Maybe if you make about 20 threads for every update there might be a new stary? Only problem is it seems to be a small group of the same people who keeps touting this as important. Perhaps it will become more interesting or actually be watergate if you guys shout louder? I also noticed that supposedly these guys are going to testify to bring down Obama because the news calls them whistleblowers and says the Obama admin may have threatened them (The Obama admin may also be holding the easter bunny hostage) so it seems that they will be bringing down the admin with their testimony of? Oh wait we don't even know if they will contradict the story given by the Obama admin at all.
Well, i guess it is good you shout victory now, sort of like how you declared victory in the presidential election. It will be much harder to claim victory after they testify and Obama is still around. So have fun with your victory party before the loss. I have to admit given your propensity for fail it is probably the best you can get.
Well, maybe if you put up enough threads the DP staff will make a new place for all the benghazi threads. At this point it has to be more pressing than the zimmerman case. Then we can all put this racket where it belongs. It will be 2020 and you will still be hung up on benghazi. Can't you move onto the new conspiracy theory that obama did the boston marathon bombings? What happened to him stealing your guns? benghazi is old and tired at this point, and we have moved on. Please join us in 2013.
Well, what I am opposed to is to keep investigating over and over despite having a clear answer in hopes that the answer will change to the imaginary scenario you have in your mind. If it does not lead to the execution of Obama, his family, and every person who voted for him you will not be satisfied. There is no resolution that will ever satisfy a tinfoil hat conspiracy nut. Even if their wildest dreams of aliens mating with bigfoot to give birth to Obama in kenya is realized there would be a deeper conspiracy of crazy that they would want to investigate. These investigations are best left to TLC or the history channel and not as a distraction from congress doing their jobs. We do not need to give congress yet another excuse why they should fail to produce a budget, but thanks for helping in that area.
You have no evidence there was anything more than a screw up, and that means you do not even know what you are trying to uncover. Not to mention we have heard the doom to obama claims before. You and your comrades have been claiming the next watergate every other week for the past 4 years and you have not even come close. We heard it every day for over a year before the last election. Every time obama sneezed or some republican said something Obama lost the election. It was the end of his presidency, you promised. Look, this is the chicken little/little boy who cried wolf thing on a countrywide level. It is not the end of the world for Obama, and you have not won. You have not even heard any new evidence or testimony. You have no idea what these guys will say. They could come forth and say obama is a great guy and everything was as he said. Not that it would stop you from crying benghazi every two minutes, but you don;'t even know, and you cannot even speculate on what they might say because you cannot even figure out an alternative that means what you wish it does.
I tell you what. If you want me to end up more in the middle with my comments quit feeding so much insanity into the discussion. I have never said the democrats were good by any stretch like the republicons want us to believe the republicons are honest and good people who have our backs. But that doesn't mean they are near equal in levels of stupidity with the republicans presently. You just paint big giant targets on yourselves with all this tinfoil hat BS. You just invite the calls of insanity and stupidity when you endorse these ignorant and dimwitted fools. You have people claiming women's bodies shut down when they are raped, and you make them the head of your science committee. You are the party of family values and morals and you support people like Sanford and gingrich. You claim fiscal responsibility while the last president from your party tanked a stable and growing economy and put us into a recession and billions in debt with 2 wars and he couldn't touch the boogeyman. You claim to be on the side of the american worker while destroying unions and running a corporate dumbass who had destroyed more american jobs than the japanese in the 80s.
So before you go thinking this is a republican democrat thing, your side is screwed up massively. It is FUBAR. Pretending you are a libertarian while clearly being a republican is not going to help you. It just makes the joke that much more funny because you think calling yourself a lib excuses your blind spot for the reps. Obama sucks, you are correct in that aspect, but he doesn't suck anywhere near as much as the alternatives, and the parts that have really failed have been ideas that came from his republican side like continuing the BS wars, keeping Gitmo open, Going with mandatory private insurance instead of universal health care, and bailing out too big to fail businesses. Just because obama did them doesn't mean those were democrat policies. The dems have their own crap, but it is currently nothing like the stupid coming from your republican heroes. So don't blame me for commenting on the much larger pile of BS you seem to think is a big old pile of gold.
you are missing the D in your name.
First off, the state department is not the military, though they may use military to guard the embasies or consulates. They are not a military attacking force as the military is. Putting some guards for the embassador and the consulate is not actually an invasion. But you also seem to contradict yourself with that ignorance. What do you consider the mistake? Was it that there were diplomats there and that involved him putting some "boots on the ground" for the sake of protection, or was it that there were not enough "boots on the ground." You are doing the dishonest playing of both sides here. Either he was wrong to even start up an embassy and put some military people in the country as you implied in whining about him putting boots on the ground, or he did not put enough troops there to protect the americans you felt should have been there for diplomatixc purposes with the new government we helped to gain power. Pick a side and quit the BS.
But you are dishonest in your representation of the rebellion in libya, and it is not surprising considering how much dishonesty has been shown in this whole area by the right. It was actually quite legal for the president to use discretionary forces to assist in covering our responsibilities and commitments within the UN, and to assist in UN actions which the president may feel are necessary without the approval of congress. Not to mention congress did a big old stupid during the Bush years in an open ended poorly defined declaration of war with terrorism which gave some severely warped military discretional powers to the president. That was all fine by you years ago when bush was in power, but now it is all of a sudden a problem. None of this is illegal and all of it is necessary or permitted by the constitution and congress. You can claim it is illegal and whatnot, but where is the impeachment and sanctions against obama for these things by the republican controlled congress? Why haven't they done anything in a year since this happened? Why haven't they proposed anything in regards to this so called illegal invasion? Well it is because there was no invasion, and obama was within his powers and they know it.
Oh really, and you know this to be fact because of you think it happened that way? Your imaginary friend told you? The voices in your head agree with you? Some guy on the internet told you so? Some guy at faux news thinks it is so? Stop me when i hit the BS reason of your choice. because none of those things matter to me or even constitute anything more than a tinfoil hat conspiracy. Let us say for a moment you actually guessed right, your guesses do not constitute proof in an investigation. You probably couldn't get probable cause to hold up on a faux news story considering how dishonest they are, and there is mounds of proof they have knowingly lied about things. Your personal biases and opinions are not proof. So even if you performed a miracle and actually guessed right on any of these things, this is america and you have to prove it. Beyond that, your opinion is less than reliable. It is most commonly wrong and is obviously biased. So your ideas do not override my common sense which says this was some bad decision making where the US state department overstepped their abilities and got hit for it. On top of that they didn't know all the facts and in an attempt to inform the public told them a theory they were investigating that happened to be wrong. Not an impeachable offense, or even an uncommon one for presidents and the state department. Maybe they should either increase taxes to pay for state department presence in a safer way, or tone back presence in violent countries until they can fund themselves better. Maybe there even was a lie or two going up to the election, but no one was going to pay attention to a couple of white lies with Mittens stream of BS. Mitt lied so damned much he started to confuse himself and forget which lie he was in. he played both sides of every story. perhaps that overshadowed a couple of inconsitencies with obama's story on benghazi. At this point there have been so many lies about benghazi from the right no one can trust you guys.
Oh, and mr. honesty might want to recognize playing the prophet is not something a muslim would do which might tend to influence how a person buys your load of crap.