• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

AP PHOTOS: Mob in Pakistan torches Christian homes

Dr. Chuckles said:
http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...orches-christian-homes-32.html#post1061556692
Click to expand...

thank you for continuing to post links that support me :shrug: LMAO

i dont know why you think you can make our posts mean something that was never said based on your opinion? LMAO

are posts are there in black and white and you make up in your head that they mean something else when they factually dont, you are the only one in this thread saying "nu0huh" LMAO

we posted something and you say "nu-huh" that REALLY means this, when it doesnt LOL

keep trying though this is hilarious and ill repeat it again

my original point stands, condemning a group on some is illogical, dishonest and or bigoted, this is the point that we have made over and over and it has never changed :D
 
RabidAlpaca said:
Now, now, you know that doesn't count. This is a muslim bashing session, don't try to drag christians into this.
Click to expand...

Just so I have the rules straight... all actions carried out by the US government are now done in the name of Christianity? This is what you're trying to claim, right?
 
Grant said:
More gobbledygook.
Click to expand...

translation: you have nothing

is there something wrong with what i said, ill post it again you tell me what wrong with it "if i wanted to talk about the article i would have simply posted a link to the article, posted i think its a shame and asked people what they think."

weird this bothers you lol
 
Dr. Chuckles said:
The first link addresses you claiming that your argument never changed by documenting how your argument actually changed

first link http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...orches-christian-homes-33.html#post1061557000

you wrote

I responded by pointing out this was false and linked to a series of posts showing that your argument did indeed change

see

http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...orches-christian-homes-29.html#post1061554115

I know "nu-uh"
Click to expand...

its only false in your head and no where else all my posts here support the fact my argument never changed :shrug:
 
Objective-J said:
I could make a post that says something similarly as stupid as your post like all black people are criminals, if it lasted 1000 pages that doesnt make it a success LMAO
Click to expand...

except nio such claim was made in the OP

posted previously

Dr. Chuckles said:
8

1) his comment concerned Islam " being the religion of peace". Unless you are claiming Islam *is* the religion of peace, I am unsure what you are taking issue with

2) as stated previous, and which you failed to address. Even if Islam was an inherently violent religion, such does not amount to every Muslim being violent. The religion is still interpreted
Click to expand...


your response


Objective-J said:
thank you for your opinion of the recap, however your opinion of it and what was actually said is meaningless to me :

he factually grouped them together whether you agree or not :shrug:
Click to expand...



Again, not your failure to actually address anything and you simply resorting to the usual "nu-uh"
 
Objective-J said:
its only false in your head and no where else all my posts here support the fact my argument never changed :shrug:
Click to expand...

Another "nu-uh" Not the most convincing route, but maybe if you pepper it with more declarations about winning it will work better.
 
Dr. Chuckles said:
1.)except nio such claim was made in the OP

posted previously




your response






Again, not your failure to actually address anything and you simply resorting to the usual "nu-uh"
Click to expand...

1.) one equally as illogical was factually made
2.) yes i read your OPINION on thos, it doesnt change anything that actually happened
3.) sure "i" do LMAO

remind me again who is telling other posters what they ACTUALLY said? LMAO "nu-huh" in deed
 
Dr. Chuckles said:
Another "nu-uh" Not the most convincing route, but maybe if you pepper it with more declarations about winning it will work better.
Click to expand...

thats what i thought, you got nothing :)

ill wait for you to address what we actually posted instead of the argument in your head :D
 
Objective-J said:
is there something wrong with what i said, ill post it again you tell me what wrong with it "if i wanted to talk about the article i would have simply posted a link to the article, posted i think its a shame and asked people what they think."
Click to expand...

I've told you many times, and you seem capable of doing little more than going "nu-uh" in response ...



I'm not sure he's bothered, more jus pointing
 
Dr. Chuckles said:
I've told you many times, and you seem capable of doing little more than going "nu-uh" in response ...



I'm not sure he's bothered, more jus pointing
Click to expand...

im aware of what YOU say, lmao its meaningless to honest posters here :shrug:

its just another lie, he asked a question i directly answered because it had to do with i was actually discussing :)
 
Objective-J said:
1.) one equally as illogical was factually made
Click to expand...

you simply declaring something doesn't establish fact. My arguments have been presented and you are free to address them if you feel they are wrong. But at this point, you are seemingly incapable of doing so


Objective-J said:
remind me again who is telling other posters what they ACTUALLY said? LMAO "nu-huh" in deed
Click to expand...

I'm not telling you what you said, I am quoting you and pointing out the clear meaning of your words. Your response to this is to go "nu-uh"

So yes, LMAO, indeed
 
Dr. Chuckles said:
1.)you simply declaring something doesn't establish fact. My arguments have been presented and you are free to address them if you feel they are wrong. But at this point, you are seemingly incapable of doing so




2.)I'm not telling you what you said, I am quoting you and pointing out the clear meaning of your words. Your response to this is to go "nu-uh"

So yes, LMAO, indeed
Click to expand...

1.) i know, thats why im glad i didnt "declare" it, i just read the op and the point i have made over and over again that you cant change no matter how many times you try :D
2.) weird, the qoutes dont support anything you say but you act like they do LMAO

they support me every time :shrug:

does this tatic of lying and making stuff up actually work on anybody?
 
Risky Thicket said:
How about Christians blowing up Muslim houses with drones?
Click to expand...
How do you know the people operating the drones were Christians? Or are you claiming that the actions and policies of a supposedly secular United States Government are fundamentally Christian?
 
Jack Fabulous said:
How do you know the people operating the drones were Christians? Or are you claiming that the actions and policies of a supposedly secular United States Government are fundamentally Christian?
Click to expand...

Look, I was kidding, Jack. Drone pilots never were and to this day are not Christians. I can't tell you how I know, but I do know for a fact, without a doubt, that drone pilots have been and continue to be Rastafarians. Yea, mon. Prove me wrong. Ire, ire.
 
Risky Thicket said:
Look, I was kidding, Jack. Drone pilots never were and to this day are not Christians. I can't tell you how I know, but I do know for a fact, without a doubt, that drone pilots have been and continue to be Rastafarians. Yea, mon. Prove me wrong. Ire, ire.
Click to expand...
Maybe you were, maybe you weren't. It doesn't really matter.

Muslim terrorists and Muslim nations do what they do in the name of their religion. Lots of apologists like to take the actions of the US Government and try to label them as acts of "Christians". It's about the most intellectually dishonest cop out there is but Christians are an easy target, I guess.
 
Objective-J said:
1.) i know, thats why im glad i didnt "declare" it, i just read the op and the point i have made over and over again that you cant change no matter how many times you try :D
2.) weird, the qoutes dont support anything you say but you act like they do LMAO

they support me every time :shrug:

does this tatic of lying and making stuff up actually work on anybody?
Click to expand...

By the way, just some friendly advice here........but using a bunch of emoticons in every post and ending or beginning every other line with "LMAO" doesn't do much to strengthen your position, nor does it encourage anyone to take your rants any more seriously........but feel free to carry on......you seem to have thoroughly convinced yourself that you did not say what you actually did in this thread.

Not that it matters all that much to you................ you're winning..... as long as you're residing in your little "happy place."
 
FluffyNinja said:
By the way, just some friendly advice here........but using a bunch of emoticons in every post and ending or beginning every other line with "LMAO" doesn't do much to strengthen your position, nor does it encourage anyone to take your rants any more seriously........but feel free to carry on......you seem to have thoroughly convinced yourself that you did not say what you actually did in this thread.

Not that it matters all that much to you................ you're winning..... as long as you're residing in your little "happy place."
Click to expand...

another attempt to deflect huh?
my positions doesnt need "strengthened" LMAO
convincing dishonest posters is not a concern of mine, your OP is still here so are all my posts, nothing else is needed and me and the point other posters made still stand :shrug:



this has nothing to do with "winning", your OP failed, posters pointed that out and now some people are spinning to try and convince others it didnt happen. Im fine with this. :D

let me know when this changes LOL maybe you can come up with something when you are done running an hiding and fearing all muslims!!! :scared:
 
A lot of effort is being put into derailing this thread.

Is it deliberate??
 
Jack Fabulous said:
Just so I have the rules straight... all actions carried out by the US government are now done in the name of Christianity? This is what you're trying to claim, right?
Click to expand...
ObamaPope?
 
Jerry said:
So it's really just more Muslim on Muslim crime.
Click to expand...

That's an ongoing international problem, for sure. Even the strongest military force in the world couldn't prevent Muslims from murdering their fellow Muslims.
 
Jerry said:
So it's really just more Muslim on Muslim crime.
Click to expand...

christianity is so neferious, they use proxy muslims for their jihad
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom