I tell you what, I promise not to let my age and wisdom evicerate your points due to your youth and inexperience.
Now, the question is not how COULD they decimate state coffers, but how DID they, ESPECIALLY since allowing it to happen was voluntary?
Explain...
Good afternoon, ocean515. :2wave:
LOL! And it has to be recurrent training, given some of the public's "attention span of a gnat." :rofl:
That's right, and I think it's significant that in multiple news reports, assessments have used the word "chilling." Because that's exactly what this is--chilling. Asking what books folks are reading? Wanting printouts of Facebook posts?
No. No, no, no. The IRS wants YOU
The fixation on Limbaugh is pathetic. Really, it is. Why the obsession?
OK, cite us evidence (i. e. actual numbers from state budget offices) of this decimating in the large space below and then I can explain it to you (once I get the citations). . .
For your convenience, I have provide the standard right wing source below--I'm sure he has the citations :2rofll:
Conservatives need more help citing information to back up their claims, so when you provide their official source, it helps them.
Conservatives need more help citing information to back up their claims, so when you provide their official source, it helps them.
Conservatives need more help citing information to back up their claims, so when you provide their official source, it helps them.
Obviously the directive to stymie and investigate conservative 501(c)(4)'s and (c)(3)'s comes from the very top. Where has the term Tea Party terrorists come from? DHS, IRS, the Press, or the White House? Why have conservative groups come under attack, yet Progressive Leftist groups be allowed to violate the tenets of the rules set by the 501's. This fish stinks from the head.
IRS Rejected Group on Behalf of Planned ParenthoodThe IRS scandal of targeting tea party or conservative organizations grew deeper Wednesday with the revelation that the agency denied tax-exempt status to a pro-life organization because of its hypothetical opposition of Planned Parenthood. The Thomas Moore Society, a public interest law firm announced that one of their clients was told that their approval as a non-profit was conditioned on a commitment not to protest outside Planned Parenthood abortion clinics.
IRS Rejected Group on Behalf of Planned Parenthood.
~~~~~~~~~~~
I still claim that this fish is rotting and stinks from the head. Just how many conservative groups have been harassed and bullied by low level IRS agents directed from the top and I mean Obama appointees like Tim Geithner.
Conservatives need more help citing information to back up their claims, so when you provide their official source, it helps them.
Comic Sans overload... Arial or Helvetica is better for reading.
Conservative groups are not under attack. As far as I know, those with overtly political names were given extra scrutiny when applying for tax exemptions.
No group should, but since they do, the rules should be applied equally across the political board.Why should a pro-life movement group get a tax exemption?
And then, poof, they're gone...
Because a pro-abortion one does?
:shock:
Really? You really want to do this?
Ok.
California pension liabilities may swell to $328.6 bln -report | Reuters
Bankrupt California city to resume paying pension fund, but not bondholders | Reuters
California cities looking for economic recovery
Despite signs of economic recovery, many parts of the nation's most populous state are feeling a hangover from the collapse of housing prices, prolonged high unemployment and resulting declines in revenue. They are confronting soaring demands for spending on public workers' pensions and retiree health care while slashing services, rolling back pay and laying off cops, firefighters and other workers.
So?
penn1954 said:You are so busted !!!
Because a pro-abortion one does?
I've noticed they go away quickly when they've been busted !!:mrgreen:
Hi Ocean & Hi Polgara hope alls well just reading posts.:2wave:
No group should, but since they do, the rules should be applied equally across the political board.