they were abortions, not murders. Though if his negligence lead to the deaths of a mother or two then I could see actually being guilty of murder. Separate is not equal. Since a fetus does not ahve the rights of a human, and it should never have them, it cannot be considered murder or homicide to kill one. but good try for backdooring in precedent. I do hope that attempt doesn't ruin this on appeals for you.
Mein gott. You're so completely wrong about so many things in such a short bit of text.
a) When a child is born, it has rights and legal protection under the law as it stands right now. I may think it's stupid, and I do, but that is what the law is as it stands right now, nationwide.
b) It is always homicide to kill a human. It isn't always murder to kill a human in aggression, unfortunately - see abortion.
c) SAT analogy question reference time.... Fetus : neonate :: magma : lava. If birth has happened, even if that birth was induced through medication, you don't call the human a fetus any longer. Premature neonates come out before they have had the usual entire fetal stage of growth and development inside the womb, that is why they have such a hard time.
they were abortions. No one wanted them to be born, and the mothers chose to abort. Your misrepresentation of facts and reality are noted.
Stop talking about things you clearly know nothing about. Yes, their disgusting wretches of mothers wanted them dead, they hired a serial killer to make them dead, and then that serial killer stepped outside the boundaries of his legal protection to perform his professional role. He can only kill human beings when they are inside the mother's womb, but even then, he killed them so late-term that he was violating state law. He didn't even stop there, though, he violently killed them outside of the womb - not fetuses, but born neonates.
By killing the kids after they were born, he became a murderer under the law as it stands right now anywhere in the nation. In addition to being a serial killer of humans in the fetal stage of life, he crossed the line into becoming a murderer of children. There really shouldn't be a difference, but there is.
I'm not sure how anyone stumbles into an abortion debate without understanding the most basic elements of that debate... how was that ambiguous to you before today? The current standard, long standing, is that a human has legal rights and those rights are protected at birth.