It already has been. Have you not been paying attention to the world? Have you been so caught up in conspiracy theories you've missed the truth?Your argument stems from your hope that some systemic failure can be blamed for the attack in Benghazi.
Does that include all the House Republican Congress people who voted to decrease the money given for the defense? Does that include the current Republican Senators who still are not asking about current defense in other places?People in responsible positions made the decisions which resulted in the attack, and people made the subsequent attempt to hide those decisions - thereby attempting to avoid any culpability. The first step in correcting this is to identify the people who made the decisions, and remove them from positions which require sound judgement and the authority to make decisions involving the well-being of our personel serving abroad.
What happened was tragic, everyone knows this. But what happened was the result of poor preparation, nothing else. Once the attack started, nothing could have saved Stevens and Smith, and it would have been a miracle if Woods and Doherty were still alive. The failure lied in the appropriate preparations for security, that's all. And most likely, the decisions which were made were made to not bolster security were made for legitimate reasons. I find it very hard to believe any American wanted other Americans to die.
Let's quit trying to find someone to fire, especially since Clinton, Patraeus and Panetta are not even in their positions anymore. Let's instead focus our efforts on making sure we minimize the risk of this happening again.
But you are! You're so worried about four people who died months ago you're not paying the slightest bit of attention to those who are still in danger! Your statement here is completely false!As Americans, we don't leave our ambassadors and security twisting in the wind with no recourse but death.
What? Who has done that?We don't let the attackers walk away with no consequence for their acts.
And doing so purely for political gain...I mean, we're to the point where Republicans are whining about e-mails in the immediate aftermath of the attack. It's pathetic people are still listening to anything they say.That some are resorting to endless contortions
You're right, the truth is important. Here's the truth.This event in Benghazi is not one of those. The truth is important here
1) There were breakdowns in preparation for the Benghazi residence.
2) Those breakdowns have been identified, and according to Clinton during her testimony in January, are being resolved.
3) Once the attack started, NOTHING could have saved Stevens or Smith
4) Only by the most idealistic scenarios, which many times push reality to the absolute brink, could anything have been done to save Woods and Doherty.
5) The fact is what happened in Benghazi was tragic and avoidable beforehand, but impossible to save once the attack has started.
6) So we need to spend more time making sure our preparation in other locations prevents attacks, not whining endlessly about e-mails and nearly impossible scenarios.
I just read this article this morning. Perhaps your distaste will subside once you read a common sense account of what happened:While I'm on my soapbox here, I should also mention that the decision not to send help, whether it arrived in time to save lives or not, is one of the most coldly calculating and cruel decisions I can imagine. I can't speak for others, but I know that if I had been on that rooftop in Benghazi fighting for my life and that of others, I would've welcomed the knowledge that help was on the way, that there would be some consequence for the attack in which justice played a role. We didn't even give them that. Not even that, Sly. That's beyond despicable.
Benghazi (II): A military analysis of the Fox mystery man's fantasy rescue plan | The Best Defense
Once you realize that, perhaps you'll realize that endangering more American lives, just for someone to welcome the news, is not only not cold and cruel, but sensitive to the fact risking more American lives which likely would not have saved any in the first place is not only bad policy, it just does not make sense.
EDIT: By the way, help WAS sent. A CIA team from the annex came to the consulate, along with members of Libya's security forces and they removed Smith's body. The team from Tripoli arrived to the annex at about 1:30 a.m., and the surivivng Americans at the annex were evacuated at around 7:30 and 10:30 a.m. Benghazi time.
So not only is your disgust completely lacking in facts, it's downright false.
No, what we're seeing with Benghazi is just how far political parties will stoop to gain power. Any other conclusion but that is false.What we are seeing here in Benghazi is the failure of the Obama Administration's ME foreign policy writ large.
Last edited by Slyfox696; 05-12-13 at 10:16 AM.
[QUOTE=Slyfox696;1061798520]Did you bother to read my post? [QUOTE]
Uhm..... Yeah.....do you think it must have been something you said in order for you to get a response?
Did you seem confused over the fact that no matter what Carney called it.....that others were excluded from it? Can this fact be changed that there were only select people invited? Also the other fact is......all those breakdowns, have NOT been Identified. Which if all listened to the Left and the Democrats. We wouldn't even known the Intel Agencies knew all along like as been validated by both left and right sources.
For if they didn't know something that caused a breakdown. Then surely they cannot address what they do not know, "now".....can they?
Were you confused by the fact you would have to ask them how the 14 news agencies were determined? Were you confused by the fact there were conservative leaning news organizations there also?Did you seem confused over the fact that no matter what Carney called it.....that others were excluded from it?
http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/202446.pdfAlso the other fact is......all those breakdowns, have NOT been Identified.
Please do more reading than just your simple conservative opinion pieces. You can start with the posts of mine that you quote.
Nothing changes those two truths. And we agree preparation should have been better leading up to the attack. You're engaging in partisan games.
That's not what you said and you cannot change what you said because you were wrong. You said no help was sent. Your exact words were "I should also mention that the decision not to send help" You are wrong, help was sent, in three different ways. Quit making this about political parties and just get to speaking about truth.Forgive me for mentioning that the help sent was useless.
IT WAS! Why are you ignoring the truth to continue in political attacks?!You're all about not understanding that an effort should have been mounted the moment the attack began.
Success would have been all but impossible, did you actually read what I linked you to? All that would have been done is put more American lives on the line.Nobody guarantees success, but I can guarantee failure if nothing is done.
Yes, I'm well aware the Republican Party hates people using common sense.And stop with the common sense BS.
Common sense dictates weighing the facts and then making a decision. That's what I'm doing. You're bringing up irrelevant information and using that to make unfounded and downright false claims.Common sense dictates that one should refuse to believe a known liar - or in this case, liars.
What's unraveling? E-mails with changed talking points? How soon the intelligence community knew it was a terrorist attack? Nothing else is unraveling, we already know what happened. Please come out of your hyper-partisan bubble.It's all unraveling Sly.
You have lied about your own words, used unrelated information to make provably false claims and ignored the truth in front of you, and you're asking me to stop defending the indefensible? Really?If you have a shred of decency, you'll stop defending the indefensible.