Looks like you are offended by Obama's ethnicity? Or that he wished a Happy Kwanzaa? And you think that can be used against him?
Now if you take your own partisan blinders off (let's call them Benghazi Blinders) you'd see that the Benghazi coverup was the point.
No the unconscionable actions are those of the Obama administration lying to the American people and a coverup. The blood we see is Obama's as he is at the heart of the scandal.Sorry, but the unconscionable actions are those on the right that think they see blood in the water here and chose to make a mockery out of the noble actions of our diplomats and their paid body guards by sensationalizing the story. This is 95% political. Most of those that feign outrage are doing so only to make their political points.
Now you want to direct our attention away from the Obama's Bengahaze coverup and talk about the homeless. The homeless is another topic for another day and thread.They don't really care any more about the 4 people that die in Benghazi than they do about the homeless man on the corner of Broadway and Main.
I agree with you on this one, everyone on the left bitches about Bush weatherboarding three terrorist. But Obama with his indiscriminate killing with drones is looked over by the left. Obama does not take prisoners, he just kills them along with innocent people, which is looked upon by the left as more humane than sending them to Club Getmo.If you want real scandal, go after the administration for wonton murder of our own citizens and innocent bystanders in foreign countries with these drone strikes.
You can thank Obama for that.Slaughter is what is happening daily with our drone strikes and immoral occupations of foreign countries.
Yeah, lets jump off and do something about it. Lets see, all these shootings you mentioned were done by crazy people, not one was a felon. So to do something about it is to lock up every crazy we have in this country. And of course that would take everyone pointing at a person and say he /she is crazy and lock them up. Is that what we should do?Slaughter what continues to happen in schools in Connecticut, theatres in Colorado and universities in Virginia, but we do nothing about it
Of course the Sequester, is the problem, no, borrowing money we don't have is the problem. With all your complaints that you want to come up with Obama as borrowed close to 7 trillion from the day he took office and will continue to borrow a trillion a yr until he is kicked out of office. But to you liberals borrowing trillions is all OK as long as you don't have to pay for it.what is happening in the Sequester that has cut essential social programs such as cancer assistance funds and meals on wheels
They knew the risk and accepted them, where in the hell did you ever get that idea. They sent in repeated requests for more security and was denied. I'm sure if you were in the battle field and called in air strikes to assist your mission, and they told you "no" we really don't care about a few dozen solders needing help. You knew the risk when you signed up, their would be a day we would tell you to go to hell and if you die so be it.it is what will happen if people think they can roll back the social safety net with budget cuts. These thinks have and will l lead to far more deaths than will ever happen from these embassy (in the case of Benghazi, consulate as it was not an embassy) incursions. Our crew in Benghazi new the risks and accepted them.
As for a scandal in Benghazi you want to brush it aside as though nothing happened. Sorry but a lot happened, lying to the American people, coverup, incompetence, ignorance, threatening witnesses, the list goes on and on and you want to give all that a pass and say we should focus on something else instead.
Liberals - Punish the Successful, Reward the Unsuccessful
Liberals - Tax, Borrow, Spend, and Give Free Stuff
Obama's legacy - National Debt / Credit Downgrade / Obamacare Failure / Economic Failure / Foreign Policy Failure / Liar of the Year Award / The Rise of ISIS
Why would the President talk about Benghazi before the attack on the consulate?
You are correct as Romney didn't mention the Benghazi attack during the first debate as it took place prior to the attack. It was during the second debate that the attack was thrown into the conversation.
So you made a true statement in a manner deliberately intended to mislead most readers, a statement that most would assume meant the period following the attack.
The President had much to say about Libya in 2011 during the revolution that overthrew Qaddafi -so does that count?
“And I have no doubt that every new example will succeed, as every past one has done, in shewing that religion & Govt will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together.”
~ James Madison, letter to Edward Livingston, July 10, 1822
There is no misleading others when I say that Obama didn't bring it up until after 911.
Also you asked why.....would Obama need to talk about it or have Libya and Benghazi on his mind. Here let me refresh your memory.
On September 10 -- at least 18 hours before the attack -- al Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri, in a video timed for the anniversary of 9/11, called for attacks on Americans in Libya to avenge the death of al-Libi.....snip~
http://www.debatepolitics.com/breaki...-get-go-3.html (Official: We knew Benghazi was a terrorist attack "from the get-go")
Did Ayman al-Zawahiri the head of AQ......release a Video in 2011 telling those in Libya to avenge the Death of al-Libi?