Page 4 of 21 FirstFirst ... 2345614 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 201

Thread: Issa's Benghazi narrative falling apart

  1. #31
    Sage

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Last Seen
    05-16-15 @ 02:32 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    12,537

    Re: Issa's Benghazi narrative falling apart

    at the time she said it, it was the best assessment of the CIA
    then why was no mention made of it until saturday afternoon, some 94 pages in?

    that, by the way, would be ben rhodes (whom you don't know who he is)

    you don't know what you're talking about but it never stopped you before

    shut up and read

  2. #32
    Sage
    mak2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Indiana
    Last Seen
    07-08-16 @ 01:58 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    12,050

    Re: Issa's Benghazi narrative falling apart

    From what I have read I believed right at first the administration might have thought it was a reaction to that video. But they quickly knew there was a more organized attack. I believe AQ might have planned it that way. I also belive the presence of the CIA might be having the most influence on what was released and why the FBI did not get there for weeks. We wont know exactly what happened until someone leads the classified materials.
    Quote Originally Posted by The Prof View Post
    then why was no mention made of it until saturday afternoon, some 94 pages in?

    that, by the way, would be ben rhodes (whom you don't know who he is)

    you don't know what you're talking about but it never stopped you before

    shut up and read
    God Bless the Marine Corps.

  3. #33
    Sage
    pbrauer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Oregon
    Last Seen
    11-27-15 @ 03:31 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    25,394

    Re: Issa's Benghazi narrative falling apart

    Quote Originally Posted by MMC View Post
    Try again.....she was incorrect Yeah, she was incorrect. But No, She lied. As there was nothing Spontaneous. Nothing! Plus now it is known that 2 hrs into the attack by the CIA themselves it was planned. Moreover you cant get round the fact the Libyan President even released on TV that it was a Planned attack.

    Nice try tho!
    Yes, the CIA did know it was planned, but the talking points were signed by the CIA. I learned today there is an FBI policy not to blame any group because it may endanger plants. Susan Rice didn't lie and this controversy is falling apart. Good night.

  4. #34
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    Re: Issa's Benghazi narrative falling apart

    Quote Originally Posted by pbrauer View Post
    Yes, the CIA did know it was planned, but the talking points were signed by the CIA. I learned today there is an FBI policy not to blame any group because it may endanger plants. Susan Rice didn't lie and this controversy is falling apart. Good night.
    You can deny the facts all you want. To bad the MSMedia is Team Obama's Enemy this time. Remember the word that does her in. "Spontaneous". Goodnight.
    Last edited by MMC; 05-17-13 at 02:18 AM.

  5. #35
    Sage

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Last Seen
    05-16-15 @ 02:32 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    12,537

    Re: Issa's Benghazi narrative falling apart

    I believed right at first... I believe... I also belive (sic)...
    but you're an idiot, why do you think anyone other than your mother would be in the slightest interested in your half formed, unsubstantiated opinion

    shut up and link

    The Benghazi Emails: Talking Points Changed at State Dept.'s Request - ABC News

    White House releases Benghazi emails - The Hill - covering Congress, Politics, Political Campaigns and Capitol Hill | TheHill.com

    Benghazi Emails Directly Contradict White House Claims | The Weekly Standard

    Benghazi emails show State Department had heavy hand in watering down account of attack | Fox News

    the white house released 100 pages of select emails that, far from absolving foggy bottom as intended, only served to underscore state's paranoia, almost, about the disconcerting contents of those troublesome talking points

    petraeus: "frankly i'd just as soon not use them"

    cia: "the state dept had major reservations with much or most of the document"

    cia: "the white house cleared quickly but state has major concerns"

    nuland (you don't know who she is, she's hillary's spokesperson): "serious concerns about arming members of congress"

    nuland: "why do we want hill [congress] targeting ansar al sharia"

    "and the penultimate [second from last] point could be abused by members to beat the state dept for not paying attention to agency warnings, so why do we want to feed either"

    these references to terror, these catalogs of warnings, she worries, "will come back to us at podium"

    nuland: "after conversation with [name redacted] serious concerns"

    nuland: changes which left intact references to "islamic extremists with ties to al qaeda" ms nuland finds, “didn’t resolve all my issues or those of my building leadership”

    asst secty adams: "they will read to members like we had been repeatedly warned"

    "john brennan [obama's nsa at the time] will have edits"

    "talked to tommy [vietor], we can make edits"

    ms nuland openly refers to "offline conversations"

    cia: “the state department had major reservations with much or most of the document, we revised the document with their concerns in mind”

    if these rocking revelations are contained in the 100 pages this woebegone white house can make public, what must hide in the 2500 pages held back?
    Last edited by The Prof; 05-17-13 at 02:29 AM.

  6. #36
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Chicago Illinois
    Last Seen
    10-14-15 @ 09:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    56,981

    Re: Issa's Benghazi narrative falling apart

    Quote Originally Posted by pbrauer View Post
    Yes, the CIA did know it was planned, but the talking points were signed by the CIA. I learned today there is an FBI policy not to blame any group because it may endanger plants. Susan Rice didn't lie and this controversy is falling apart. Good night.
    "Oh".....and one other thing. The FBI wasn't investigating anything in Libya before we were attacked. I forgot to remind you of that fact.

  7. #37
    Sage

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Last Seen
    05-16-15 @ 02:32 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    12,537

    Re: Issa's Benghazi narrative falling apart

    Susan Rice didn't lie
    sunday, the 5th:

    “Well, it was scrubbed,” Massachusetts Democratic Rep. Steve Lynch told “Fox News Sunday.” “It was totally inaccurate. There's no excuse for that. It was false information. And what they try to do is harmonize what happened in Benghazi with what happened everywhere else across the Middle East.”

    Lynch also acknowledged the talking points were likely revised to reflect President Obama’s decry – with his re-election bid in the balance -- that “Al Qaeda is on the run.”

    Maryland Democratic Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, also acknowledged Sunday the facts as told by Rice were wrong.

    “At the time, as it turns out” the information was incorrect, he said on CBS’ “Face the Nation”
    Democrats now critical of Rice's Benghazi explanation, amid more damaging evidence | Fox News

    ruppersberger from dark blue maryland is ranking member (top democrat) in the republican controlled house intel committee, as such ruppersberger is the pelosi caucus' lead voice on all matters intel

    ruppersberger is the person who contacted cia to ask, what do i tell my constituents, which query got the entire tortuous talking points tergiversation started

    lynch is south boston, blue collar, he lost to markey in the primary two weeks ago

    lynch's folks, therefore, are those who lived thru the marathon bombing by the brothers tsarnaev, fyi

    i could find you a dozen conclusions from msm's identical to his and rup's if you want

    Brokaw: ‘You Cannot Explain Away Susan Rice’s Performance on Those Sunday Talk Shows’ | Washington Free Beacon

    many are posted above

  8. #38
    Sage

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Last Seen
    05-16-15 @ 02:32 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    12,537

    Re: Issa's Benghazi narrative falling apart

    Former Ambassador Thomas Pickering, co-chair of the Benghazi Accountability Review Board, on Sunday defended the investigation into the Benghazi attacks, saying the board did not formally question former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton or other high ranking officials because it didn't believe it was necessary.

    We briefed them them on the report, we told them where we were,” Pickering said on CBS'S "Face the Nation." “We had plenty of opportunity had we felt it was necessary to ask them questions. We didn’t believe that was necessary, and I don’t see any reason to do so now.”

    Pressed further by host Bob Schieffer, Pickering said they did not question Clinton because they knew where the "responsibility rested" and that she had already accepted full responsibility as part her job.

    Pickering also defended not questioning Clinton because the board interviewed people who attended meetings with her.


    Pickering said the board's interviews were not recorded because “we didn’t feel that it was necessary for us to get essential elements of information down" through recordings, and that notes of essential points were taken instead.

    Pickering said he was not invited to last week's House committee hearing on the Sept. 11 attacks on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, though he's "fully prepared" to come at any time to discuss the accountability board's investigation.
    Pickering defends not questioning Clinton - POLITICO.com

    the ambassador was indeed invited, he's lying

    http://abcnews.go.com/images/Politic...azi%203-14.pdf

  9. #39
    Tavern Bartender
    Constitutionalist
    American's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 12:03 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    76,301

    Re: Issa's Benghazi narrative falling apart

    Quote Originally Posted by poweRob View Post
    If any of you mother****ers don't start giving me some props for my ingenious new phrase. I had better see an LOL and soon or I'm going to be very, VERY dissappointed in this forum. It's just embarrassing to have to actually fish for compliments at this level.
    Sorry, I didn't get it at first.
    "He who does not think himself worth saving from poverty and ignorance by his own efforts, will hardly be thought worth the efforts of anybody else." -- Frederick Douglass, Self-Made Men (1872)
    "Fly-over" country voted, and The Donald is now POTUS.

  10. #40
    Tavern Bartender
    Constitutionalist
    American's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 12:03 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    76,301

    Re: Issa's Benghazi narrative falling apart

    Quote Originally Posted by pbrauer View Post
    Yes, the CIA did know it was planned, but the talking points were signed by the CIA. I learned today there is an FBI policy not to blame any group because it may endanger plants. Susan Rice didn't lie and this controversy is falling apart. Good night.
    So the CIA signed the talking points? They work for Obama, so there's no excuse. They all work for Obama, except Congress. So signing points, which they were told to revise, means nothing.
    "He who does not think himself worth saving from poverty and ignorance by his own efforts, will hardly be thought worth the efforts of anybody else." -- Frederick Douglass, Self-Made Men (1872)
    "Fly-over" country voted, and The Donald is now POTUS.

Page 4 of 21 FirstFirst ... 2345614 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •