• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Palin Calls Obama a Liar in Speech to Conservative Activists......

joko104 said:
The point you are trying to make is really stupid.
Click to expand...

Please elaborate and establish the stupidity in his point by showing facts to refute it.
 
joko104 said:
The point you are trying to make is really stupid.
Click to expand...

Well, Sarah Palin is dumb to begin with, so I don't have much to work with.
 
tererun said:
No please do go on and tell us all about how great sarah is and keep putting more and more people off of your POV. Don't let me stop you from idolizing one of the biggest village idiots in the world.
Click to expand...

nah, i'd rather sit here and watch you spew idiocy out of your dark hole...

speaking of village idiots, how on earth did you come to the conclusion that i idolize her or think she is great?.. did I not make it clear when i said i am not a fan of her politics?


i'll bet a dollar to a donut Palin wouldn't have ****ed up my post as much as you just did:lol:
 
Hatuey said:
So, they didn't check up on him before he became president? No background checks? None?
Click to expand...

I'm sure they did - and really liked what they saw (and could use against him). Obama is a shill. For corporate American and for the neo-cons. Best one they ever had too - by far.
 
joko104 said:
I'm sure they did - and really liked what they saw (and could use against him). Obama is a shill. For corporate American and for the neo-cons. Best one they ever had too - by far.
Click to expand...

So Joko, you got any proof Obama didn't go through background checks before becoming POTUS? The best part about your post is that you probably think that Sarah Palin - who works for FOX, has deals with Viacom and sells herself out to anybody willing to pay for her appearance is somehow not a corporal shill.
 
66gardeners said:
The sheer beauty is that Palin is telling the republicans they are a bunch of losers, and they are lapping it up.
Click to expand...

They are not good at realizing you laugh at the buffoon, not idolize it. When Homer Simpson hands his toddler a pistol you are not supposed to make a political movement out of it. When you read the bible you should get a sense of how far humans have come since the days that was written, not try to remake your country in that image. When you are head of the country's federal science committee you should not think vaginas stop working because the woman doesn't want any sex. But if we can remove the stupid and marginalize it into a party for sarah, perhaps one with tea, that is a great way to improve the republican party, or to drive it's intelligent people to abandon it for something viable. That is why i like what sarah is doing. She is sort of like the pied piper of hamlin for idiots.
 
Hatuey said:
Great claims require great evidence. If the claim is that Obama did not go through a background check before running for President, one has to wonder why? If he did, then why is it they (the various NS organizations in the country) didn't find anything which raised red flags for national security? What? Are we just handing the codes to the sylos over to whomever runs for president?

As it stands we can only "presume" to know one thing: Obama went through necessary background checks performed on presidential hopefuls since the 50s-60s. They found nothing and moved on.
Click to expand...

I have no doubt he went through background checks.... and i have no doubt you are smart enough to know Palin was speaking about the vetting process and the crap we still don't know about him..... knowing her, there's probably also a lil birther thing goin' on there too.
 
joko104 said:
So you then approve of pure partisanship and it is entirely correct for Republicans to hope Obama fails.
Click to expand...

Close, but unlike sarah Obama is actually in a position to screw up the country when he does and therefor the lives of those rooting for him to fail, and doing everything in their power to see it happen and damning the consequences. It would be more like watching Al Sharpton fail and enjoying the show.
 
Thrilla said:
I have no doubt he went through background checks.... and i have no doubt you are smart enough to know Palin was speaking about the vetting process and the crap we still don't know about him..... knowing her, there's probably also a lil birther thing goin' on there too.
Click to expand...

Vetting process? I'm not a mind reader, I go with what she said:

"More background checks? Dandy idea, Mr. President. Should have started with yours," she said in a speech peppered with one-liners and folksy language."
Click to expand...

What vetting process? He ran for president. That was his vetting process. Nobody found anything that made him ineligible for being president. Now, as for BACKGROUND CHECKS, which is what Palin was actually speaking about, did Obama not go through any?
 
JC Callender said:
She did fine as governor and decided to resign on her own after her state, with their small population, was inundated with frivolous lawsuits from leftists. She left it in the capable hands of her Lt. Gov. Sean Parnell. Anyway, after that she roused the Conservative and Tea Party members to vote Republican in what became a blowout victory in the 2010 midterms.

She's still very significant today, mainly because Liberals can't stop talking about her, but also because she's helping to get people elected. People like Ted Cruz. Yep....remember that name.
Click to expand...

I'll take a crack at that...Sarah Palin...um...yeah, and now for the weather...
 
joko104 said:
Palin really does have great control over you! :lamo
Click to expand...

That was a terrible attempt at a deflection. No really, what did you expect me to do, run around screaming oh no a palin fan thinks she has control over me? Was that what you were hoping for? Like I tell the other palin fans, don't let me stop you from hoisting her up on your shoulders and using her as your party's icon. I am sure it will not benefit your opposition in any way.
 
Hatuey said:
What vetting process? He ran for president. That was his vetting process. Nobody found anything that made him ineligible for being president. Now, as for BACKGROUND CHECKS, which is what Palin was actually speaking about, did Obama not go through any?
Click to expand...

The simple answer is YES! Every presidential candidate has to undergo a background check before they become nominees. Each party's by-laws require it. But I'll give ole Sarah-Who? credit where due; her one-liner was a great jab for her Conservative base. But only the mindless or political pundits would give her rhetoric a :thumbs:. It's easy to poke fun at the man in the big chair, but when it was her turn to throw her name in the hat where was she?

You folks can continue to cheer for her if you wish, but all I hear when she speaks is nails on a chalk board. I pay attention only because you guys keep making her relevent. Case and point: She didn't even win the CPAC straw poll, yet you folks prop her up as if she was the front-runner for the 2016 presidency. Do yourselves a favor and forget this has-been regardless of whether she wears lipstick or Tiffany cuff-links. She's only good for self-grandizing, nothing more.
 
Last edited:
Thrilla said:
nah, i'd rather sit here and watch you spew idiocy out of your dark hole...
Click to expand...

Actually, I don't type with my butt, I type with my fingers. You don't have to help me to illustrate the problems that come about when you stop thinking about what you are saying.
Thrilla said:
speaking of village idiots, how on earth did you come to the conclusion that i idolize her or think she is great?.. did I not make it clear when i said i am not a fan of her politics?
Click to expand...

Only one of her fans would defend her so much. Everyone else is in on the joke.

Thrilla said:
i'll bet a dollar to a donut Palin wouldn't have ****ed up my post as much as you just did:lol:
Click to expand...

Yeah, that is because she wouldn't spit on you if you were on fire. She had a stage at CPAC to make a fool out of herself on, I am pretty sure she doesn't have to come here to make a fool out of herself for one of her fans. But give it a couple of years, she might get that desperate.
 
Hatuey said:
Vetting process? I'm not a mind reader, I go with what she said:



What vetting process? He ran for president. That was his vetting process. Nobody found anything that made him ineligible for being president. Now, as for BACKGROUND CHECKS, which is what Palin was actually speaking about, did Obama not go through any?
Click to expand...

well, I didn't take the quip anywhere near as literally as you did.... so meh, whatever... have fun with it.

i've already answered the question of background checks, no need to answer an answered question .
 
tererun said:
Actually, I don't type with my butt, I type with my fingers. You don't have to help me to illustrate the problems that come about when you stop thinking about what you are saying.
Click to expand...
I noticed you forgot to mention your brain... you should probably engage that next time, it'll help with comprehension.


Only one of her fans would defend her so much. Everyone else is in on the joke.
Click to expand...

there's a big ass world between love and hate... I'm somewhere in that big ass world, neither hating her nor loving her... so yeah, I reject your false dichotomy.



Yeah, that is because she wouldn't spit on you if you were on fire. She had a stage at CPAC to make a fool out of herself on, I am pretty sure she doesn't have to come here to make a fool out of herself for one of her fans. But give it a couple of years, she might get that desperate.
Click to expand...

what...the.. hell...?
you really do have a comprehension problem... ****, now I feel bad for making fun of you.
 
Thrilla said:
I noticed you forgot to mention your brain... you should probably engage that next time, it'll help with comprehension.




there's a big ass world between love and hate... I'm somewhere in that big ass world, neither hating her nor loving her... so yeah, I reject your false dichotomy.





what...the.. hell...?
you really do have a comprehension problem... ****, now I feel bad for making fun of you.
Click to expand...

I am sorry, of course your hero sarah would spit on you if you were on fire. She probably reads all your fanmail also, and I am sure she really cares you are out there. What I do find funny is that even her fans find it a tad repulsive to even admit they are fans. It shows me they have an underlying fundamental understanding of how the rest of the world views palin fans, and they probably know it is well deserved. Please do not let me get in the way of your fandom.
 
tererun said:
I am sorry, of course your hero sarah would spit on you if you were on fire. She probably reads all your fanmail also, and I am sure she really cares you are out there. What I do find funny is that even her fans find it a tad repulsive to even admit they are fans. It shows me they have an underlying fundamental understanding of how the rest of the world views palin fans, and they probably know it is well deserved. Please do not let me get in the way of your fandom.
Click to expand...

unoriginal trolling is unoriginal.
 
MMC said:
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Sarah Palin, the 2008 Republican vice presidential nominee, called President Barack Obama a liar and urged her party to stand by conservative values, rousing the crowd at a conservative conference on Saturday.
"Barack Obama promised the most transparent administration ever. Barack Obama, you lie," the former Alaska governor said in an address to the Conservative Political Action Conference near Washington.

2013-03-17T040635Z_1_CBRE92F1PJ800_RTROPTP_2_USA-REPUBLICANS-CPAC.JPG


"More background checks? Dandy idea, Mr. President. Should have started with yours," she said in a speech peppered with one-liners and folksy language.

"We're not here to put a fresh coat of rhetorical paint on our party. We're not here to abandon our principles in a contest of government giveaways. That's a game we will never, ever win. We're here to restore America," she said.....snip~

Palin calls Obama a liar in speech to conservative activists - Yahoo! News

Get Him Sarah.....and don't forget those Gee-golly-wilikers. Seems Sarah has that look in her eye again. One thing is for sure, it's all about that Sarah Smile!
Click to expand...

Palin is sometimes fun to listen to and I am sure she give a boost of energy to the Republicans and disgust to the Democrats. But I would say I do not think most independents take her serious anymore. She had her time in the sun.
 
Utility Man said:
Have to wonder why that party keeps rewarding their failures.


Palin 2016, yee haw!
Click to expand...

There is no larger failure than the current Commander in Chief.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom