If no one is armed, ALL of the people in the school are at the shooter's mercy. They can't fight back because people like you won't allow them that opportunity.Of course it is. You have to decide to fight or flee. You need to know how many intruders there are, where they are, and what their intentions (specifically) might be.
Well, if you could tell me the page # or post #, that would be extremely helpful and I definitely will check it out.Could you please read the long post I posted earlier, the one about having uniformed police officers in the building? Thank you.
No, if the teacher is armed, he/she has a fighting chance. If you leave them unarmed, they are all going to be dead.Yes, you are right. The teacher would most likely be the first one killed.
Wrong. The children wouldn't know unless you told them.Unequivocally false. The children WOULD know and it WOULD have an effect on the environment. If introducing a gun to a situation doesn't change the dynamic in a situation, why bother to have the gun in the first place. Your entire argument is based around the gun changing the dynamic in a situation, why do you think it would not do the same in other situations?