But guess what? We don't begin to "pay much more" until people reach retirement age (when health care shifts from an employer-based model to a government-based model). By the time people reach 70, we're paying 3 times more. By the time people reach 80, we're paying 6-7 times more. When you look at the data, we're spending much more money for slightly better outcomes after age 65, but not enough to justify the cost.
If you think we should be spending less on health care, Medicare is without question the best place to start.
Last edited by Taylor; 05-20-13 at 11:47 AM.
Obamacare has absolutely nothing to do with giving adequate healthcare and everything to do with dictating outcomes both socially and economically.
If the government can control your healthcare then they can control you, businesses and just about every facade of our nation.
This is nothing more than a back door to control people and businesses.
For example - they well tell you that you are overweight then attack businesses (all businesses that contribute down the line of production) as a contributor to collective obesity. Of course they (or progressive government) will attempt to sell our FORMAL INDIVIDUAL PROBLEM as a "collective problem" to the people, in which the sheeple will say "shut down McDonalds and kill those jobs because I'm not paying for fat people to get fatter." So of course the government will push bans and regulations (which in turn will dictate economic outcomes) and the people who support that loony bull**** will be the victims of their attempt to dictate social outcomes.
This has nothing to do with healthcare and everything to do with dictating outcomes both socially and economically.
secondly, we treat everyone, but those without insurance have an access point at the absolute most expensive end of the spectrum. then the rest of us pay for that care.
finally, care is so expensive that most people avoid seeking treatment until the condition has reached a level of severity that it ends up being even more expensive to treat. imagine if everybody went to the doctor for a physical and bloodwork twice a year. our costs would probably plummet, because we'd catch expensive diseases when they are easier to treat. it's simply good policy to make sure everyone has access to routine medical procedures without fear of bankruptcy.
honestly, i'd prefer medicare to be the single payer for basic care for everyone to the system we have now.
Obamacare supporter shocked that employers moving to bare bones coverage « Hot Air
Over at National Review, Veronique de Rugy highlights a recent Wall Street Journal article which brings home yet again the law of unintended consequences. (Assuming that the consequences of Obamacare are “unintended” based on the Pelosi theory of needing to pass the bill to find out what’s in it.) The short version of the analysis – and I know this will come as a massive shock to many of you – shows that employers will flock to lower cost, bare bones medical plans to avoid the increased costs and mandates of Obamacare, turning implementation into even more of “a train wreck”. Yes… yes… I know. Who could possibly have seen this coming?
Zionism is the National Liberation Movement of the Jewish People.
Turn insurance back into actual insurance and not only will it be less expensive, but the things that no insurance policy would cover can now be governed by the free market(i.e. bring in one child for a wellness visit, the second one is half off! )