1. Where is your dreaded
INEQUALITY?
2. They do not need a continuing society? Liberal polices in Europe and their impact is being shown to us in real time. The disintegration of the stable traditional family [which is what we are really talkng about here as well ], the promotion of zero population growth aided by abortion policy/practices, the social welfare policies [ which also allow and promote single parent families to the detriment of those families ], now the promotion of couples who cannot independently reproduce themselves, much less achieve zero they go into the negative... I mean it just goes on and on... and we can see it from over here...
How is it not being forced on them, they were not asked... there was no vote by the People... it is forced...
2a.)And again, this false equivalency with the Civil Rights of minorities and women... it simply IS NOT THE SAME.
3. Agreed on the one point. And no, I did not just call a violent protestor insane. Violent protests are situational... some may be sane, we fought a violent Revolution so that we could found this fine country. Was that insane? NO. That is why I place the qualifier generally. I am not into violence, at the same time I understand that a police FORCE is often needed, a strong military is a requirement to deter our enemies and, if necessary to violently fight and beat them. Agreed?
5. Homosexuality used to be illegal, not that long ago, so the criminality argument fails for you, right?
5a.)All that would have to happen is get enough people in congress to pass the right laws and Bam! No more child molesters because it is legal
5b.)[ Sounds similar, taking out the criminality part, to what the legislators just did in France, passing a law without allowing a vote by the people on such an important societal changing matter, right?
5c.) So after they pass that law allowing relations between a 9 year old and an adult man, whose rights are then being infringed? So, double fail there AJ.
7. Don't attempt to label me and how educated I am. I have two degrees, history and poly sci, teach history and economics, have taught American Government, Civics, Law, World History, etc....have more than the equivalent of a minor in English, attended Harvard [ could only afford one semester ] and the best school in the South East [ all at my own expense, not rich here and no desire to be so ] have traveled most of Western Europe by bicycle, North, Central and South America [at my own expense ], have more books in my private library just on politics and history than most people will ever read in five lifetimes...
So why not just prove your points, don't label, let others decide who is and isn't educated on the issues....makes you look bad except to those who already agree, called confirmation bias, by the way.
Comparing principles gets to the bone, buddy... not just your surface stuff like maybe, don't know yet, like maybe you are used to putting out there. The principle either stands up under close scrutiny...or like yours, it does not.
8.)Lets just explore what you were saying, minority right and equality... you were imprecise in your language, do not blame me and would expect you to catch me if similarly imprecise, minorities include ALL MINORITIES my fellow citizen.
THE BIGGEST FAILURE SO FAR IS TO PROVE THAT ANYBODY IS BEING DEPRIVED OF EQUAL RIGHTS... need to work on that AJ