I've seen no evidence that the women testifying are the women that the PP person referred to in his statement.However, it is my understanding that the person at trial offering the synopsis of conditions at Gosnell's clinic was one of the women that complained to PP, I could be wrong....In either case would you agree that if these conditions were conveyed to PP then they had an obligation to report them?
so you know that there were 12 complaints and they were all the same?
and you also know that based on that alone that they were factually obligated to do more than they did, tell the woman to report and reported themselves.
Interesting, can you provide these fact please?
oh and lastly none of this change the fact that the thread title is still currently factually wrong and misleading.
did all the complaints go to the same person at pp? were they all documented? etc etc etc
its a HUGE assumption not based on any facts but emotions and opinions.
mean while if any of this stuff turns out to be true i hope that woman is fired and punished by law, but im not going to call for that on speculation.