And of course it didn't help his reputation any that he was a baby killer.
Many pro abortionists need to learn to defend human life more.Many pro lifers need to learn how to tone their anger and hate down...
The first line of defense against pregnancy is the spermicide action of the pills/IUD. The thinning of the uterine wall is a MUCH less effective method of preventing pregnancy. A lot of times if the BC fails to kill the sperm, the egg can manage to implant itself anyway. The combination pill is the only pill I'm aware of that does both (spermicide/thinning of uterine walls).IF the egg attaches itself, then you are pregnant, and the IUD CAN prevent that from occurring but pregnancies still occur once the egg has attached itself.
Others take the pro death position quite seriously indeed.This is why I have a hard time taking the pro life.position seriously
It seems there was sufficient evidence, and was even discussed in an interview with Tiller.If there was sufficient evidence against Tiller I wouldn't hesitate one minute for him be held accountable by the law.
Who is screaming and how can only one side be biased?With that being said, I don't trust most lifers would make a unbaised judgment on this matter for obvious reason. Lifers are screaming this man is a murderer and have been since before he was found innocent of all accusations.
Did you see Tiller or Gosnell outline any "valid reasons"?The law still says a woman cannot abort that late unless for valid reasons, and you still don't're trust the women or the doctor. You never will either. Lifers will always be outside late term abortion clinics, even shouting at dying women, because you think you know she could live and she doesn't need to slaughter her.child.
I think this guy is cooked...During his instructions to the jury, the judge spelled out the state's abortion law and how it defines a live baby as one that is fully expelled from the mother and showing signs of life such as breathing, heart beat or movement.
If a baby shows those signs, he told the jury: "That baby us a human being."
Gosnell's defense contends there is no evidence the babies were alive after they were aborted.
Defense lawyer Jack McMahon, in his closing argument on Monday, cited testimony by Medical Examiner Sam Gulino, who said none of the 47 babies tested randomly from the West Philadelphia clinic had been born alive.
"You may not like that evidence, but it is the evidence," McMahon said.
Assistant District Attorney Edward Cameron said in his closing argument that witnesses testified that one of the aborted babies was breathing before its neck was cut, another made a whining sound and another moved its arms and legs.
"You have three witnesses who saw a baby breathe and move, and he killed it," Cameron said.
Gosnell's attorney argued that the doctor used the drug digoxin that would have killed the fetuses, and any noise or movement would have been involuntary spasms.
Jury weighs fate of abortion doctor in murder trial | Reuters
Americans are so enamored of equality that they would rather be equal in slavery than unequal in freedom.
Alexis de Tocqueville