• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Washington Times Creating Conservative TV Channel

Until I see quality conservative programming, I'll stick to PBS and C-SPAN for conservative analysis.
 
The fact that a well known NASA supporter like Neil Armstrong wrote a book about going to the moon is in itself evidence that it we did not go

That's how ridiculous your statement sounds.
 
That's how ridiculous your statement sounds.

Yeah, there is nothing odd about a book written by a liberal who has worked for MSNBC and Mother Jones writing a book denying a liberal bias in the mainstream media.

And OJ's "If I Did It" was purely hypothetical...
 
Yeah, there is nothing odd about a book written by a pilot who has worked for NASA and the government writing a book stating we went to the moon.

That's how ridiculous your statement sounds. If a person's own political lean is enough to discredit their claims, opinions etc, you may as well click that little red X at the corner of your windows when you are speaking about Liberals.
 
Good, then maybe conservatives will finally realise there's only a liberal bias in the media because they're not doing anything to counter it.
 
If Mahmoud Ahmadinejad wrote a book claiming the holocaust never took place, the evidence to the contrary and his personal history should not be a factor in considering it's validity.

That's how ridiculous your statement sounds.
 
That's how ridiculous your statement sounds.
If it was as obvious as the nose on your face that NASA never sent astronauts to the moon then your comparison might be worthy of consideration_
 
If it was as obvious as the nose on your face that NASA never sent astronauts to the moon then your comparison might be worthy of consideration_

It's obvious to some bat**** people that we never went to the moon. Just as it's obvious to bat**** insane people that the media is a big Jewish conspiracy. :shrug:
 
I wonder, if the Koch Bros. buy the Tribunes, if their papers will still be a part of the liberal media. As all of the media is gradually purchased by the billionairs you will not have to worry about any liberal media bias anymore. Rest assured that the only message anyone will hear is the one they want you to hear. If there ever was a true liberal bias to the media, it is on its way out.
 
It's obvious to some bat**** people that we never went to the moon. Just as it's obvious to bat**** insane people that the media is a big Jewish conspiracy. :shrug:
You do realize the stormfront nazis who promote this "Jewish conspiracy" are an extremely small minority, right?

I thought our discussion was simply about the obvious widespread left-wing media bias_

So please don't go getting all wacko on me dude__Let's keep it down to earth, okay?!
 
I wonder, if the Koch Bros. buy the Tribunes, if their papers will still be a part of the liberal media.
The Koch Bros are devout right wingers so political lean is almost a given_


As all of the media is gradually purchased by the billionairs you will not have to worry about any liberal media bias anymore. Rest assured that the only message anyone will hear is the one they want you to hear. If there ever was a true liberal bias to the media, it is on its way out.
If you believe Billionaires are all rightwingers you are BIGTIME mistaken_

I'm not going to bother with a list so you'll just have to google it yourself_
 
The Koch Bros are devout right wingers so political lean is almost a given_


If you believe Billionaires are all rightwingers you are BIGTIME mistaken_

I'm not going to bother with a list so you'll just have to google it yourself_

I grant you that not all wealthy are rightwingers. Just like not all of any group is able to be labeled as either political orientation. But generalities are often true, this one being such a case.
 
You do realize the stormfront nazis who promote this "Jewish conspiracy" are an extremely small minority, right?

I have to wonder why you've strayed so far away from the flock if that is the case.

I thought our discussion was simply about the obvious widespread left-wing media bias_
So please don't go getting all wacko on me dude__Let's keep it down to earth, okay?!

As we all know, "Mainstream Liberal Media" is just codeword for "Jewish Run Media". That a self described far right member like yourself would deny that is just more evidence that it is.
 
Until I see quality conservative programming, I'll stick to PBS and C-SPAN for conservative analysis.

Conservative analysis on PBS and C-Span? Dude, I literally had to clear coffee off my monitor thanks to this comment. Apparently you're unfamiliar with true conservatism, and are content with fleeting lip-service to it.
 
Conservative analysis on PBS and C-Span? Dude, I literally had to clear coffee off my monitor thanks to this comment. Apparently you're unfamiliar with true conservatism, and are content with fleeting lip-service to it.

I'm pretty familiar with it, but it is quite clear you are way out of your league when it comes to dissemination of conservative ideas. You must be more familiar with the pedestrian Fox News, made for children who like enticing special effects, yelling, and babes on the screen. It's more hilarious American conservatives think great conservative ideas are distributed by models and angry men yelling at each other. On C-SPAN you get conservative think-tanks galore, dating back to the mid-1980s. For decades on PBS they had distributed William Buckley's Firing Line, Ben Wattenberg's Think-Tank, Hoover Institute's Uncommon Knowledge and now Jim Glassman's Ideas in Action.

C-SPAN Video Library

About Page - Ideas in Action

Uncommon Knowledge | Hoover Institution
 
Last edited:
I grant you that not all wealthy are rightwingers. Just like not all of any group is able to be labeled as either political orientation. But generalities are often true, this one being such a case.
Do you have any evidence?
 
I'm pretty familiar with it, but it is quite clear you are way out of your league when it comes to dissemination of conservative ideas. You must be more familiar with the pedestrian Fox News, made for children who like enticing special effects, yelling, and babes on the screen. It's more hilarious American conservatives think great conservative ideas are distributed by models and angry men yelling at each other. On C-SPAN you get conservative think-tanks galore, dating back to the mid-1980s. For decades on PBS they had distributed William Buckley's Firing Line, Ben Wattenberg's Think-Tank, Hoover Institute's Uncommon Knowledge and now Jim Glassman's Ideas in Action.

C-SPAN Video Library

About Page - Ideas in Action

Uncommon Knowledge | Hoover Institution

Three hours a week gives them credibility?
 
Conservative analysis on PBS and C-Span? Dude, I literally had to clear coffee off my monitor thanks to this comment. Apparently you're unfamiliar with true conservatism, and are content with fleeting lip-service to it.

Literally?
 
Three hours a week gives them credibility?

One half hour a week would be better than 12 hours of silly nonsense a day.
 
The Washington Times extending reach with cable network - Washington Times

Another Fox News???? Yes. I can hear the liberals whining already!! We can finally have some type of balance on cable now! It won't be long now until the liberals come on this page and bash it for being un-fair for infringing on their monopoly rights :) Read it and weep!

I love it.... I'm not a TV guy but I do like (and get annoyed) by The Blaze TV.....

Libertarians need their own channel.... I should really look into that...

Nancy Pelosi would be my first "guest" - that would be fun!

I suppose my problem is no one knows who I am.

Me, Michael Savage and Wilkow vs Pelosi - give her the MSNBC treatment :)
 
You people on the left are clueless as to how things work here in the real world__Apparently you have confused Corporate profit with Capitalist politics_

ie, even though Corporations and Capitalism are dependent on each other and share the same economic/political roots, they have different responsibilities_

It is the function of Capitalism to maintain a friendly political environment to allow Corporations to operate efficiently and free to concentrate on profit_

And shouldn't said corporations then support a "business-friendly" narrative rather than your perception of a "liberal" one?
 
You do realize the stormfront nazis who promote this "Jewish conspiracy" are an extremely small minority, right?

I thought our discussion was simply about the obvious widespread left-wing media bias_

So please don't go getting all wacko on me dude__Let's keep it down to earth, okay?!

A conspiracy theory like "massive liberal media bias" has more followers but that doesn't make it more accurate.

The media has a financial bias, a sensational bias (which is related to the financial bias), and a bias towards laziness.
 
Monopoly rights?

Oh, I see, you still buy into that "liberal media" myth. That billion-dollar corporations would promote a daily liberal narrative.

What makes you think that big gov't corporations do not support big gov't (and vice versa)? Corporations would much prefer borrow and spend to tax and spend, because they are the ones most targetted by tax increases. While gov't "over regulation" is often cited as bad for business, it is far worse for small businesses than for big businesses. Large corporations, like GE/Apple, rig the rules via gov't "help" to ensure that their taxes are low and they can use "global" resources without any adverse impacts. While liberals paint "big oil" as the boogie man, they pay far more taxes, and create/support far more US jobs, than "big tech" or "big green". Where would "big auto" and abundent energy be without "big oil"?
 
Back
Top Bottom