Liberals - Punish the Successful, Reward the Unsuccessful
Liberals - Tax, Borrow, Spend, and Give Free Stuff
Obama's legacy - National Debt / Credit Downgrade / Obamacare Failure / Economic Failure / Foreign Policy Failure / Liar of the Year Award / The Rise of ISIS
"I am appalled that somebody who is the nominee...would take that kind of position"
"A court took away a presidency"
"...the brother of a man running for president was the governor of the state..."
It's horrifying because Trump is blunt instead of making overt implications.
If you look at the organizations that were approved, Conservative groups outnumbered Liberal groups by about 4:1. Furthermore, if all you do is examine word frequency and profile based on words which occur in at least 5 political groups at a rate 5 times greater than appear in groups applying at large you get these keywords.
Tea: 22 Times more likely
Patriots: 13 Times more likely
Party: 12 Times more likely
Ohio: 6 Times more likely
Coalition: 6 Times more likely
Fund: 5 Times more likely
Action: 5 Times more likely.
http://www.debatepolitics.com/breaki...post1061842597 (IRS officials in Washington were involved in targeting of conservative groups)
Because conservative groups were disproportional represented, there's a very high bar needed to prove that conservatives were disproportionately targeted. Even if the evidence indicates that conservatives were in fact subject to more scrutiny, you'll have an even tougher time showing that conservatives were targeted due to political bias rather than because they were the principle violators.
AND... even if you could prove all of that, the law still states that a 501(c)(4) group must be engaged EXCLUSIVELY in social welfare. The IRS changed this to primarily in the 1950s to allow other incidental actions that are not part of the primary mission (ie having a Christmas party). But in any case none of these groups, liberal or conservative, have any justification to exist. They are all 527's and should file as 527s.