What a vague and completely baseless accusation. Mind actually pointing out where the flaws are, or are you just going to dodge it again?
Agan, lack of depth in the field where this particular area of study is concerned.
Openly homosexual households with children were virtually unheard of before the 1970s. They are still hardly common today.
The claim that we can have anywhere near enough data compiled to make any kind of definitive statement on the merits of homosexual parenting after such a short period (using such a limited sample) is completely laughable.
Why don't you let me in on your secret: What exactly is going to happen if we allow gays to marry and raise children? Don't be shy.
Trouble fitting in with one's peer group, feelings of alienation and inadequacy, possibly a certain degree of gender confusion, etca, etca...
The bolded aspect is the only true part. I've already shown that the gender of the parents is not the vital detail, only that there needs to be two, loving and stable parents.
You have shown nothing of the kind.
Also, I love how you said single gender heterosexuals. Guess we shouldn't let them raise kids, eh?
I wouldn't let them adopt, if that's what you mean.
Unless you've interviewed every gay man/lesbian, or at least a sizable portion of the population in relationship to straight heterosexuals concerning that relationship, then you have no basis to make that claim.
Nonsense. There are mountains of data to suggest that input from both genders is essential to parenting.
Women are naturally more inclined to nurture than men and tend to be far more attentive. Boys raised in fatherless households often grow up predisposed to behavioral problems.
Furthermore, there are lot of conditions specific to the development of each gender that an opposite gender homosexual parent would have no experience with.
What would a gay man know about periods? What would a lesbian know about wet dreams?
Gotta love the social conservative defense "It's just common sense." Such a unspecific answer, with no real counterpoint being made.
Again, because the last several million years of evolutionary history make no difference what-so-ever, right? :roll:
Appeal to tradition is a logical fallacy. Try again.
Bull****. If you want to suggest that tradition is wrong, you're going to have to provide some serious evidence to support that conclusion.
The pro-gay adoption lobby has done nothing of the kind.