in your haste to want to take issue with my obviously common sense point, you post silliness
or that Lanza, and the other recent mass murderers were more likely conservatives rather than democrats or liberals?
what we do know is that one side wants to disarm potential victims and that attitude is helpful for people like Lanza, Loughner and others. and that is your side
do you have any understanding about normal protocols concerning proof
lets claim that because Obama is the head of the Democratic Party that doesn't establish that he is NOT a tea party member