they don't really care about the safety of children OR they have not given the concept much rational thought
Lanza committed first degree capital murder to acquire his weapons. He planned on trying to break the VT record of deaths and he chose the school because he knew it was without any armed defenders.
She wolf would have us believe that someone who premeditates a massacre and has already planned to die is going to be thwarted because a bunch of pimps in office have banned certain guns. She obviously seems oblivious to the effectiveness of the war on drugs or prohibition
But hey, continue on with your insults about being "unable to think something through".
Armed police officers? I'm okay with that now, I think. Armed teachers? Terrible idea.
NRA reveals 'school shield' plan: armed guards on every campus 'will save lives' | World news | guardian.co.ukThe NRA's new list of recommendations include changing local state and district laws to allow school personnel to carry guns – the report even has appended a model state law that would do so. It calls on federal funding to be used to encourage the take up of armed school guards and their training, which would involve between 40 to 60 hours of induction into the use of weapons – with the NRA offering its services as a training institution.
By the way, that was sarcasm and me disagreeing entirely with the idea regulating an item doesn't curtail it's use. My apologies for the aggressive nature of the disagreement, but I do grow tired of the argument you presented.
Yes, because there is NO WAY the gun culture is responsible for the deaths of thousands of people every year. Did you really just say that?
Last edited by Slyfox696; 04-04-13 at 08:45 PM.
I do not support the NRA's proposal. Not at all. I don't think there should be armed guards at the school, especially at tax payer expense. Just remove the gun-free zone. That's it. Let any ordinary regular adult who can already legally carry a gun everywhere else in the city also happen to carry while in the school, rather they work there or not. That's it. That's my whole plan. Remove the gun-free zone. No further action is necessary.
Last edited by Jerry; 04-04-13 at 08:51 PM.
Good try, better luck next time. Could you instead just admit you were wrong and apologize for spreading false information?
I have forgotten more about this topic than I suspect you will ever know. I am a court certified expert on this subject. I have been involved in shootings, defending shooters and doing "postmortems" on defensive or claimed defensive shootings.
I train with one of the leading authorities on active shooters in the nation. Blaming law abiding gun owners for these shootings is pathetic. Those who create gun free zones are far far more culpable but in reality, its the killers who are at fault and people like you want them to operate in a safe environment