Page 21 of 47 FirstFirst ... 11192021222331 ... LastLast
Results 201 to 210 of 463

Thread: The Senate has defeated a compromise proposal to expand background checks...[W: 349]

  1. #201
    King Of The Dog Pound
    Black Dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    South Florida
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    34,516

    Re: The Senate has defeated a compromise proposal to expand background checks on fire

    Quote Originally Posted by Tom_Joad View Post
    For example, I consider the desire to own or posses an assault rifle by a civilian as prima facie evidence that said individual is mentally unstable and should be barred from owning or possessing any kind of firearm.
    And you would be wrong. Allot of us X military and law enforcement want and do own civilian semi auto versions of military style weapons. We have not been judged mentally deficient. So you would take away someones right because of a tool they want or own? I guess the thought police would like you.
    Quote Originally Posted by Moot View Post
    Benjii likes the protests...he'd be largely irrelevant without them. So he needs to speak where he knows there will be protests against him and that makes him responsible for the protests.
    Quote Originally Posted by Absentglare View Post
    You can successfully wipe your ass with toilet paper, that doesn't mean that you should.

  2. #202
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Last Seen
    10-20-13 @ 04:50 AM
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    3,195

    Re: The Senate has defeated a compromise proposal to expand background checks on fire

    Quote Originally Posted by disneydude View Post
    Take a deep breath and think for a minute. Turn off your right-wing propaganda. No one is coming after your guns. You can stop the hysteria. Despite what FauxNews is telling you....there was nothing about gun grabbing schemes going on.
    The goal of Fascist Liberal Democrats is to disarm lawful Americans

    Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid calls weapons bill 'anti-gun legislation' - Washington Times

  3. #203
    Sage
    disneydude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 07:24 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    25,144

    Re: The Senate has defeated a compromise proposal to expand background checks on fire

    Quote Originally Posted by Zyphlin View Post
    Does it matter though? Haven't you for years on this forum been proclaiming how popular opinion shouldn't dictate what restrictions are placed on Civil Rights? Or is that only the case in terms of civil rights you agree with?
    If it somehow actually unduly curtailed the rights of gun owners, then I would agree with you Zyph. I don't support all out gun bans. If 93% of the population supported a ban on all guns then I would agree that popular option shouldn't dictate what WOULD be an unconstitutional infringement of a civil right.
    <font size=5><b>Its been several weeks since the Vegas shooting.  Its it still "Too Early" or can we start having the conversation about finally doing something about these mass shootings???​</b></font>

  4. #204
    Sage
    disneydude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 07:24 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    25,144

    Re: The Senate has defeated a compromise proposal to expand background checks on fire

    Quote Originally Posted by Black Manta View Post
    And you would be wrong. Allot of us X military and law enforcement want and do own civilian semi auto versions of military style weapons. We have not been judged mentally deficient. So you would take away someones right because of a tool they want or own? I guess the thought police would like you.
    The fact that you would WANT to own a semi-automatic military style weapon speaks otherwise.
    <font size=5><b>Its been several weeks since the Vegas shooting.  Its it still "Too Early" or can we start having the conversation about finally doing something about these mass shootings???​</b></font>

  5. #205
    Sage
    disneydude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 07:24 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    25,144

    Re: The Senate has defeated a compromise proposal to expand background checks on fire

    Quote Originally Posted by Bronson View Post
    The goal of Fascist Liberal Democrats is to disarm lawful Americans

    Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid calls weapons bill 'anti-gun legislation' - Washington Times
    That is nothing more than more of your paranoia propoganda. Take a deep breath and get over your hysterics.
    <font size=5><b>Its been several weeks since the Vegas shooting.  Its it still "Too Early" or can we start having the conversation about finally doing something about these mass shootings???​</b></font>

  6. #206
    Sage
    Anthony60's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Northern New Jersey
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:10 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    7,566

    Re: The Senate has defeated a compromise proposal to expand background checks on fire

    Quote Originally Posted by Tom_Joad View Post
    I would most certainly be in favor of more gun control than we have now.

    For example, I consider the desire to own or posses an assault rifle by a civilian as prima facie evidence that said individual is mentally unstable and should be barred from owning or possessing any kind of firearm.
    This is like the way they used to determine if you were a witch. If you float, you're a witch and they burn you. But, if you sink and drown, you're okay. Lose lose situation.

    A great way for a fascist government to work. Sure, we are not banning an "assault" rifle. But if you even try to get one, we now label you as mentally ill. Maybe they put you away somewhere until you get better. Wow, all of a sudden, nobody even tries to get these, legal, protected, firearms. Alas, 100% compliance.

  7. #207
    King Of The Dog Pound
    Black Dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    South Florida
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    34,516

    Re: The Senate has defeated a compromise proposal to expand background checks on fire

    Quote Originally Posted by disneydude View Post
    The fact that you would WANT to own a semi-automatic military style weapon speaks otherwise.
    No it doesn't. It says I have been trained on the real thing and I like it. I like to take it to the range and shoot it and my many other weapons. The fact is your fear is what is unreasonable.

    How does it feel to live in fear?

    Oh and nice sour grapes on the loss in the senate, hehehe.
    Quote Originally Posted by Moot View Post
    Benjii likes the protests...he'd be largely irrelevant without them. So he needs to speak where he knows there will be protests against him and that makes him responsible for the protests.
    Quote Originally Posted by Absentglare View Post
    You can successfully wipe your ass with toilet paper, that doesn't mean that you should.

  8. #208
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    USA
    Last Seen
    08-25-16 @ 08:28 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    1,622

    Re: The Senate has defeated a compromise proposal to expand background checks on fire

    Quote Originally Posted by Tom_Joad View Post
    I would most certainly be in favor of more gun control than we have now.

    For example, I consider the desire to own or posses an assault rifle by a civilian as prima facie evidence that said individual is mentally unstable and should be barred from owning or possessing any kind of firearm.
    As long as the ban only specifies bonafide assault rifles (M-16, AK-47 etc) no big problem. But as soon as you make semi-automatic, large magazine, folding stock, flash suppressor, bayonet stud, pistol grip or any other cosmetic design to suggest those are assault rifle descriptions, it becomes a stupid and repressive law.

  9. #209
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Last Seen
    10-20-13 @ 04:50 AM
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    3,195

    Re: The Senate has defeated a compromise proposal to expand background checks on fire

    Quote Originally Posted by disneydude View Post
    That is nothing more than more of your paranoia propoganda. Take a deep breath and get over your hysterics.
    Dodge noted

    This is laughable. Liberals have spent months exploiting a tragedy with paranoid propaganda attacking the 2nd Amendment and The Constitution claiming anyone who didn't agree with their radical gun grabbing legislation basically wanted to kill children. You're engaging in projection. It's the ultimate in paranoia to believe that guns in the homes of law abiding Americans pose a threat.

    Criminals don't do background checks. Nothing in any of this legislation would have stopped Sandy Hook. Obama and the Democrats have done nothing more than stand on the corpses of children and exploited the grieving families to push their radical agenda. Instead of focusing on the Economy and Jobs, extremists on the Left have wasted months trying to guilt trip law abiding Americans with their anti gun propaganda and paranoia.

    Pathetic attempts at mocking/humiliation/ad hominems is all can do. Won't work.

    Oh and

    Majority of Americans say guns make homes safer



    Have a nice day

  10. #210
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    USA
    Last Seen
    08-25-16 @ 08:28 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    1,622

    Re: The Senate has defeated a compromise proposal to expand background checks on fire

    Quote Originally Posted by disneydude View Post
    That is nothing more than more of your paranoia propaganda. Take a deep breath and get over your hysterics.
    Who are the paranoid? He who is afraid because I own semi-automatic firearms! I own several semi-automatic firearms; 1 auto-5 Browning 20 gauge shot gun I use for woodcock; 1 auto-5 12 gauge I use for dove with one barrel (Cylinder bore) and with the rifled barrel I use it for wild hogs and deer; 1 Remington 30-06 I use for long range shooting (antelope, sheep, elk); 1 9mm Luger I have hanging on the wall and do not shoot; 1 22 cal Colt Woodsman I use for target practice and plinking.

    Any one who objects to my keeping and bearing those firearms IAW the 2nd is the paranoid one. The real issue here is the typical left winger claims they don't want to eliminate all private firearms yet given the opportunity that is exactly what they want.

    Incremental gun control to get rid of all lawful private firearm ownership is the goal. Daily Kos: How to Ban Guns: A step by step, long term processAn article in the daily Kos, a left wing site.

Page 21 of 47 FirstFirst ... 11192021222331 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •