Not going to go into the usual SSM argument (as there are already many threads on the subject), so I will just say I think it is premature for a magazine to declare something like this. As much as I like saying the same thing, call me old fashion, but I like my journalism to be somewhat real. This issue still has a long way to go and we won't find out for months what the verdict is on this so for TIME to do this is definitely premature and they need to be knocking on wood at this point.