A) I'm not a liberal and B) Not one of my arguments have been proven false.continue to spew liberal arguments even after they have been proven time and time again to be false
Uhh, I DID respond to that, I did not ignore it. I accurately pointed out that your post here tells me what, not why. Just because they were on their way to board the plane, that doesn't mean they could have gotten there in time. I could board a plane in the next 30 seconds and still not make it to China in 30 minutes. Being on a plane doesn't tell me why I cannot make it to China in 30 minutes.I will give you an example
even after i posted evidence like this
"Lt. Col. Gibson and his team were on their way to board a C-130 from Tripoli for Benghazi prior to an attack on a second U.S. compound " and " 'you can't go now, you don't have the authority to go now.' And so they missed the flight ... "
you still want to claim help wasn't available and couldn't get there in time
I'll give you a parallel example. There's a Mexican restaurant down the road. I'm walking out to my car to drive down to the restaurant and my girlfriend/wife/significant other tells me, "Hey, the car is out of gas, it won't make it to the restaurant".
You're telling me that because I was walking to my car, I should have eaten Mexican. I'm telling you that I COULDN'T get to the restaurant, unless I walked, and if I did walk, the restaurant would be closed.
I didn't ignore you at all, I responded directly to you. Again, you told me what and I told you why (including referencing the links I made earlier in the thread). It's important to know the difference between what and why.