• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

FAU Student Claims He Was Suspended For Refusing To Step On Jesus

The fact that this story got into the rightwing blogosphere, in a garbled fashion of course (that's the only way the rightwing noise machine works) is because it's being used as part of the conservative attack on liberal education, academic freedom, and intellectual inquiry.

The right deeply hates America's colleges and the freedom on inquiry they uphold, so it is part of the rightwing agenda to attack and destroy academic freedom. That's why the leeched onto this "story". And in fact, that's the real story -- the continuing rightwing attack on academic freedom. The boy who thought a piece of paper was really Jesus needs to grow up.

this forum either supports that argument, or the possibility that right whingers don't understand much about higher education.
 
because it would not demonstrate to THESE students how powerful a word is.

That's ridiculous and your assessment on right wingers not understanding "higher education " is based on what ? That we can see easily see through the waves of bull **** narratives that come out of the left wing posters here ? That we somehow have the innate ability to see through everything from the left wing claims of a "economic recovery" to this issue ?

It's not innate, it comes from defining our ideology with truth first, not using our ideology to define the truth, as so many on the left are guilty of.

As it turns out there is more than one way to teach the "value" of a word. How about write "Obama's" name on it ? Or "Muhammad's" name on it ? Or write "gay marriage" on it ?

You savy ? No what this and every other political forum and left wing blog have demonstrated is just how corrupt and disengenuos the left are and to what ends they're prepared to go to to spread their cancer. Its a losing proposition for your ilk.
 
That's ridiculous and your assessment on right wingers not understanding "higher education " is based on what ? That we can see easily see through the waves of bull **** narratives that come out of the left wing posters here ? That we somehow have the innate ability to see through everything from the left wing claims of a "economic recovery" to this issue ?

I stated that: this forum either supports that argument, or the possibility that right whingers don't understand much about higher education.

so my assessment, obviously, was based on the comments of right wingers on this forum. Obviously it does not apply to all right wingers. I have known many who are quite erudite and capable of engaging in critical thinking.

just not on this forum ... or at least not on this thread....

It's not innate, it comes from defining our ideology with truth first, not using our ideology to define the truth, as so many on the left are guilty of.

As it turns out there is more than one way to teach the "value" of a word. How about write "Obama's" name on it ? Or "Muhammad's" name on it ? Or write "gay marriage" on it ?

your comments here further illustrate my point.

You savy ? No what this and every other political forum and left wing blog have demonstrated is just how corrupt and disengenuos the left are and to what ends they're prepared to go to to spread their cancer. Its a losing proposition for your ilk.

thanks again for the evidence. :)
 
The kids obviously didn't belong at a University.

I'm guessing he was home schooled.
 
I'm thinking that there is a problem with your interpretation of what was going on here. A course on intercultural communications would be looking at the importance of cultural symbols. you need to look at the events in the classroom in that context. I also helps if you don't take one side of the story at face value, until you've heard the other side as well.

the University stated that

“We can confirm that no student has been expelled, suspended or disciplined by the university as a result of any activity that took place during this class,”

however it appears that there is an allegation of misconduct against the student:

"Rotela is facing a litany of charges – including an alleged violation of the student code of conduct, acts of verbal, written or physical abuse, threats, intimidation, harassment, coercion or other conduct which threaten the health, safety or welfare of any person.”

“In the interim, you may not attend class or contact any of the students involved in this matter – verbally or electronically – or by any other means,”

so .... it doesn't appear he misbehaved in class (and I seriously doubt that he would have been "ordered" to stomp on the piece of paper), but at another - or other - times.

he may have argued that the class was the catalyst for his problematic behavior.

in general, when disciplinary action is taken against students in a university it is not done so lightly.

It seems that what you - and he - are doing is trying to justify unacceptable behavior on the part of a student.

So catch me up to speed please because I haven't read yet anything about what the student did in class that got him booted. Links?

I have also been unable to read FAU's student conduct code (although I provided the link to this earlier in the thread) and have wondered why. Each institution has its own conduct code, but it's not wise to assume that a university doesn't act "lightly." You cannot know until you've read the conduct code.

In the institutions with which I am intimately familiar, the professor decides what is "incivility" and can instantly boot a student from a class with that student being barred from returning until there is a resolution. This is usually resolved in a meeting between the prof and student, not in a hearing. That's a later step that follows a meeting with the prof's department chair. If that doesn't yield a resolution, the next step is a dean. If this fails, then there may be a "hearing."

But there may not be one. I've seen incivility issues travel all the way up to the office of a university president without there being a "hearing" as well as, extremely rarely, a hearing with attorneys present.
 
So catch me up to speed please because I haven't read yet anything about what the student did in class that got him booted. Links?

I have also been unable to read FAU's student conduct code (although I provided the link to this earlier in the thread) and have wondered why. Each institution has its own conduct code, but it's not wise to assume that a university doesn't act "lightly." You cannot know until you've read the conduct code.

In the institutions with which I am intimately familiar, the professor decides what is "incivility" and can instantly boot a student from a class with that student being barred from returning until there is a resolution. This is usually resolved in a meeting between the prof and student, not in a hearing. That's a later step that follows a meeting with the prof's department chair. If that doesn't yield a resolution, the next step is a dean. If this fails, then there may be a "hearing."

But there may not be one. I've seen incivility issues travel all the way up to the office of a university president without there being a "hearing" as well as, extremely rarely, a hearing with attorneys present.

from an op-ed piece in the Palm Beach Post but I think this bit I quote is objective
Rotela refused to participate and then complained to FAU administrators who suspended him, alleging that he threatened Poole. Rotela’s attorney, Hiram Sasser of the Liberty Institute — “dedicated solely to defending and restoring religious liberty in America” — said Rotela “told the professor he was offended and not to ever do that again. That he was going to report what the professor did to his superior and to the public and that he was going to be hearing from him again. That was what the professor sort of turned into the threat.”


I don't know the individuals involved, I have no connection with FAU.

Not knowing the student, it is impossible for me to say whether or not Rotela's words to Prof Poole, "You'll be hearing from me again.", should be construed as a threat or not - in some instances such words have led to bad situations, although in most cases nothing happens.

The entire incident just seems to have been pre-planned IMO.
 
The kids obviously didn't belong at a University.

I'm guessing he was home schooled.

As opposed to what? A public school education? We know the American public school system is the envy of the world, after all.
 
So catch me up to speed please because I haven't read yet anything about what the student did in class that got him booted. Links?

which bit of

“We can confirm that no student has been expelled, suspended or disciplined by the university as a result of any activity that took place during this class,”

don't you understand?

I have also been unable to read FAU's student conduct code (although I provided the link to this earlier in the thread) and have wondered why. Each institution has its own conduct code, but it's not wise to assume that a university doesn't act "lightly." You cannot know until you've read the conduct code.

the general standards are very similar. the article refers to him facing an alleged violation of the student code of conduct, AND "acts of verbal, written or physical abuse, threats, intimidation, harassment, coercion or other conduct which threaten the health, safety or welfare of any person.” In any institution, these actions would be grounds for student discipline.

Further, it also states:

“In the interim, you may not attend class or contact any of the students involved in this matter – verbally or electronically – or by any other means,”

This suggests that he was engaged in harassment - most likely of the staff member - possibly of other students. This is unacceptable in the workplace, or in an educational institution. the kid needs to grow up.

the institutions with which I am intimately familiar, the professor decides what is "incivility" and can instantly boot a student from a class with that student being barred from returning until there is a resolution. This is usually resolved in a meeting between the prof and student, not in a hearing. That's a later step that follows a meeting with the prof's department chair. If that doesn't yield a resolution, the next step is a dean. If this fails, then there may be a "hearing."

that sounds pretty normal ... but can you show me where it says that he was "booted" from the class by the professor?

I can speculate on what might have happened (and there are several possible scenarios), but I don't know exactly what happened any more than you do. however I do know that there are cases where the teacher can feel so intimidated by an aggressive student that they may not even be the one who decides to exclude the student. The decision may be made at school , faculty or even university level in the case of a student whose behavior is seriously disturbing or disruptive.

But there may not be one. I've seen incivility issues travel all the way up to the office of a university president without there being a "hearing" as well as, extremely rarely, a hearing with attorneys present.

In my experience discipline hearings are relatively rare. In the vast majority of cases in any university I have been involved with these issues are generally resolved at the local level, or perhaps at the Faculty level. Like you I am familiar with cases that have by passed a committee on gone directly to the VC - not very often, though. These cases are usually those which need to be handled carefully, due to the fragility of the student. The cases that I am familiar with that have gone on to a hearing are those where the behavior has significant consequences and/or the student refuses to take any responsibility for their action
 
which bit of

“We can confirm that no student has been expelled, suspended or disciplined by the university as a result of any activity that took place during this class,”

don't you understand?



the general standards are very similar. the article refers to him facing an alleged violation of the student code of conduct, AND "acts of verbal, written or physical abuse, threats, intimidation, harassment, coercion or other conduct which threaten the health, safety or welfare of any person.” In any institution, these actions would be grounds for student discipline.

Further, it also states:

“In the interim, you may not attend class or contact any of the students involved in this matter – verbally or electronically – or by any other means,”

This suggests that he was engaged in harassment - most likely of the staff member - possibly of other students. This is unacceptable in the workplace, or in an educational institution. the kid needs to grow up.



that sounds pretty normal ... but can you show me where it says that he was "booted" from the class by the professor?

I can speculate on what might have happened (and there are several possible scenarios), but I don't know exactly what happened any more than you do. however I do know that there are cases where the teacher can feel so intimidated by an aggressive student that they may not even be the one who decides to exclude the student. The decision may be made at school , faculty or even university level in the case of a student whose behavior is seriously disturbing or disruptive.



In my experience discipline hearings are relatively rare. In the vast majority of cases in any university I have been involved with these issues are generally resolved at the local level, or perhaps at the Faculty level. Like you I am familiar with cases that have by passed a committee on gone directly to the VC - not very often, though. These cases are usually those which need to be handled carefully, due to the fragility of the student. The cases that I am familiar with that have gone on to a hearing are those where the behavior has significant consequences and/or the student refuses to take any responsibility for their action

I don't really appreciate your insinuating that I'm dumb by asking what part of the quote I don't understand. But I'll answer you fairly. The OP states that the student was suspended from class, hence my use of the term "booted."

What you've quoted "no student has been expelled, suspended or disciplined by the university." Suspended from the university is very different from suspension from class.

In any event, FAU has publicly apologized to the student, and this indicates that Poole's decision wasn't supported by the suits. I'm still interested in learning what other students in the class observed, but the institution apparently couldn't support Poole's claim.
 
I don't really appreciate your insinuating that I'm dumb by asking what part of the quote I don't understand. But I'll answer you fairly. The OP states that the student was suspended from class, hence my use of the term "booted."

What you've quoted "no student has been expelled, suspended or disciplined by the university." Suspended from the university is very different from suspension from class.

In any event, FAU has publicly apologized to the student, and this indicates that Poole's decision wasn't supported by the suits. I'm still interested in learning what other students in the class observed, but the institution apparently couldn't support Poole's claim.

you might find this interesting ...
Florida Atlantic University has maintained for a week now that no student was suspended for refusing to participate in an exercise in which students were told to write "Jesus" on a piece of paper and to stand on it. And for a week now, the lawyer for one student has been saying that the university suspended his client for objecting to the lesson. Florida's governor and numerous other politicians have also joined the discussion, denouncing the lesson that was used, and demanding to know why the student was suspended.

But the president of the faculty union at Florida Atlantic asserted in an interview with Inside Higher Ed Thursday that the university has neglected to explain that the student faced charges for making a threat against the instructor. Chris Robé, the head of the faculty union, said he has spoken to the instructor, Deandre Poole.

Robé -- who did not name the student -- said that Poole has been ordered by the university not to talk to any reporters, and is thus unable to defend himself, even as he has been widely criticized as anti-Christian (among other things). Poole is non-tenure-track, working on a one-year contract. Conservative activists are calling for him to be fired.

"He's been under a gag order, and the story has been framed all wrong," Robé said.

The reason the student faced charges, Robé said, was that "the instructor was verbally threatened," not because the student objected to the Jesus exercise. "He faced a hearing over that."

Robé said that faculty members have been frustrated that the university has been repeatedly apologizing for the lesson that the student objected to, without "talking to faculty members about what really went on."


Read more: Why was the FAU student suspended in the 'Jesus' case? | Inside Higher Ed
Inside Higher Ed

I will see if I can find what other students have said as well.
 
If progressives are so amused by this "task" how would they feel if they were told to jump on MLK's head? maybe Muhammad's (if you were allowed to draw "him" in the first place?) JFK, LBJ, Carter, Clinton, Che Guevara, Obama, Mao, Lenin., Stalin, Castro, Nancy Pelosi?

OH that would be biased or racist in your minds now wouldn't it?? yeaaaaaaaahhhhh - it would be front page news on every mainstream news media outlet.

Naw, it's a black guy telling a white Mormon male to stomp on Jesus - makes perfect sense to the communists and those who are on the mainstream hate bandwagon who beg for tolerance.
 
If progressives are so amused by this "task" how would they feel if they were told to jump on MLK's head? maybe Muhammad's (if you were allowed to draw "him" in the first place?) JFK, LBJ, Carter, Clinton, Che Guevara, Obama, Mao, Lenin., Stalin, Castro, Nancy Pelosi?

OH that would be biased or racist in your minds now wouldn't it?? yeaaaaaaaahhhhh - it would be front page news on every mainstream news media outlet.

Naw, it's a black guy telling a white Mormon male to stomp on Jesus - makes perfect sense to the communists and those who are on the mainstream hate bandwagon who beg for tolerance.

apart from the fact that stomping on a piece of paper is not the same as stomping on someone's head (maybe you don't understand that ... but most people do ...) if you are substituting all these other names, that only underlines that you can't grasp the purpose of the exercise in the first place.

....

do you think that threats of violence against prof poole can be justified?

BOCA RATON, Fla. --The Florida Atlantic University professor who reportedly had students write the name "Jesus" in large letters on a piece of paper, put it on the floor and stomp on it has been placed on administrative leave for his safety, according to university officials.

As a result of the reaction to the "Jesus stomping" exercise in Dr. Deandre Poole's intercultural communications class, his personal safety is compromised, FAU said.

FAU said this decision will prevent further disruption to the day-to-day operations at the university.


Read more: Dr. Deandre Poole, Florida Atlantic University professor in 'Jesus stomping' debacle, put on leave
 
do you value freedom of speech?

As Mary Katharine Ham, my debating partner on "The O'Reilly Factor," correctly noted during the segment, Americans have a right to say they don’t like stepping on Jesus’ name. But stopping the academic exercise is wrong.

The reaction against FAU and the teacher strikes me as an attempt to shut down free speech and silence educators who use provocative teaching methods.

Look on the Internet and you will see people calling for the teacher to be fired.

That disturbs me. What these critics want is to suppress free speech. That’s not Christian. That’s not American.


Read more: In defense of Florida university's 'Jesus stomping' exercise | Fox News
 
apart from the fact that stomping on a piece of paper is not the same as stomping on someone's head (maybe you don't understand that ... But most people do ...) if you are substituting all these other names, that only underlines that you can't grasp the purpose of the exercise in the first place.

....

Do you think that threats of violence against prof poole can be justified?


no it is the same as stomping on jesus's head - the message is quite clear, and it doesn't take an idiot to realize that on easter sunday.

If it matters to you - i will fly an upside down us flag all day everyday but will never let it touch the ground (if it did i'd burn it). You know why? Nope you don't.
 
I do find it very interesting .... where are the Christians speaking out about the reactions of their extremist brethren?
The Florida Atlantic University instructor involved in the controversial "stomp on Jesus" class assignment has been placed on paid leave, with the school citing concerns for his safety.
Communications instructor Deandre Poole, who is black, has had death threats and racially charged messages left on his voice mail and in his email, said Chris Robe, president of the FAU chapter of the faculty union.

pixel.gif



pixel.gif

"I've never seen anything like it on campus, the vitriol that has been released on this guy," said Robe, an assistant professor of communications.
Poole, who could not be reached for comment Friday, has been the subject of numerous derogatory postings on blogs and Twitter, many of which give out his FAU email address.
"As a result of the reaction to a recent exercise in Dr. Poole's intercultural communications class, the instructor's personal safety has been compromised," according to a university statement released Friday. "In addition, this decision will prevent further disruption to the day-to-day operations of Florida Atlantic University.''
During a March 4 class on the Davie campus, Poole asked students to write Jesus on a sheet of paper, throw it on the floor and then step on it. It was part of a lesson on the impact of words included in the instructor's guide of the class textbook, written by a professor at St. Norbert College in Wisconsin.
The exercise attracted national attention after Ryan Rotela, a student in the class, informed the media. FAU apologized March 22 and said the assignment wouldn't be used again. On Tuesday, Gov. Rick Scott asked the State University System to investigate the matter and called Rotela to apologize.
Rotela, reached Friday, said he was shocked to learn Poole may be facing threats to his safety.
"Leave the poor guy alone. I'm pretty sure he's been through enough," Rotela said. "People make mistakes. He shouldn't be demonized or killed for it."
No reports of threats against Poole have been filed with FAU police, but "other agencies may have them," university spokeswoman Lisa Metcalf said.
Poole is also an adjunct professor who teaches a speech communication class at Broward College in Davie. A college spokeswoman couldn't be reached Friday evening as to his status there.
It's unusual but not unprecedented to place an instructor on paid leave over safety concerns, said Jenn Nichols, of the Washington D.C.-based American Association of University Professors.
"If there's a threat of immediate harm, the university has to act on that," Nichols said.
Poole is a non-tenured faculty member and FAU won't say whether his one-year contract will be renewed next year.
Faculty are concerned about FAU's reaction to the incident, Robe said. After first defending the assignment, the university promised not to use it again. But professors don't vet their class assignments with administrators, he said, and academic freedom is included in the collective bargaining agreement.



pixel.gif

"Someone being offended does not give the university the right to censor," he said. "Part of the mission of the modern university is to discuss controversial topics in a respectful fashion. Once that's compromised, people are going to be afraid to discuss anything that someone finds offensive."
Florida Atlantic University places instructor of "stomp on Jesus" assignment on paid leave - Sun Sentinel
 
do you value freedom of speech?

Sorry but forcing an individual to stomp on Jesus for class credit goes waaay beyond free speech..... The clown that attempted such an act should be fired. Nooo he wont be because progressives love it....

Freedom of Speech is KNOWINGLY AND WILLINGLY stepping on an (I suppose in this case an object) without coercion or threat... Big flippin difference buddy...
 
no it is the same as stomping on jesus's head - the message is quite clear, and it doesn't take an idiot to realize that on easter sunday.

If it matters to you - i will fly an upside down us flag all day everyday but will never let it touch the ground (if it did i'd burn it). You know why? Nope you don't.

I don't get your point .....

you said:

"If progressives are so amused by this "task"how would they feel if they were told to jump on MLK's head? maybe Muhammad's (if you were allowed to draw "him" in the first place?) JFK, LBJ, Carter, Clinton, Che Guevara, Obama, Mao, Lenin., Stalin, Castro, Nancy Pelosi?"


....I was responding to that.
I could certainly stomp on a piece of paper with any of those names on, none of them have any particular significance to me .... but to jump on someone's (anyone's)head?

that is completely different.

don't you understand that?
 
Sorry but forcing an individual to stomp on Jesus for class credit goes waaay beyond free speech..... The clown that attempted such an act should be fired. Nooo he wont be because progressives love it....

Freedom of Speech is KNOWINGLY AND WILLINGLY stepping on an (I suppose in this case an object) without coercion or threat... Big flippin difference buddy...

I class you as the same as those muslims who get all fired up about cartoons.

I say that, because you seem to be as willing to check facts as they tend to be.... your indignation is over what you imagine to be the case.

I wonder what you would do if you were in the neighbourhood and a mob was making its way to the campus?
 
I don't get your point .....

you said:

"If progressives are so amused by this "task"how would they feel if they were told to jump on MLK's head? maybe Muhammad's (if you were allowed to draw "him" in the first place?) JFK, LBJ, Carter, Clinton, Che Guevara, Obama, Mao, Lenin., Stalin, Castro, Nancy Pelosi?"


....I was responding to that.
I could certainly stomp on a piece of paper with any of those names on, none of them have any particular significance to me .... but to jump on someone's (anyone's)head?

that is completely different.

don't you understand that?

The difference is in my implied implied situation I wouldn't be telling anyone to stop on anyones heads UNDER DURESS...
 
I class you as the same as those muslims who get all fired up about cartoons.

I say that, because you seem to be as willing to check facts as they tend to be.... your indignation is over what you imagine to be the case.

I wonder what you would do if you were in the neighbourhood and a mob was making its way to the campus?

You can put me in any category you like - I just know the difference between force and willingness over something such as a grade.
 
Just to give the supporters of what this crazy fool professor did - It violates "Separation of Church and State (which doesn't even exist)" ohhhh and I could go further than that with the constitution -"Equal Protection Clause??"

The same "constitutional liberties" that homosexuals use to apply their arguments can be used here.
 
The difference is in my implied implied situation I wouldn't be telling anyone to stop on anyones heads UNDER DURESS...

so maybe you should do your homework first.

there is no evidence ANYONE was forced to stomp on the piece of paper under duress
 
You can put me in any category you like - I just know the difference between force and willingness over something such as a grade.

maybe you do .... but you have demonstrated that you like to go off on a rant over what you imagine to be the case ....
 
so maybe you should do your homework first.

there is no evidence ANYONE was forced to stomp on the piece of paper under duress

Well the young man in question that refused to stomp on Jesus was kicked out of the class so I would call that "duress."
 
maybe you do .... but you have demonstrated that you like to go off on a rant over what you imagine to be the case ....

I'm not going off on a rant - you're the one ranting about how I'm some sort of evangelical....

You said this is a First Amendment issue and I call BS because I know the Constitution - it is really that simple.
 
Back
Top Bottom