Never mind the fact that it meets every states statute of first degree murder...
Against will? well maybe ****ing has consequences? if an individual isn't responsible enough to care for a child than they're not responsible enough to screw....And I am sorry to have to explain to you that when a person is occupying and modifying your body against your will, you have the right to use force in self-defense.
It shows how stupid they are by having unprotected sex.... "who cares we can always have an abortion" what about STD's? oh yeah no one has any of those in the moment..
What will it take for you "pro-choicers" to realize a fetus or baby is an individual and NOT a body part?Funny you pro-lifers keep bringing up slavery when you're the ones trying to demand involuntary servitude from women. And what is with this festering plague of pro-life "Libertarians"? You'll argue all goddamned day against liberal "human rights" on the basis that you can't have any right to any good or service if it would require another person to be forced to provide it to you-- and then you say that women should be forced to gestate children because of their innate "right to life". Or do Libertarian theories about personal rights simply not apply to women?
So woman have to birth babies while the stronger men have to physically build a nation...
I got news for you - babies don't fall from the sky - humans have to reproduce - however our reproductive process shouldn't involve murdering offspring out of convenience. We frack to procreate - we just have big enough brains to turn fracking int a fun adventure.
You don't know what I adhere to.That's really rich coming from a Libertarian. Isn't your argument that all human rights extend from property rights and the principle of self-ownership?