- Joined
- Feb 21, 2012
- Messages
- 37,251
- Reaction score
- 10,566
- Location
- US Southwest
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Liberal
Um, no, I already have....in the thread.Perhaps I'm not, so please explain your angle here.
Um, no, I already have....in the thread.Perhaps I'm not, so please explain your angle here.
No, there is no reason to believe it was a hate crime, which BTW, you say you don't believe in.
And if the AB committed it, then they did so for political reasons (ie to intimidate the govt)
But you would know this if you had actually informed yourself by reading the thread instead of making baseless accusations based on ignorance of what was being discussed and why
Wrong. I'm asking you to explain to me how it relates to the topic. Simple really.
Um, no, I already have....in the thread.
It's an example of rightwing terrorism
And how on earth would you know the motive behind the crime? Are you a mind reader or something? How do you know it wasn't personal?
Simply a lie
You agreed that the argument was motivated by partisanship. You can deny that all you want.
In this thread, we're used to seeing denial
You are obviously unfamiliar with the history of the DA's office and the AB
But you could fix that by reading the thread. It's all been explained.
Several times
I agreed that YOU are a partisan. . . along with several others. Come on, it's SO obvious, but that isn't the topic. You still haven't explained how you know the motive behind the crime.
I'm not really sure what the point is except that it's partisan and dumb.
You are not here to discuss, you are here to complain, divert, lie about wanting to get back to the topic...on and on.....you are most definitely NOT interested in carrying on a conversation...at all.Okay then. If you don't want to or cannot explain yourself, then don't quote me anymore. There is nothing further to discuss with you apparently.
You are obviously unfamiliar with the history of the DA's office and the AB
But you could fix that by reading the thread. It's all been explained.
Several times
You are not here to discuss, you are here to complain, divert, lie about wanting to get back to the topic...on and on.....you are most definitely NOT interested in carrying on a conversation...at all.
Why don't you tell us what you understand about the crime, and tell us how we are wrong.I read the OP. Where are you getting your special information from?
You are not here to discuss, you are here to complain, divert, lie about wanting to get back to the topic...on and on.....you are most definitely NOT interested in carrying on a conversation...at all.
You are not here to discuss, you are here to complain, divert, lie about wanting to get back to the topic...on and on.....you are most definitely NOT interested in carrying on a conversation...at all.
I know the reason for that.....the question is do you know why you could not?Not with you anyways.
Why don't you tell us what you understand about the crime, and tell us how we are wrong.
I know the reason for that.....the question is do you know why you could not?
The obvious problem is not me, it is you, you have already been told where to find it AFTER you claimed you read the thread. That is a lie.Hey, it's not my fault that you won't explain your position or why you have come to the conclusions that you have. Obviously you're the one with a problem.
That is a lie. Here is the post you agreed with
Note that you agreed that the point is partisan.
I already have...in the thread....which you claimed to have read.Why don't YOU answer just ONE of my questions before you have the arrogance to start questioning me.
Why don't YOU answer just ONE of my questions before you have the arrogance to start questioning me.
Is the last 4 pages an example of your abilities?Please, you couldn't argue your way out of a paper bag. :roll:
The obvious problem is not me, it is you, you have already been told where to find it AFTER you claimed you read the thread. That is a lie.
Is the last 4 pages an example of your abilities?
FFS!