So you agree I don't know why the specific agencies which were there were there? Great. Do you? If not, then do you even have a point anymore?Also.....I would have to agree with you that you don't know what your talking about.
No. You asked a question I had already answered. There was no confusion, just your obvious lack of reading my post.You must have been confused with the Prof and I.
No, you posted a question to me, a question I directly quoted, that I had already answered. You then became annoyed I didn't repeat myself and, after some word twisting by you, here we are.As I have been posting up the ones which showed that Team Obama Lied, Falsified info, changed their Narrative, and when they were the Inept fools like that they are and have showed themselves to be.
You've had your chance to spar with me over Banghazi and you wanted no part of it. Your last post on the subject was in reference to how active the search was in Libya by Libyans (not if it was active, just merely how active and reading it again, I saw nothing which addressed US investigation). Or, at least, that was all I bothered to read (I think I made it through the first line or so), because you selectively posting articles which agree with your opinion and posting them in their entirety is a waste of everyone's time. This came after your absurd comments about why we haven't brought whomever it was in for questioning.Course as usual.....while proving those like yourself. Don't have a clue as to what they are talking about. Either with those here in the US over Benghazi or with those in Libya.
I am actively debating Benghazi right now with another poster. You've shown no real interest in jumping in, mostly because you know I'm 100% accurate. So I suggest you stop with the baseless accusations that I don't know what I'm talking about, when it's clear you do not desire to discuss Benghazi with me. All you want to do is ask why I'm not buying into the ridiculous notion of a conspiracy with the media, and then ignore me when I answer the question.
Last edited by Slyfox696; 05-13-13 at 12:04 AM.
Well, in this thread we were talking about How Carney didn't invite all the of the media. While you talked about Rwing sources. I asked if you were confused on the part if he had invited all new Sources. Especially since he (Carney) had said he had. All that was required was a yes or no answer. Not an Encyclopedic answer that goes tangential.
As far as Benghazi.....your lack of understanding was shown. When you couldn't figure out that part about the Ansar al Sharia. Whom we trained and was part of the Security. Which you aptly say you could NOT comprehend any other information from the Libyans. That you think it doesn't apply to anything that is going on in Libya or about Benghazi.
"He who does not think himself worth saving from poverty and ignorance by his own efforts, will hardly be thought worth the efforts of anybody else." -- Frederick Douglass, Self-Made Men (1872)
Who were there, thus showing this was not a conspiracy between the White House and the media. What part of this is difficult for you to understand?While you talked about Rwing sources.
In the press conference, Carney said 14 news agencies were represented, in video, print and online. I'm not aware of Carney saying all news sources were invited?Especially since he (Carney) had said he had.
All that was required was for you to have read the post of mine you quoted before you asked the same question.All that was required was a yes or no answer.
We never talked about Ansar al Sharia. You seem to have me confused with someone else.As far as Benghazi.....your lack of understanding was shown. When you couldn't figure out that part about the Ansar al Sharia.
No, I've confirmed in every post I want to get past political nonsense and focus on what's important. The fact you want to continue political attacks and not worry about the safety of Americans demonstrate to me exactly where your priorities in this thread are.
Have you read ANYTHING I've posted? Clearly you haven't. In your attempt to sensationalize what I've said, you've not only taken comments completely out of context, but are outright lying.The whole disaster that was Benghazi has been a political effort by the left from start to finish, with some unfortunate deaths involved that are collateral damage nobody could do anything about, and from your perspective, it wasn't any negligence, incompetence, or a devil may care attitude about the deaths.
I've said there was incompetence. I said lies were told. What I'm saying is the incompetence needs to be fixed to protect other Americans. What I'm saying is Republicans are not concerned at all about the incompetence, but rather political implications. If we're going to debate, at least have the decency to not falsely present my argument.
Caused it? No. Contributed to? Yes, just like Democrats contributed to it. That's the difference between you and me...I don't care about blaming either party. Both are responsible, to varying degrees, for what we now have today.In fact, it was the republicans who caused all of this
Could you please tell me what they are actively doing to make sure what happened in Benghazi doesn't happen again? No? Then I think it's pretty clear what purpose Republicans have.and continue to place our facilities overseas in danger.
Indeed I am. Furthermore, I'm not scared to present your argument exactly as you present it, because I don't have to lie about my own words or change your argument. My argument is 100% accurate. The sad part is...what exactly are you scared of? Are you scared people will think you care about making sure Americans are as safe as they can be? Are you scared people will think you're willing to ignore trivialities to focus on what's important?You're a veritable font of logic and common sense.
I honestly have no idea why you're still arguing with me about something which should be common sense for everyone.