Page 19 of 163 FirstFirst ... 917181920212969119 ... LastLast
Results 181 to 190 of 1628

Thread: U.S. Adds Only 88,000 Jobs; Jobless Rate Falls to 7.6%[W: 831]

  1. #181
    Pragmatist
    AlabamaPaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Alabama
    Last Seen
    12-08-17 @ 11:17 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    8,834

    Re: U.S. Adds Only 88,000 Jobs; Jobless Rate Falls to 7.6%

    Quote Originally Posted by Kushinator View Post
    I simply have a strong understanding of political economy and international finance. That reality does not support your point of view is irrelevant.
    Why would you want to support a political economy? You're part of the problem, not the solution. Get over your politics and help advance policies to get the economy moving once again...
    I don't often change my signature, but this was just too over the top to let anyone forget with what this country is up against...
    Quote Originally Posted by James D Hill View Post
    I am for gay marriage because it ticks off Jesus freaks and social conservatives. Gays are also good voters because the vote for my side so I fight next to them.

  2. #182
    I'm not-low all the time
    Kushinator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    West Loop
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:01 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    16,261

    Re: U.S. Adds Only 88,000 Jobs; Jobless Rate Falls to 7.6%

    Quote Originally Posted by AlabamaPaul View Post
    Why would you want to support a political economy? You're part of the problem, not the solution. Get over your politics and help advance policies to get the economy moving once again...
    I have no political allegiance what-so-ever. This thread is not about me, and it would be beneficial if you would stick to discussing the topic. I take it you do not fully understand the meaning of the term "political economy." Google is your friend.
    It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion.
    "Wealth of Nations," Book V, Chapter II, Part II, Article I, pg.911

  3. #183
    Traveler

    Jack Hays's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Williamsburg, Virginia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:00 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    54,890
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: U.S. Adds Only 88,000 Jobs; Jobless Rate Falls to 7.6%

    Quote Originally Posted by Kushinator View Post
    Americans are now $10 trillion wealthier under Obama. This is simply a matter of fact!
    And yet millions have given up looking for work, and food stamps are at an all time high. Is it BHO's goal to crush the poorest/weakest to provide $10 trillion for the better off?
    "It's always reassuring to find you've made the right enemies." -- William J. Donovan

  4. #184
    I'm not-low all the time
    Kushinator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    West Loop
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:01 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    16,261

    Re: U.S. Adds Only 88,000 Jobs; Jobless Rate Falls to 7.6%

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Hays View Post
    And yet millions have given up looking for work, and food stamps are at an all time high.
    Which is why financial induced economic downturns, e.g. Great Depression, Great Recession, are much more difficult to circumvent than downturns caused by contractionary monetary policy, e.g. Reagan recession.

    Is it BHO's goal to crush the poorest/weakest to provide $10 trillion for the better off?
    I don't believe that to be so.
    It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion.
    "Wealth of Nations," Book V, Chapter II, Part II, Article I, pg.911

  5. #185
    Pragmatist
    AlabamaPaul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Alabama
    Last Seen
    12-08-17 @ 11:17 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    8,834

    Re: U.S. Adds Only 88,000 Jobs; Jobless Rate Falls to 7.6%

    Quote Originally Posted by Kushinator View Post
    I have no political allegiance what-so-ever. This thread is not about me, and it would be beneficial if you would stick to discussing the topic. I take it you do not fully understand the meaning of the term "political economy." Google is your friend.
    I'm posting to you, not google. If you'd like to end the conversation stop responding. Again, your views are the problem, not the solution...
    I don't often change my signature, but this was just too over the top to let anyone forget with what this country is up against...
    Quote Originally Posted by James D Hill View Post
    I am for gay marriage because it ticks off Jesus freaks and social conservatives. Gays are also good voters because the vote for my side so I fight next to them.

  6. #186
    Traveler

    Jack Hays's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Williamsburg, Virginia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 12:00 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    54,890
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: U.S. Adds Only 88,000 Jobs; Jobless Rate Falls to 7.6%

    Quote Originally Posted by Kushinator View Post
    Which is why financial induced economic downturns, e.g. Great Depression, Great Recession, are much more difficult to circumvent than downturns caused by contractionary monetary policy, e.g. Reagan recession.



    I don't believe that to be so.
    Keep spinning. It's all BHO's partisans have left.
    "It's always reassuring to find you've made the right enemies." -- William J. Donovan

  7. #187
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Last Seen
    10-20-13 @ 04:50 AM
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    3,195

    Re: U.S. Adds Only 88,000 Jobs; Jobless Rate Falls to 7.6%



    Trying to claim there is any good news in regards to this jobs report is like claiming at least there were lifeboats on the Titanic

  8. #188
    I'm not-low all the time
    Kushinator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    West Loop
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:01 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    16,261

    Re: U.S. Adds Only 88,000 Jobs; Jobless Rate Falls to 7.6%

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack Hays View Post
    Keep spinning. It's all BHO's partisans have left.
    I have no political allegiance. Instead of discussing your perception of me, perhaps you can actually address my comments (although i am not expecting much).
    It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion.
    "Wealth of Nations," Book V, Chapter II, Part II, Article I, pg.911

  9. #189
    I'm not-low all the time
    Kushinator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    West Loop
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:01 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    16,261

    Re: U.S. Adds Only 88,000 Jobs; Jobless Rate Falls to 7.6%

    Quote Originally Posted by AlabamaPaul View Post
    I'm posting to you, not google. If you'd like to end the conversation stop responding. Again, your views are the problem, not the solution...
    Your lack of information or familiarity with economics and finance lead you to this belief. I am not here to act as a proxy for your educational obtainment. If you cannot keep up with the discussion, it makes little sense to shift the topic to the character of those who can.
    It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion.
    "Wealth of Nations," Book V, Chapter II, Part II, Article I, pg.911

  10. #190
    I'm not-low all the time
    Kushinator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    West Loop
    Last Seen
    Today @ 02:01 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    16,261

    Re: U.S. Adds Only 88,000 Jobs; Jobless Rate Falls to 7.6%

    Quote Originally Posted by Bronson View Post
    Uninformed opinion is noted.
    It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion.
    "Wealth of Nations," Book V, Chapter II, Part II, Article I, pg.911

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •