• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

man Michele Bachmann says she will not run for re-election in 2014

Deuce said:
Would you vote for Bachmann?
Click to expand...

Over Obama or Biden-for sure. you see my most important issue is judges and its the party leadership who picks the judges. We would get the same judges under a Bachmann presidency as we would under Romney, McCain Jeb Bush or Huntsman

for congress I don't know. I have voted for dems in more local elections-I voted for Strickland for Ohio Governor in 2010 and for Dem incumbent AG Cordray over the GOP whiner er winner Mike DeWHINE
 
Buck Ewer said:
If $istah $arah and Bat**** Bachmann were ever in the same room together the intellectual vacuum created would collapse the walls.
Translation: "When this **** hits the fan about how the money was spent, I won't be able to run for dog catcher and make a decent showing..."
Click to expand...

Michelle Bachmann and Sarah Palin are intellectual giants compared to Obama or Biden. In fact either of them are miles ahead of any leftist I've seen on these boards, if their juvenile comments are anything to go by.
 
TurtleDude said:
for congress I don't know. I have voted for dems in more local elections-I voted for Strickland for Ohio Governor in 2010 and for Dem incumbent AG Cordray over the GOP whiner er winner Mike DeWHINE
Click to expand...

I think I might've voted Graves over her. He doesn't seem to far out there economically for a Democrat from what I know of him, and not have Bachmann on a national stage can only be a plus for conservatives.
 
Top Cat said:
Rep. Michele Bachmann says she will not run for re-election in 2014 | Fox News


She goes on to say...



Let me translate: "I will be working from the studio in my house that Fox News will be building for me." Unless she and her husband are too busy praying away the gay.
Click to expand...

Fox News? Doubt it...

It seems like shes disgusted by politics in general...

Politics are a dirty game of trading votes like general managers in sports. "If you vote for X legislation I will vote for Y legislation.. Deal?"

That's why most politicians are lawyers - they lost their morals, ethics and standards long ago.
 
Dooble said:
Let me debug your translation: "There is no future option or opportunity, be it directly in the political arena or otherwise, that I won't be giving serious consideration if it can help save and protect our great nation."
Click to expand...

No doubt that's precisely what she wants her sheep to believe.
 
Mr.Nick said:
FIt seems like shes disgusted by politics in general....
Click to expand...

This is the very same woman who suggested there should be a congressional investigation to determine whether Obama is Anti American. And mind you, she is married to a man who takes money from others so that they can "pray away the gay"

She personifies disgusting.
 
TurtleDude said:
Over Obama or Biden-for sure. you see my most important issue is judges and its the party leadership who picks the judges. We would get the same judges under a Bachmann presidency as we would under Romney, McCain Jeb Bush or Huntsman

for congress I don't know. I have voted for dems in more local elections-I voted for Strickland for Ohio Governor in 2010 and for Dem incumbent AG Cordray over the GOP whiner er winner Mike DeWHINE
Click to expand...

On the other hand, think long-term. After one term of President Bachmann, how many decades would it be before the US elected a Republican again? :D We could end up with 8 liberals on the court that way.

(Scalia feeds off the life force of kittens and small children, he will never die)
 
Top Cat said:
This is the very same woman who suggested there should be a congressional investigation to determine whether Obama is Anti American. And mind you, she is married to a man who takes money from others so that they can "pray away the gay"

She personifies disgusting.
Click to expand...

What is wrong or illegal about that?

I'm pretty educated and I doubt that Obama is a legitimate US citizen.
 
TurtleDude said:
Over Obama or Biden-for sure. you see my most important issue is judges and its the party leadership who picks the judges. We would get the same judges under a Bachmann presidency as we would under Romney, McCain Jeb Bush or Huntsman

for congress I don't know. I have voted for dems in more local elections-I voted for Strickland for Ohio Governor in 2010 and for Dem incumbent AG Cordray over the GOP whiner er winner Mike DeWHINE
Click to expand...


Better yet, how would Obama NOT being president lawfully as far as precedent hold over to the globalists?

That is the precedent Obama is trying to break.

I think it is about that time that "conservative activists" have their own little OWS.

I'm not talking Glen Beck either - I'm talking Michael Savage and precedent(s).

At lest 90 members can vouch that I was born where my documents say and no family members will disagree and say I was born in Sicially because I'm Sicilian.
 
Mr.Nick said:
What is wrong or illegal about that?

I'm pretty educated and I doubt that Obama is a legitimate US citizen.
Click to expand...

The second part of your second sentence pretty much identifies the first part as being incorrect.
 
Mr.Nick said:
Better yet, how would Obama NOT being president lawfully as far as precedent hold over to the globalists?

That is the precedent Obama is trying to break.

I think it is about that time that "conservative activists" have their own little OWS.

I'm not talking Glen Beck either - I'm talking Michael Savage and precedent(s).

At lest 90 members can vouch that I was born where my documents say and no family members will disagree and say I was born in Sicially because I'm Sicilian.
Click to expand...

... can you clarify this post because I'm really confused as to what you're trying to say.
 
Does that explain their political success? How did we end up with these two yahoos in the WH when both these brilliant (and sexy) woman tried for the office?

Maybe you underestimte the opposition? Judging all society bt the few hyper-partisan lefties or righties on DP may not present an accurate picture.



Grant said:
Michelle Bachmann and Sarah Palin are intellectual giants compared to Obama or Biden. In fact either of them are miles ahead of any leftist I've seen on these boards, if their juvenile comments are anything to go by.
Click to expand...
 
Deuce said:
... can you clarify this post because I'm really confused as to what you're trying to say.
Click to expand...

Is Obama a hypocrite, liar or spokesman.
 
Mr.Nick said:
Is Obama a hypocrite, liar or spokesman.
Click to expand...

... and which part of the post that I quoted did you think conveyed this concept!?
 
Grant said:
Michelle Bachmann and Sarah Palin are intellectual giants compared to Obama or Biden. In fact either of them are miles ahead of any leftist I've seen on these boards, if their juvenile comments are anything to go by.
Click to expand...

2 elections later and Obama beat both of them. So much for intellectual giants.
 
Grant said:
Michelle Bachmann and Sarah Palin are intellectual giants compared to Obama or Biden. In fact either of them are miles ahead of any leftist I've seen on these boards, if their juvenile comments are anything to go by.
Click to expand...

I do not personally know either Biden or Bachmann and have never administerd an IQ test to either of them . Hence , I really don't know their intellectual ability.
I do know they both have this uncanny ability to appear butt ass stupid anytime they open their mouth.



Standing on a stage drinking a Big Gulp giving soundbites is not the first thing to come to my mind when describing intellectual giant.
 
Hatuey said:
2 elections later and Obama beat both of them. So much for intellectual giants.
Click to expand...

Obama didn't beat either of them,Bachmann never ran against Obama.....Palin wasn't the main person on the ballot in 2008,McCain was.
 
Top Cat said:
No doubt that's precisely what she wants her sheep to believe.
Click to expand...
Uh-huh. Notwithstanding what Barack Obama wants his lemmings to believe.
 
specklebang said:
Does that explain their political success? How did we end up with these two yahoos in the WH when both these brilliant (and sexy) woman tried for the office?
Click to expand...

It's my opinion that the majority of the electorate isn't very intelligent. Every politician, every dictator in fact, promises the same Hope and Change in a variety of ways but they elected this inexperienced guy with the belief that he was telling the truth. Then despite his failings, lies, and his questionable past, they did it again! How is that possible unless the electorate is uninformed and driven by party politics rather than reality?

Maybe you underestimte the opposition?
Click to expand...
The political opposition? No , i think they know how to manipulate their followers. The electorate? How is it possible to underestimate them? A generation of propaganda has done the trick it was intended to do.
Judging all society bt the few hyper-partisan lefties or righties on DP may not present an accurate picture.
Click to expand...

They're everywhere, and the last presidential election confirms that.
 
Crosscheck said:
I do know they both have this uncanny ability to appear butt ass stupid anytime they open their mouth.
Click to expand...

You know that, huh?

This is the intelligentsia of the left talking. The issues of the day are too difficult and foreign for them to discuss so they fall back on their clever repartee of "buck ass stupid" and discuss Big Gulps as though they were an important factor in the election. And it probably was to them.

Do you see my point now, Specklebang?
 
Grant said:
You know that, huh?

This is the intelligentsia of the left talking. The issues of the day are too difficult and foreign for them to discuss so they fall back on their clever repartee of "buck ass stupid" and discuss Big Gulps as though they were an important factor in the election. And it probably was to them.

Do you see my point now, Specklebang?
Click to expand...

If you want to throw an insult at me at least learn to read and write . The term was "Butt Ass Stupid" not "Buck Ass Stupid".

Get it right next time or ask your mom for help.
 
Crosscheck said:
If you want to throw an insult at me at least learn to read and write . The term was "Butt Ass Stupid" not "Buck Ass Stupid".

Get it right next time or ask your mom for help.
Click to expand...

I'm not insulting you personally, I'm using you as an example of a typical democrat and the way they present their political arguments.

Although you're more familiar with the term "Butt Ass Stupid" than I am, the word Butt makes Ass redundant, doesn't it? The next time you hear it you might want to mention this.
 
I've often heard what idiots the electorate are. In fact, I always hear that ater one side or another has promised their way into victory.

So, apparently just me and maybe a few hundred others are geniuses and everybody else is stupid. In which case, no matter who wins, we lose but we don't deserve better.

To say you manipulate your followers is kind of redundant. I man, they're your followers, so you don't have to manipulate them. Now, why people choose to be followers, I don't know. I'm not a party follower. I see they are polar opposites and usually both wrong.

I had many reasons to disapprove of both candidates. I found some moderation in the 3rd parties but I am well aware that pople can only see party D and party R. Too bad, we'll always be unhappy this way.


Grant said:
It's my opinion that the majority of the electorate isn't very intelligent. Every politician, every dictator in fact, promises the same Hope and Change in a variety of ways but they elected this inexperienced guy with the belief that he was telling the truth. Then despite his failings, lies, and his questionable past, they did it again! How is that possible unless the electorate is uninformed and driven by party politics rather than reality?

The political opposition? No , i think they know how to manipulate their followers. The electorate? How is it possible to underestimate them? A generation of propaganda has done the trick it was intended to do.


They're everywhere, and the last presidential election confirms that.
Click to expand...
 
I think he was referring to Palin and Bachman. He could have tossed in Pelosi and Boxer to find balance.

So, that doesn't make him wrong, it just makes him selective. I'm not sure how The Big Gulp Menace got in here (I confess I only read the last 2 pages). But if you're looking for anti-anti big gulp support, I'm in.




Grant said:
You know that, huh?

This is the intelligentsia of the left talking. The issues of the day are too difficult and foreign for them to discuss so they fall back on their clever repartee of "buck ass stupid" and discuss Big Gulps as though they were an important factor in the election. And it probably was to them.

Do you see my point now, Specklebang?
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom