Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 24

Thread: North Korea lists terms for talks with US and S Korea

  1. #11
    Sage
    cpwill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    USofA
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:30 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    57,148

    Re: North Korea lists terms for talks with US and S Korea

    Quote Originally Posted by AliHajiSheik View Post
    I wasn't aware that South Korea was a US puppet. If that's true, where is my free Samsung suite of products?
    I'm personally curious about these South Korean mistresses serving their American Masters.... There are some pretty beautiful women on SKorea.

  2. #12
    Tavern Bartender
    Constitutionalist
    American's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Last Seen
    12-15-17 @ 10:49 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    76,323

    Re: North Korea lists terms for talks with US and S Korea

    Since when did the US bring nuclear weapons into South Korea?
    "He who does not think himself worth saving from poverty and ignorance by his own efforts, will hardly be thought worth the efforts of anybody else." -- Frederick Douglass, Self-Made Men (1872)
    "Fly-over" country voted, and The Donald is now POTUS.

  3. #13
    Guru
    the_recruit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:10 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    4,178

    Re: North Korea lists terms for talks with US and S Korea

    So, it is the same strategy used by his father before him. Use violent rhetoric as leverage to yield some sort of concession from the West.

  4. #14
    Guru
    the_recruit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:10 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    4,178

    Re: North Korea lists terms for talks with US and S Korea

    Quote Originally Posted by cpwill View Post
    I'm personally curious about these South Korean mistresses serving their American Masters.... There are some pretty beautiful women on SKorea.

  5. #15
    Sage
    EnigmaO01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Indiana
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 09:34 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    7,029

    Re: North Korea lists terms for talks with US and S Korea

    Quote Originally Posted by Jango View Post
    The combined might of US, South Korean and Japanese countermeasures would negate the North's offensive capability. Seoul would not be immune, but she would not fall either, and after a unification battle, likely the capitol of Korea.
    Without a preemptive strike from the South at the first sign of a build up before an attack the North would still have Seoul smoldering in ruin because artillery and missiles are trained on Seoul and it only take minutes to get there. You talk big but you're not realistic. Sure the North would ultimately loose but at what cost?

    The north would have been cleaned up a long time ago if it was not for this dilemma. No one wants to sacrifice 10 million people so they've been tolerating the idiot midget dictators of the north.

    It's just a matter of when hostilities will break out though. Probably a miscalculation from one of the two sides, which will escalate.
    Last edited by EnigmaO01; 04-19-13 at 02:00 AM.

  6. #16
    Sage
    EnigmaO01's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Indiana
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 09:34 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    7,029

    Re: North Korea lists terms for talks with US and S Korea

    Quote Originally Posted by the_recruit View Post
    Looks Japanese to me.

  7. #17
    Guru
    the_recruit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:10 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    4,178

    Re: North Korea lists terms for talks with US and S Korea

    Quote Originally Posted by EnigmaO01 View Post
    Looks Japanese to me.
    What looks Japanese to you? The Korean lady? Or the Korean language she's writing and speaking?

  8. #18
    Angry Former GOP Voter
    Fiddytree's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Last Seen
    Today @ 11:42 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    25,709

    Re: North Korea lists terms for talks with US and S Korea



    Role models are fun.
    Michael J Petrilli-"Is School Choice Enough?"-A response to the recent timidity of American conservatives toward education reform. https://nationalaffairs.com/publicat...-choice-enough

  9. #19
    Sage
    Khayembii Communique's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:52 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    7,900

    Re: North Korea lists terms for talks with US and S Korea

    I don't see how either of these terms are unreasonable.

    "Second, you need to tell the whole world that you will not get involved in any rehearsal for a nuclear war that threatens our nation. Dialogues and war games can never go together," it added.
    What is so "incomprehensible" about that?
    "I do not claim that every incident in the history of empire can be explained in directly economic terms. Economic interests are filtered through a political process, policies are implemented by a complex state apparatus, and the whole system generates its own momentum."

  10. #20
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Michigan
    Last Seen
    01-28-15 @ 06:22 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Left
    Posts
    5,587
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: North Korea lists terms for talks with US and S Korea

    Quote Originally Posted by EnigmaO01 View Post
    Without a preemptive strike from the South at the first sign of a build up before an attack the North would still have Seoul smoldering in ruin because artillery and missiles are trained on Seoul and it only take minutes to get there. You talk big but you're not realistic. Sure the North would ultimately loose but at what cost?

    The north would have been cleaned up a long time ago if it was not for this dilemma. No one wants to sacrifice 10 million people so they've been tolerating the idiot midget dictators of the north.

    It's just a matter of when hostilities will break out though. Probably a miscalculation from one of the two sides, which will escalate.
    I don't think ten million people in Seoul would die if the assault was by the US, South Korea and Japan. Our tech is better than their tech. And obviously goal #1 would be to target their tech that can hurt the coalition, particularly close-by population epicenters. The assault and amount of countermeasures used would be extraordinary.

    Anyway, I think that it's better to go up against the North with an offensive plan, than a defensive one. They've played their hand though, blustering about as they did, threatening everything under the sun. Now they want to talk, but right, they have pre-conditions that are non-negotiable in our country's interest. Like this is going to go anywhere productive.

    No, we soon as well should enact battle plans against North Korea. Or what, kick that can down the road too? Some other generation and some other President's problem - which does not even begin to speak for our allies, South Korea and Japan.

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •