- Joined
- Jul 1, 2011
- Messages
- 67,218
- Reaction score
- 28,530
- Location
- Lower Hudson Valley, NY
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Independent
The taking of a human life is not murder?
So this Fla guy should walk then, correct?
No and no.
The taking of a human life is not murder?
So this Fla guy should walk then, correct?
No and no.
Then why is he being charged with first degree murder when he didn't kill anyone?
Traditionally, the taking of a human life is referred to as murder.
Meh. I do not oppose infanticide laws that apply to fetuses as long as they are not designated as murder. Assaulting a pregnant woman such that she loses her baby is clearly a greater offense than assaulting a man or a non-pregnant woman, especially when the assault was for the deliberate purpose of inducing a miscarriage. Murder? Not hardly, but still greater than aggravated assault.
And I am sorry to have to explain to you that when a person is occupying and modifying your body against your will, you have the right to use force in self-defense.
Funny you pro-lifers keep bringing up slavery when you're the ones trying to demand involuntary servitude from women. And what is with this festering plague of pro-life "Libertarians"? You'll argue all goddamned day against liberal "human rights" on the basis that you can't have any right to any good or service if it would require another person to be forced to provide it to you-- and then you say that women should be forced to gestate children because of their innate "right to life". Or do Libertarian theories about personal rights simply not apply to women?
That's really rich coming from a Libertarian. Isn't your argument that all human rights extend from property rights and the principle of self-ownership?
Because the UVVA specifies that people who attack a mother and cause a fetus to die should be charged with murder.
You say he attacked the mother? Please provide a link.
You say he attacked the mother? Please provide a link.
Wrong. Abortion is about rights, and is not murder
I enjoy watching the right try to claim the high moral ground by posting lies.
Really?
If it's not about morals than why is society organized with legitimate laws such as murder and not in the grasp of anarchy?
You're wrong...
Asked an answered
So woman have to birth babies while the stronger men have to physically build a nation...
Yes really
Because we have a constitution
The abortion banners would like to forget about the constitution
What is t he difference between offing a "fetus" or an old clown with dementia?
When people get old they turn into big babies.
What?
Where is abortion in the Bill of Rights or beyond???
Not to mention isn't "life and liberty" language used in the Fourteenth Amendment?
Would you go ahead now and save us time by just ****ing admitting that your "pro-life" stance is based on your misogynist belief that women should stay pregnant and in the kitchen? Because you just revealed that it was.
Now I'm a "misogynist" because I view murder as murder?
I like your attempt to change the subject tho.... I don't eat them apples tho.
The constitution only protects the lives of persons. The unborn are not persons
Apples are a symbol of knowledge, specifically knowing the difference between right and wrong
One has been born and the other has not
Now I'm a "misogynist" because I view murder as murder?
So woman have to birth babies while the stronger men have to physically build a nation...
Would you go ahead now and save us time by just ****ing admitting that your "pro-life" stance is based on your misogynist belief that women should stay pregnant and in the kitchen? Because you just revealed that it was.
You're a misogynist because you believe women should be forced to birth babies while men do all the "real" work.
What is t he difference between offing a "fetus" or an old clown with dementia?
When SOME people get old they turn into big babies.