Page 13 of 28 FirstFirst ... 3111213141523 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 130 of 273

Thread: Mcclatchy: amabasador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security

  1. #121
    Sage
    apdst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bagdad, La.
    Last Seen
    Today @ 09:57 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    76,356

    Re: Mcclatchy: amabasador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security

    Quote Originally Posted by Grant View Post
    And the Secretary of Stare was only a former first lady, with no accomplishments apart from that.

    The question then must be, why are these people holding public office? What sort of nitwits vote for them?
    The Libbos have recieved their instructions from Chris Matthews to go full tilt with the incompetence defense.
    Quote Originally Posted by Top Cat View Post
    At least Bill saved his transgressions for grown women. Not suggesting what he did was OK. But he didn't chase 14 year olds.

  2. #122
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Canada, Costa Rica
    Last Seen
    05-16-16 @ 09:45 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    31,645

    Re: Mcclatchy: amabasador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security

    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    The Libbos have recieved their instructions from Chris Matthews to go full tilt with the incompetence defense.
    First they blamed George Bush for four years and now they finally and openly admit to their own incompetence, though we knew that all along.

    Is there any way this guy can last to the end of his term?

  3. #123
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Last Seen
    10-20-13 @ 04:50 AM
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    3,195

    Re: Mcclatchy: amabasador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security

    Quote Originally Posted by pbrauer View Post
    LMMFAO The Commander-in-Chief is NOT a battle field commander, he's a civilian who knows little about warfare. I sure don't know about low information people.
    Only the President (Commander in Chief) has cross-border authority

  4. #124
    Sage
    pbrauer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Oregon
    Last Seen
    11-27-15 @ 03:31 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    25,394

    Re: Mcclatchy: amabasador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security

    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    great job promoting Obama's uselessness as a CIC. You confirm that he's the chump in charge...LOL!!!

    He's surrounded by hundred years of military experience. You would think he would have the intelligence to pick up that damn phone.
    Quote Originally Posted by Grant View Post
    And the Secretary of Stare was only a former first lady, with no accomplishments apart from that.

    The question then must be, why are these people holding public office? What sort of nitwits vote for them?
    11 p.m. (5 p.m. ET): Just ahead of the weekly meeting with Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Chairman of Joint Chiefs Martin Dempsey, White House National Security Advisor Tom Donilon tells President Obama of the attack and the fire at the main villa. The president and those officials discuss possible responses to the situation. link

  5. #125
    Sage


    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    IL
    Last Seen
    Today @ 10:32 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    36,767

    Re: Mcclatchy: amabasador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security

    Is a Libbo like a ditto-head?
    Matthews is a chameleon.
    Clinton was elected how many times to the Senate?
    Repubs have hated Hillary since she adopted the Heritage Health Plan.
    We already have anti-Hillary ads.
    Even Americans aren't that stupid?

  6. #126
    Sage

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Last Seen
    05-16-15 @ 02:32 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    12,537

    Re: Mcclatchy: amabasador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security

    the admin's newest defense: we're the idiots

    "We're portrayed by Republicans as either being lying or idiots," said one Obama administration official who was part of the Benghazi response. "It's actually closer to us being idiots."
    Officials on Benghazi: "We made mistakes, but without malice" - CBS News

    the white house which released a select 100 pages of email chain to absolve hillary's state dept...

    the white house which next sent jake tapper a single email from ben rhodes which was sposed to make issa look like an nbc producer editing a trayvon martin phone call...

    only to see both rather pathetic efforts blow up in their faces (links above)...

    now the admin has hustled out a team of "officials who were in key positions on september 11" who, speaking on "condition of anonymity so that they could be more frank in their assessments," have put forward this very reassuring explanation for all the confusion about the talking points and the requests for security ignored and the failure to send help that nite and...

    it's all attributable to "incompetence..."

    "rather than malice or coverup"

    well, thank goodness for that

    it was such a long time ago, however, what difference does it really make

    The [newest] list of mea culpas by Obama administration officials involved in the Benghazi response and aftermath include: standing down the counterterrorism Foreign Emergency Support Team, failing to convene the Counterterrorism Security Group, failing to release the disputed Benghazi "talking points" when Congress asked for them, and using the word "spontaneous" while avoiding the word "terrorism."
    fest, the foreign emergency support team:

    The Foreign Emergency Support Team known as FEST is described as "the US Government's only interagency, on-call, short-notice team poised to respond to terrorist incidents worldwide."

    Yet deployment of the counterterrorism experts on the FEST was ruled out from the start. That decision became a source of great internal dissent and the cause of puzzlement to some outsiders.

    Thursday, an administration official who was part of the Benghazi response told CBS News: "I wish we'd sent it."

    The official said Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's deputy, Patrick Kennedy, quickly dispensed with the idea.

    However, the FEST's own mission statement describes a seasoned team of counterterrorism professionals who can respond "quickly and effectively to terrorist attacks... providing the fastest assistance possible" including "hostage negotiating expertise" and "time-sensitive information and intelligence."

    In fact, FEST leader Mark Thompson says Benghazi was precisely the sort of crisis to which his team is trained to respond.

    While it was the State Department that's said to have taken FEST off the table, the team is directed by the White House National Security Council.

    As soon as word of the Benghazi attack reached Washington, FEST members "instinctively started packing," said an official involved in the response. "They were told they were not deploying by Patrick Kennedy's front office... In hindsight... I probably would've pushed the button."

    Said one source, "I don't see a downside to sending FEST... if for no other reason than so no one could ask why we didn't."
    throwing patrick kennedy under the bus is barreling down hard on hrc herself

    the csg, counterterrorism security group, which was never convened:

    Under presidential directive, an interagency task force called the Counterterrorism Security Group (CSG) is to be convened when emergency terrorist events are suspected. According to a public military document, it's part of a plan to "synchronize the efforts of all the government agencies that have a role to play in the Global War on Terrorism." But on Sept. 11, 2012, the Obama administration did not convene this body of terrorism expert advisers.

    Last October, National Security Council (NSC) SpokesmanTommy Vietor told CBS News that the CSG wasn't needed because consultations were quickly underway at the highest levels. "From the moment [President Obama] was briefed on the Benghazi attack, the response effort was handled by the most senior national security officials in government.

    However, absent the CSG's collective advice, there's evidence that some high-level decision makers were unaware of all available resources. In October, on a phone call that included then-Deputy National Security Adviser Denis McDonough (now White House Chief of Staff), Vietor initially told CBS News: "I don't know what [FEST] is... it sounds antiquated."
    in-extremis force in croatia (on 9-11):

    In an unfortunate turn of events, on Sept. 11, a special U.S. military force based in Europe, designed specifically for quick reaction to unforeseen emergencies, was off on a training mission in Croatia. By the time the so-called Commander's In-extremis Force was diverted to an airfield at Sigonella, Italy, an hour's flight from Benghazi, the attacks were over.

    "They didn't get there in time to have an impact, which is unfortunate," said a Defense Department source who was involved in the Benghazi response.

    Another administration source says, with the benefit of hindsight, everyone wishes US Africa Command (AFRICOM), the combatant command responsible for Libya on Sept. 11, had its own In-extremis Force.
    the dream team:

    A former Obama administration official says they were so confident in, and pleased with, the team of experts they pulled together to brief Congress on Benghazi, they were nicknamed the "Dream Team." The "Dream Team" consisted of: Maj. Gen. Darryl Roberson, Vice Director of Operations, Joint Staff; Matt Olson, Director of the National Counterterrorism Center; Andy McCabe, Assistant Director of Counterterrorism for the FBI; and Linda Weissgold from CIA.

    But some Obama administration sources now concede that, outside the "Dream Team," their post-attack communications and spin were riddled with missteps. Yet they insist that was the result of incompetence or confusion, and that no conspiracy was in play.
    the talking points:

    "We thought, 'why are you guys throwing us under the bus?' ...They [CIA] made it seem like the State Department was given a warning they ignored.

    As the various agencies worked to edit and approve the talking points on Sept. 14, Mr. Obama's Deputy National Security Advisor Ben Rhodes emailed that there would be a Deputies meeting the next morning to work out the issues. "That's polite code for let's not debate this on e-mail for 18 hours," said one official involved. (Ben Rhodes is the brother of CBS News President David Rhodes.)

    Even today, nobody will say on the record, or even off the record to CBS News, who was at the Deputies meeting on the morning of Sept. 15, where the talking points were drastically pared down for Rice's use. The approved version called the attacks "demonstrations" that "evolved" after being "spontaneously inspired" by protest at the U.S. Embassy in Cairo. All mentions of terrorism, al Qaeda and previous warnings given by the CIA had been excised.

    The Obama administration has resisted Congress' demands to turn over FBI transcripts of the survivor interviews.
    the turning point:

    On Sept. 20, a team of Obama administration officials with fresh information agreed to brief the House and Senate in closed sessions. There, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper revealed that Benghazi "had all the earmarks of a premeditated attack."

    From the view of one Obama administration official who was present, "Something just snapped. [Senators] started yelling and screaming 'Why did Susan [Rice] lie?'"

    "It was a turning point," said the Obama administration official. "It was just a stark shift from Sunday with no groundwork laid. [Senators] just snapped... Susan was done."
    shoulda relesed the emails:

    In an effort to sort out who-knew-what-when, Congress asked for the talking point drafts and e-mails last November, but the Obama administration withheld them on grounds of national security and the idea that they're deliberative materials not subject to public release. Congress continued to press and Republican senators even held up administration nominations. Finally, the administration allowed limited reviews of some of the materials but did not let members of Congress, or their staff, take documents from the room or make copies.

    An Obama administration source familiar with the process now says the talking points should have been handed over much sooner. "We should have released them six months ago," said the source, adding that the various federal agencies had agreed to do so but the White House counsel's office was against it.
    none dare call it terror, the 60 minutes interview, september 23, which david rhodes sat on for 2 months:

    KROFT: Mr. President, this morning you went out of your way to avoid the use of the word "terrorism" in connection with the Libya attack.

    OBAMA: Right.

    KROFT: Do you believe that this was a terrorist attack?

    OBAMA: Well, it's too early to know exactly how this came about, what group was involved, but obviously it was an attack on Americans.

    Several Obama administration officials said not using the word "terrorism" early on was not part of a conspiracy, but an "abundance of caution."
    the perfect portrait of stupidity AND coverup

    limpwrist lindsey graham: "incompetence and malice are not mutually exclusive"

    chafing jason chaffetz: "if not for congress, they would still lead us to believe it was a video gone awry"

    cuz if you're willing to concede like a clarion that you're a klutz...

    what could you possibly be protecting?

    no wonder ms attkisson's days with tiffany are numbered
    Last edited by The Prof; 05-18-13 at 10:48 PM.

  7. #127
    Sage
    apdst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bagdad, La.
    Last Seen
    Today @ 09:57 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    76,356

    Re: Mcclatchy: amabasador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security

    Quote Originally Posted by pbrauer View Post
    11 p.m. (5 p.m. ET): Just ahead of the weekly meeting with Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Chairman of Joint Chiefs Martin Dempsey, White House National Security Advisor Tom Donilon tells President Obama of the attack and the fire at the main villa. The president and those officials discuss possible responses to the situation. link
    So what is it? Is Obama totally incompetant, or totally indecisive?
    Quote Originally Posted by Top Cat View Post
    At least Bill saved his transgressions for grown women. Not suggesting what he did was OK. But he didn't chase 14 year olds.

  8. #128
    Sage

    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Last Seen
    05-16-15 @ 02:32 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    12,537

    Re: Mcclatchy: amabasador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security

    Is Obama totally incompetent, or totally indecisive?
    according to the white house, he's totally incompetent

    leadership sent out what appears to be quite a few admin insiders in the last several days to whisper as much to ms attkisson---off the record "so they could be more frank in their assessments"

    see cbs link above

  9. #129
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Canada, Costa Rica
    Last Seen
    05-16-16 @ 09:45 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    31,645

    Re: Mcclatchy: amabasador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security

    Quote Originally Posted by pbrauer View Post
    11 p.m. (5 p.m. ET): Just ahead of the weekly meeting with Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Chairman of Joint Chiefs Martin Dempsey, White House National Security Advisor Tom Donilon tells President Obama of the attack and the fire at the main villa. The president and those officials discuss possible responses to the situation. link
    It didn't mention that one of the options. the one he finally went with, was packing his bags and heading for a Vegas.

  10. #130
    Sage
    pbrauer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Oregon
    Last Seen
    11-27-15 @ 03:31 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    25,394

    Re: Mcclatchy: amabasador Stevens twice said no to military offers of more security

    Quote Originally Posted by The Prof View Post
    according to the white house, he's totally incompetent

    leadership sent out what appears to be quite a few admin insiders in the last several days to whisper as much to ms attkisson---off the record "so they could be more frank in their assessments"

    see cbs link above
    Hey romney was on Leno last night

Page 13 of 28 FirstFirst ... 3111213141523 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •