Page 33 of 46 FirstFirst ... 23313233343543 ... LastLast
Results 321 to 330 of 455

Thread: Judge strikes age restrictions for "morning after" pill

  1. #321
    Educator
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Texas
    Last Seen
    10-20-13 @ 10:54 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    675

    Re: Judge strikes age restrictions for "morning after" pill

    Quote Originally Posted by iguanaman View Post
    Because you will die and all that matters then is how well you took care of your offspring. It's how we survived through those millions of years of evolution. You are obviously a outlier, destined for extinction.
    Got a headline for ya'. We all die. So you think we are a product of evolutionary accidents?

  2. #322
    Traveler

    Jack Hays's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Williamsburg, Virginia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:13 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    54,787
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Judge strikes age restrictions for "morning after" pill

    Quote Originally Posted by head of joaquin View Post
    Don't you love it when conservatives cheer on other conservatives citing idiotic conservative blogs. It's a closed loop of counterfactuality.
    Except for the fact that I'm not a conservative and you ducked the opportunity to deal with the substance of the post, you're spot on.
    "It's always reassuring to find you've made the right enemies." -- William J. Donovan

  3. #323
    Sage
    MoSurveyor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last Seen
    04-13-17 @ 04:36 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    9,985

    Re: Judge strikes age restrictions for "morning after" pill

    Quote Originally Posted by CanadaJohn View Post
    What an idiotic analogy. Of course all medications given in a hospital are by prescription - it's not at all similar to picking up a pill at the local pharmacy. Too stupid.
    Not stupid, it was to point out that insurance companies do cover OTC drugs - as long as they are by prescription. If I'm in the hospital I don't have to pay for the Tylenol the give me, my insurance company does that. I just wanted to point that out before you made some big deal of it.
    Mt. Rushmore: Three surveyors and some other guy.
    Life goes on within you and without you. -Harrison
    Hear the echoes of the centuries, Power isn't all that money buys. -Peart
    After you learn quantum mechanics you're never really the same again. -Weinberg

  4. #324
    The Light of Truth
    Northern Light's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:05 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    4,965

    Re: Judge strikes age restrictions for "morning after" pill

    Quote Originally Posted by nota bene View Post
    So you aren't able to provide stats on any longitutinal studies conducted. No surprise to me; I doubt that there have been any. But you did make reference to foreign studies, so it seems to me that you'd be able to provide links to these. Why aren't you being forthcoming when you've made this claim?

    Let me repeat: We don't know what the effect on pubescent and/or pre-pubescent girls are. We know only that other hormonal "miracle solutions" have been in the long term for adult women, and it is upon this fact that I base my point.

    So to what part of "the pill's" long-term effects and Premarin's and RU-86's and etc. do you object? Are you seriously unable because of your pre-set views to acknowledge legit concerns over hormonal pills' effects on little girls when there is no evidence over the long term that they are safe?

    If you're genuinely concerned about women's--and little women's health--I really don't understand why you're being obstreperous here.
    Can pre-pubescent girls even get pregnant?

    I highly doubt that a single treatment with the morning after bill can impact a young girl's hormones so gravely. Eating processed food or food packaged in plastic likely has a great impact on hormones than that.

  5. #325
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    racial boogie man land
    Last Seen
    11-20-17 @ 08:19 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    2,798

    Re: Judge strikes age restrictions for "morning after" pill

    Quote Originally Posted by head of joaquin View Post
    Again: you have posted the real established medical facts and nothing but chirping crickets from the anti-choice posters. All they can do is assume counterfactuality and then run with it.
    I can't argue either way on the safety of use for the mother, but it's certainly terminal for the unborn child. That sucks.

  6. #326
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Last Seen
    04-10-13 @ 10:09 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    522

    Re: Judge strikes age restrictions for "morning after" pill

    Quote Originally Posted by Northern Light View Post
    Can pre-pubescent girls even get pregnant?

    I highly doubt that a single treatment with the morning after bill can impact a young girl's hormones so gravely. Eating processed food or food packaged in plastic likely has a great impact on hormones than that.
    Then why does anyone pay for the pill? They can just eat processed food.

  7. #327
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Last Seen
    07-16-14 @ 01:18 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    47,571

    Re: Judge strikes age restrictions for "morning after" pill

    Quote Originally Posted by sangha View Post
    From what I've seen posted so far, that's what it says
    Well you have to keep in mind that a lot of side effects of drugs are not realized for years.

  8. #328
    Sage
    sangha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Lower Hudson Valley, NY
    Last Seen
    09-17-17 @ 05:48 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    59,990

    Re: Judge strikes age restrictions for "morning after" pill

    Quote Originally Posted by ChrisL View Post
    Well you have to keep in mind that a lot of side effects of drugs are not realized for years.
    Side effects from long term use is the result of regular use over a long period of time - a situation that is nearly impossible for teen use of MAPs
    Quote Originally Posted by matchlight View Post
    Justice Thomas' opinions consistently contain precise, detailed constitutional analyses.
    Quote Originally Posted by jaeger19 View Post
    the vast majority of folks that need healthcare are on Medicare.. both rich and poor..

  9. #329
    Sage
    MoSurveyor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Last Seen
    04-13-17 @ 04:36 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    9,985

    Re: Judge strikes age restrictions for "morning after" pill

    Quote Originally Posted by ChrisL View Post
    Well you have to keep in mind that a lot of side effects of drugs are not realized for years.
    The drug has been available OTC in Europe to females of all ages for over a decade. If there was evidence of problems (at least over that time-frame) Europe would know about it and remove it or restrict it. Unless you think, as others apparently do, that European countries don't care about their citizens as much as we do?
    Mt. Rushmore: Three surveyors and some other guy.
    Life goes on within you and without you. -Harrison
    Hear the echoes of the centuries, Power isn't all that money buys. -Peart
    After you learn quantum mechanics you're never really the same again. -Weinberg

  10. #330
    Sage
    minnie616's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 05:39 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    14,942

    Re: Judge strikes age restrictions for "morning after" pill

    Quote Originally Posted by Cable View Post
    I can't argue either way on the safety of use for the mother, but it's certainly terminal for the unborn child. That sucks.
    Plan B is safe for an unborn child.
    Plan B does not cause an abortion .
    It only keeps the woman from releasing an egg ( ovulating).
    If the egg has already been released it will not stop fetilization.
    If a girl/ woman is already pregnant it will not harm the zygote/embryo/ fetus.
    When it comes to matters of reproduce health, Politicians and the religious dogma of another faith should never interfere with religious liberty of an individual or her faith.

Page 33 of 46 FirstFirst ... 23313233343543 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •