- Joined
- Oct 12, 2005
- Messages
- 281,619
- Reaction score
- 100,389
- Location
- Ohio
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian - Right
You had no point, only a diversion. You're trying to walk back your comment. No party wants dependence. And the only way one can argue it is to link it to winning and losing. You're being dishonest not only in your false argument, but in pretending it isn't an excuse.
rejected as being dishonest and contrary to known reality
another post where you engage in passive-aggressive attacks on your dreamed up motivations of another poster because you cannot actually refute the point made.
the fact is your party wants more and more and more people dependent on government hand outs
one party tries to win elections partially by telling those who make money that they can keep what they make
the other party tries to win by partially promising those who feel they should be given more the money of others