• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Texas DA, wife killed -- 2 months after his deputy is gunned down [W:627]

sangha said:
No, there is no reason to believe it was a hate crime, which BTW, you say you don't believe in.

And if the AB committed it, then they did so for political reasons (ie to intimidate the govt)

But you would know this if you had actually informed yourself by reading the thread instead of making baseless accusations based on ignorance of what was being discussed and why
Click to expand...

And how on earth would you know the motive behind the crime? Are you a mind reader or something? How do you know it wasn't personal?
 
ChrisL said:
Wrong. I'm asking you to explain to me how it relates to the topic. Simple really.
Click to expand...

Simply a lie

You agreed that the argument was motivated by partisanship. You can deny that all you want.

In this thread, we're used to seeing denial
 
Gimmesometruth said:
Um, no, I already have....in the thread.
Click to expand...

Okay then. If you don't want to or cannot explain yourself, then don't quote me anymore. There is nothing further to discuss with you apparently.
 
ChrisL said:
And how on earth would you know the motive behind the crime? Are you a mind reader or something? How do you know it wasn't personal?
Click to expand...

You are obviously unfamiliar with the history of the DA's office and the AB

But you could fix that by reading the thread. It's all been explained.

Several times
 
sangha said:
Simply a lie

You agreed that the argument was motivated by partisanship. You can deny that all you want.

In this thread, we're used to seeing denial
Click to expand...

I agreed that YOU are a partisan. . . along with several others. Come on, it's SO obvious, but that isn't the topic. You still haven't explained how you know the motive behind the crime.
 
sangha said:
You are obviously unfamiliar with the history of the DA's office and the AB

But you could fix that by reading the thread. It's all been explained.

Several times
Click to expand...

I read the OP. Where are you getting your special information from?
 
ChrisL said:
I agreed that YOU are a partisan. . . along with several others. Come on, it's SO obvious, but that isn't the topic. You still haven't explained how you know the motive behind the crime.
Click to expand...

That is a lie. Here is the post you agreed with

nota bene said:
I'm not really sure what the point is except that it's partisan and dumb.
Click to expand...


Note that you agreed that the point is partisan.
 
ChrisL said:
Okay then. If you don't want to or cannot explain yourself, then don't quote me anymore. There is nothing further to discuss with you apparently.
Click to expand...
You are not here to discuss, you are here to complain, divert, lie about wanting to get back to the topic...on and on.....you are most definitely NOT interested in carrying on a conversation...at all.
 
sangha said:
You are obviously unfamiliar with the history of the DA's office and the AB

But you could fix that by reading the thread. It's all been explained.

Several times
Click to expand...

LOL! As if YOU read every post in every thread before you post in a thread? Good Lord! Talk about dishonesty. :roll: I suppose I'm the unreasonable one for not wanting to read 59 pages of posts as opposed to asking you for a simple explanation. My bad.
 
Gimmesometruth said:
You are not here to discuss, you are here to complain, divert, lie about wanting to get back to the topic...on and on.....you are most definitely NOT interested in carrying on a conversation...at all.
Click to expand...

Not with you anyways. :)
 
ChrisL said:
I read the OP. Where are you getting your special information from?
Click to expand...
Why don't you tell us what you understand about the crime, and tell us how we are wrong.
 
Gimmesometruth said:
You are not here to discuss, you are here to complain, divert, lie about wanting to get back to the topic...on and on.....you are most definitely NOT interested in carrying on a conversation...at all.
Click to expand...

You aren't either. If you were, you'd provide a cheerful summary of the 20+ pages of this thread that you hijacked.
 
Gimmesometruth said:
You are not here to discuss, you are here to complain, divert, lie about wanting to get back to the topic...on and on.....you are most definitely NOT interested in carrying on a conversation...at all.
Click to expand...

Hey, it's not my fault that you won't explain your position or why you have come to the conclusions that you have. Obviously you're the one with a problem.
 
Gimmesometruth said:
Why don't you tell us what you understand about the crime, and tell us how we are wrong.
Click to expand...

Why don't YOU answer just ONE of my questions before you have the arrogance to start questioning me.
 
ChrisL said:
Hey, it's not my fault that you won't explain your position or why you have come to the conclusions that you have. Obviously you're the one with a problem.
Click to expand...
The obvious problem is not me, it is you, you have already been told where to find it AFTER you claimed you read the thread. That is a lie.
 
sangha said:
That is a lie. Here is the post you agreed with




Note that you agreed that the point is partisan.
Click to expand...

If it isn't partisan, then explain please.
 
ChrisL said:
Why don't YOU answer just ONE of my questions before you have the arrogance to start questioning me.
Click to expand...
I already have...in the thread....which you claimed to have read.

I have read this thread, you have not posted anything related to your own views of motive.....and I doubt you have any substantial knowledge about the crimes commited
 
ChrisL said:
Why don't YOU answer just ONE of my questions before you have the arrogance to start questioning me.
Click to expand...

I have answered several of your questions and in return have been insulted and lied to.

And now you wonder why you're not getting any more answers?

Connect the dots
 
Gimmesometruth said:
The obvious problem is not me, it is you, you have already been told where to find it AFTER you claimed you read the thread. That is a lie.
Click to expand...

Like I said, if you're not willing or able to explain and/or defend your position, then we have nothing more to discuss here. My question is pretty simple and straightforward, how do you know the motive?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom