- Joined
- Nov 11, 2011
- Messages
- 12,895
- Reaction score
- 2,909
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Slightly Conservative
Of course you would say that. You are determined to minimize every fact that refutes your claims.
1) I'm pretty sure I'll manage being proven wrong on the internet.
2) No, a bad argument is a bad argument. This is true regardless of what I want
The link I posted describes AB as engaging in terrorism. The SPLC says their activities are primarily criminal, but that they also engage in terrorism
Nope, it described an alleged incident where someone asked about explosives to attack federal building. Building that house investigative agencies and agencies that handle prosecutions at the federal level, So even if true, it could still be a criminally motivated act
No, my link describes three terrorist crimes, and the one you refer to is explicitly describe as terrorism
Only one alleged incident involved actual planning from the organization, as opposed to activities carried out by it's members.
If someone from the cartels decides to kill a republican because he personally hates his politics, that doesn't change the fact the cartels are a criminal gang and are not really interested in politics, beyond how it impacts their criminal activities