Look, its bad enough your President disappeared after he heard HIS AMBASSADOR was under attack. He went AWOL, where abouts unaccounted for.
But since you guys completely let GWB off the hook and only wanted to know "why" and not "who" to what ever contrived criminal accusations you could think of that day, I think we'll just sweep this whole messy affair under the rug.
I mean Hillary told the truth when she wispered into the Navy Seals Fathers ear that day " We will get the guy who made this video.." and the fact that her committee to investigate the Benghazzi attacks is now under investigation, you know the one that totally absolved her of any guilt ? Thats just minor clerical errors I'm sure.
Truth is, what the Obama administration clearly did was unforgivable, it was criminal and yes, they ARE going to be held accountable aside from your mitigations.
When Democrats get wind that their constituents are becoming more and more unerved by this growing crisis, they'll detach themselves from this Chicago thug administration and agree to a special seperate committee with the power to call on witnesses.
and just like with Watergate, this could be the down fall of Obama.....So, in the end call it what you want, it is going to play out.
No.Are you nuts?
And why is that? Are you blaming the President for this as well? Or are you saying there was a process which failed those in Benghazi?A hole was blown in the perimeter wall weeks before the attack, and left unrepaired.
If it's the second, then you're arguing the same thing I am.
What are they going to say that we don't already know? They're going to say there was an attack. They will detail the attack just as it unfolded on the video from the surveillance drone. What exactly are you hoping for?We're going to hear from some witnesses to the event.
What fantasy world is that? Are you saying I'm living in a fantasy world because I want to focus on what can be done to prevent this happening in the future?I suggest you go on a media vacation during that time. I wouldn't want your fantasy world shattered.
No, you want to know why. Knowing who is irrelevant to the why.I want to know who refused assistance to these people
I assume you want the same of any and all Congress people who voted for the war in Iraq? Honest question.and I want them out of government immediately.
But you're not. I want to take care of our own. You want to live in the past.We take care of our own
You've already been told why the decisions were made that were made. So are you really looking for an answer you've already been given?I want to make certain those responsible for the decision to abandon these people are never in such a position again.
I love studying fallacies. I'll be more than happy to educate him again on them.
The mentality of some in this thread is literally to not care about other Americans who are currently serving, but rather attack the President of the United States. Amazing.
Why did that not happen?"Process" is involved in fixing the damn wall? No it isn't. What's involved is locating someone to fix it, getting it fixed, and paying them.
I would hope you recognize the difference between getting a handy man to fix something at your house and what happened there...Homeowners and business owners do it every day.
Clearly there was, and that process failure helped lead to the deaths of Americans.There is no "process" failure.
Okay, let's just get it out of the way.The failure resides properly with those who refused to save four Americans when they could have. The way to prevent such gross dereliction of duty is to make an example of these morally deficient people.
Do you think people in the Obama Administration wanted these four Americans to die? Either say it or not, do you think they wanted Chris Stevens and the others to die?
Nobody cared enough to try to save Woods and Doherty. Stevens and Smith were already dead.
Bush wasn't President; Obama was. Let's stick to facts.