• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Palin Calls Obama a Liar in Speech to Conservative Activists......

right. And i'm sure as you think as jeb bush says, "history will be kind to gw bush." too right?

Funny thing about those who bitch about carter, they tend to not have a clue as to why they think he was a bad president beyond being told not to like him.

for us who lived back during those dark times, right after the fall of saigon, a few things stick out about carter.

He couldn't even control his own democrats in congress who allowed our military to become a hollow force.

Bullcrap republican talking point every single time a Dem is president.

apacherat said:
Something to do with the olympic to show the ruskies that he was upset. That's right, boycott the olympics because the soviet union invaded afghanistan. What a strategic move that was.

And this was a terrible thing why?

apacherat said:
Allowing the shaw of iran to be overthrown which was to be the birth of radical islam and would lead to the birth of al qaeda.

So when the Shah left Iran for cancer treatment, we should've gone to war with Iran?

apacherat said:
Associated with the later, the iranian hostage crisis where 52 americans were taken hostage in tehran and unfortunately carter couldn't get their release.

Blaming Carter for that? OMG... The Reagan Iran contra/hostage deal strike any kind of chord in your memory? Probably not.

apacherat said:
But what carter is best remembered for which the vast majority of all americans opposed, carter gave away our panama canal. We built it, we owned it and we protected it and we operated. It was our canal ! And carter gave it away. That's why he was the worst president until barack obama came around.

Giving back land that belongs to the country it resides in makes him a terrible president in your opinion. :facepalm:

apacherat said:
Guess what ? I didn't have to google anything, i was around back then and since i didn't fry my brains on drugs like most on the left did back in the 60's and 70's i still remember.

Conclude with a really stupid whiney generalization that all liberals where hippies. Every sentence you continue with only makes your post that much more irrelevant garbage.
 
Bush isn't president anymore - he was and ever will ever again legislate.

Focus on the present ****-bowl of soup.... Oh yeah you cant.

Yeah Nick... you'll be credible when I see you slam them for bringing up Carter in the first place. Nah... you won't be credible then either thanks to your post history. :lol:
 
Obama said:
Guantanamo bay to be closed within a year
Obama said:
No Earmarks in the $787 Billion Stimulus
Obama said:
Cut Deficit in Half by end of first term
Obama said:
We have run out of places in the US to drill for oil.
Obama said:
The health care bill will not increase the deficit by one dime.
Obama said:
I’ve done more for Israel’s security than any President ever
Obama said:
My Wife Didn’t Mean What She Said About Pride In Country
Obama said:
My father served in World War II.
Obama said:
I’ll get rid of earmarks
Obama said:
I would have the most transparent administration in History

The guy is far worse than a pathological liar.
 
Yeah Nick... you'll be credible when I see you slam them for bringing up Carter in the first place. Nah... you won't be credible then either thanks to your post history. :lol:

Really? because I will slam any and all presidents.

Some do better than others, but they're all tyrants - at least from Woodrow Wilson on forward.
 
Good evening, Apacherat.

What was given as the reason for giving away the Panama Canal?

You know how President Obama bows to Kings and Queens ?

Carter did the same by appeasing to a Latin American dictator, Gen. Torrijos.

Basically the Panamanians believed they owned the canal. Legally under international law, the canal was legally with in a territorial possession of the United States aka "U.S. Canal Zone." It's a military strategic position for quick access from the Atlantic to the Pacific, vice versa. Today a Communist Chinese company which is just a front for the Communist Chinese Peoples Liberation Army (PLA) operate the Panama Canal.

Do you have any utility easements running through your property like electric, phone, cable lines or gas lines ? Try telling those utilities that you actually own those utility lines, they'll laugh at you.

The Panama Canal was paid and built by the American tax payers. It was sovereign U.S. territory.
 
NO, I have already said that I wouldn't vote for Jeb Bush.

Why?

I have 2 brothers and one sister and I can tell you we all are different when it comes to politics and personality...
 
Conclude with a really stupid whiney generalization that all liberals where hippies. Every sentence you continue with only makes your post that much more irrelevant garbage.

Who brought up hippies ? But I'm willing to bet that 99 % of the yippies are your old liberals of today.

No, it's not a typo, yippies, the same individuals who helped put one of their own in the White House in 2012 and are still embarrassed of the failure they have in the White House today.
 
Really? because I will slam any and all presidents.

Some do better than others, but they're all tyrants - at least from Woodrow Wilson on forward.

What the hell? I said slam THEM for bringing up an even further past president as you did me for retorting with Bush.

Where is the reading comprehension?
 
Screw Karl Rove. He proved he no longer knows what the hell he's talking about in the last election.

Yeah, he was wrong and for just listening to polls. But you cannot escape the fact that he did bring in the Money for the GOP and at least gave Obama a run for the money. The Neo Con is the Money man. There is no getting round that. ;)
 
Says the person that promised to serve her state, and then quit! :cool:

Well.....but at least she isn't like the Democrats wherein she lives Very Very Well off other people's money.
 
If Obama were sliding into the land of obsure nothingness, you guys wouldn't be bitching about him as much as you guys do.

"Oh".....what has changed, while kickin the Lame Duck further down the road? :roll:
 
"Oh".....what has changed, while kickin the Lame Duck further down the road? :roll:

Are you complaining that he hasn't done anything? That'd be rich after years of hearing how he is actively destroying everything with Obamacare and all the Marxist, Lenninists, Maoist, Socialist, Facists policies that he has been "ramming down our throats."
 
Are you complaining that he hasn't done anything? That'd be rich after years of hearing how he is actively destroying everything with Obamacare and all the Marxist, Lenninists, Maoist, Socialist, Facists policies that he has been "ramming down our throats."

How does sliding into Obscurity have something to with what one has done? Even the Rich and famous can slide into Obscurity. Even a Record Holder can slide off into obscurity. Even a Star or a Celebrity can fall into Obscurity. Even a Poor man can slide off into obscurity. Are you now trying to say Obama isn't Human enough to be like all other humans? :roll:
 
her staff called bs?..that's something i haven't heard before now..

There were numerous frivolous ethics complaints against her. 150 FOIA requests which cost the state a million dollars. Her own defense costs against this trolling was more than 500K.
Those are the facts. You're just making stuff up. Par for the course.

"On July 28, a bipartisan panel of Alaska legislators voted unanimously to hire an independent investigator to probe Palin and her staff over Troopergate, events set in motion by Palin's July 11 firing of DPS (Department of Public Safety) Commissioner Walt Monegan.

Top Palin aide Frank Bailey figures large in the Troopergate scandal. Bailey was placed on paid administrative leave by Palin on August 19 after an audio recording surfaced of a call Bailey had made in February pressuring Alaska state troopers to fire Palin's ex-brother-in-law Mike Wooten. Yet although on leave, Palin's inbox shows another two e-mails from Frank Bailey (using the e-mail address "ftb907@hslak.com") were received on Sept. 5.

Michael Nizich is Palin's chief of staff, and has also been implicated in and subpoenaed over Troopergate. On August 7, he sent an e-mail to Palin's Yahoo account with the subject line, "FW: CONFIDENTIAL Ethics Matter." The following week, on August 13, Palin held a press conference disclosing that in addition to Bailey's phone call in February, members of her staff had made about two dozen contacts with public safety officials about her ex-brother-in-law.

Palin at Aug. 13 press conference

Randall Ruaro serves as deputy chief of staff for Palin. On August 19, the same day Palin announced that Frank Bailey would be placed on paid leave, Ruaro sent an e-mail to her private Yahoo account titled, "FW: DPS Personnel and Budget Issues." The following day, he followed up with another e-mail, "FW: DPS Employee Draft."

At the very least, these leaked inbox glimpses all show Sarah Palin was using "gov.palin@yahoo.com" to conduct state business, which she had not previously disclosed, despite an ongoing public records lawsuit to release all e-mails related to her official duties.

She had admitted using "gov.sarah@yahoo.com" for official business, so why not reveal this second Yahoo account? If not for this week's hacking incident, it would have remained unknown to the world. Why the secrecy? Why try so hard to cover up your e-mail trail? What exactly is Gov. Palin trying to hide?

The irony is that as numerous observers have noted, relying on Yahoo! e-mail accounts instead of a proprietary, secure system means Palin's accounts have not been deleted forever. E-mail providers like Yahoo keep backups, and the e-mails could be retrieved under court order if subpoenaed as part of an investigation.

Since the McCain campaign is expending maximum effort trying to shut down the bipartisan investigation into Troopergate, one can only conclude that where there's smoke, there was probably a smoking gun or two somewhere in Palin's Yahoo e-mails.

(For more on the back story behind the hacking and the public records lawsuit in Alaska, see an earlier HuffPo post - Sarah Palin E-Mails Deleted Under Cover of Hacking Incident.)"
Erik Ose: Sarah Palin's Inbox Reveals Possible Troopergate Smoking Guns



Btw, this was interesting given Palin's charges of lack of transparency - "While Ms. Palin took office promising a more open government, her administration has battled to keep information secret. Her inner circle discussed the benefit of using private e-mail addresses. An assistant told her it appeared that such e-mail messages sent to a private address on a “personal device” like a Blackberry “would be confidential and not subject to subpoena.”

The Cajun Boy: The New York Times exposes Sarah Palin's history of cronyism, blogger harassment
 
Bush II was GWB which I believe you DID vote for twice.

Yep, sure did....And although I can dislike certain things Bush did, and offer criticism of those things, I sure wasn't going to vote for either of the demo losers Gore, or Kerry...Long after Obama's lyin' arse is out you libs will still be lying about who's fault the results of his destructive policies are.
 
Well.....but at least she isn't like the Democrats wherein she lives Very Very Well off other people's money.


She lives off money other people send her. Does she have a "real" job?
 
Yep, sure did....And although I can dislike certain things Bush did, and offer criticism of those things, I sure wasn't going to vote for either of the demo losers Gore, or Kerry...Long after Obama's lyin' arse is out you libs will still be lying about who's fault the results of his destructive policies are.

LOL just proves how partisan you really are and how much the right doesn't really care about this country, they only care about winning an election so THEY can be the big spenders. As long as it is YOUR guy in office you and others on the right will vote for them REGARDLESS of their spending or increasing of the government. Pathetic and hypocritical of the right.
 
Does anyone still care what she thinks? She's yesterdays news.

Yeah, you wish. Did you ever consider the fact that the Tea Party started after her run for office? That wasn't an accident. How many people you know that inspire a whole movement? Not many.
 
"On July 28, a bipartisan panel of Alaska legislators voted unanimously to hire an independent investigator to probe Palin and her staff over Troopergate, events set in motion by Palin's July 11 firing of DPS (Department of Public Safety) Commissioner Walt Monegan.

Top Palin aide Frank Bailey figures large in the Troopergate scandal. Bailey was placed on paid administrative leave by Palin on August 19 after an audio recording surfaced of a call Bailey had made in February pressuring Alaska state troopers to fire Palin's ex-brother-in-law Mike Wooten. Yet although on leave, Palin's inbox shows another two e-mails from Frank Bailey (using the e-mail address "ftb907@hslak.com") were received on Sept. 5.

Michael Nizich is Palin's chief of staff, and has also been implicated in and subpoenaed over Troopergate. On August 7, he sent an e-mail to Palin's Yahoo account with the subject line, "FW: CONFIDENTIAL Ethics Matter." The following week, on August 13, Palin held a press conference disclosing that in addition to Bailey's phone call in February, members of her staff had made about two dozen contacts with public safety officials about her ex-brother-in-law.

Palin at Aug. 13 press conference

Randall Ruaro serves as deputy chief of staff for Palin. On August 19, the same day Palin announced that Frank Bailey would be placed on paid leave, Ruaro sent an e-mail to her private Yahoo account titled, "FW: DPS Personnel and Budget Issues." The following day, he followed up with another e-mail, "FW: DPS Employee Draft."

At the very least, these leaked inbox glimpses all show Sarah Palin was using "gov.palin@yahoo.com" to conduct state business, which she had not previously disclosed, despite an ongoing public records lawsuit to release all e-mails related to her official duties.

She had admitted using "gov.sarah@yahoo.com" for official business, so why not reveal this second Yahoo account? If not for this week's hacking incident, it would have remained unknown to the world. Why the secrecy? Why try so hard to cover up your e-mail trail? What exactly is Gov. Palin trying to hide?

The irony is that as numerous observers have noted, relying on Yahoo! e-mail accounts instead of a proprietary, secure system means Palin's accounts have not been deleted forever. E-mail providers like Yahoo keep backups, and the e-mails could be retrieved under court order if subpoenaed as part of an investigation.

Since the McCain campaign is expending maximum effort trying to shut down the bipartisan investigation into Troopergate, one can only conclude that where there's smoke, there was probably a smoking gun or two somewhere in Palin's Yahoo e-mails.

(For more on the back story behind the hacking and the public records lawsuit in Alaska, see an earlier HuffPo post - Sarah Palin E-Mails Deleted Under Cover of Hacking Incident.)"
Erik Ose: Sarah Palin's Inbox Reveals Possible Troopergate Smoking Guns



Btw, this was interesting given Palin's charges of lack of transparency - "While Ms. Palin took office promising a more open government, her administration has battled to keep information secret. Her inner circle discussed the benefit of using private e-mail addresses. An assistant told her it appeared that such e-mail messages sent to a private address on a “personal device” like a Blackberry “would be confidential and not subject to subpoena.”

The Cajun Boy: The New York Times exposes Sarah Palin's history of cronyism, blogger harassment

Your wishful thinking isn't going to change the fact that they never found anything.
 
Yeah, you wish. Did you ever consider the fact that the Tea Party started after her run for office? That wasn't an accident. How many people you know that inspire a whole movement? Not many.

You mean her FAILED run for office? Just like the tea party has failed to change things in congress? Yep, we know they have a high failure rate, so I guess Palin does represent them well :lamo
 
Back
Top Bottom