• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

AP PHOTOS: Mob in Pakistan torches Christian homes

All I did in the OP was link to a news story about a mob of Muslims burning down Christian homes for insulting the prophet (I obviously did not write the news story)........... then I pointed out the irony by jokingly commenting on how Islam considers itself to be the "Religion of Peace".

So, you believe that my OP is illogical, biased, and bigoted.......so I ask you again.......if you disagree with my comments then you must agree then that Islam IS indeed the "Religion of Peace" right? Are you afraid to answer now?

BTW, you continue with the ad hominem attacks..........you know this is the first and most obvious sign that you have lost an argument.......not that I needed to point out your childish tactics to prove that everything you've posted is seriously lacking in substance. :shrug:

Why do you respond to the troll when he keeps repeating the same foolishness? I like politeness as much as anyone, FN, but you're taking it a step too far.
 
Why do you respond to the troll when he keeps repeating the same foolishness? I like politeness as much as anyone, FN, but you're taking it a step too far.

still upset cause you coudlnt dispute my posts i see LOL

will you like to try now?

if you disagree with anything i said all you have to do is factually support it :Shrug:
 
no thats not what i "must agree too"

what you di in the op is judge a group based on some thats why posted exposed it

What I did was claim, using sarcasm, that Islam is not the "Religion of Peace" which it portrays and linked one news story as evidenc to the irony of that claim. What I could do If I really wanted to, is post hundreds of such stories of violence perpetrated by Muslims, in the name of their religion, against non-Muslims which have occurred in the past year alone.

Okay, so we now know, because of your refusal or inability to produce any evidence to the contrary, that you do indeed believe that Islam is the "Religion of Peace".......and you call me ignorant and uneducated.
 
What I did was claim, using sarcasm, that Islam is not the "Religion of Peace" which it portrays and linked one news story as evidenc to the irony of that claim. What I could do If I really wanted to, is post hundreds of such stories of violence perpetrated by Muslims, in the name of their religion, against non-Muslims which have occurred in the past year alone.

Okay, so we now know, because of your refusal or inability to produce any evidence to the contrary, that you do indeed believe that Islam is the "Religion of Peace".......and you call me ignorant and uneducated.

EXACTLY!!!!!!

LMAO

you judged a group based on the actions of some

that was exactly our point we made and why your posts is uneducated, illogical and or bigoted :shrug:

anything else you want to make up or use to deflect feel free, we dont buy it lol and it doesnt change what you did.

thank you! lol
 
Why do you respond to the troll when he keeps repeating the same foolishness? I like politeness as much as anyone, FN, but you're taking it a step too far.

Yes, you are correct of course. This guy sounds like a paid spokesperson for CAIR. I should know better than to indulge someone with such a blatant and insufferable tendency to deny reality. I think I'll take your advice and simply leave him in his current state of ignorant bliss......where in his world, Islam, as both a political and religious institution, has proven itself to be very peace-loving and non-violent. :lol:
 
EXACTLY!!!!!!

LMAO

you judged a group based on the actions of some

that was exactly our point we made and why your posts is uneducated, illogical and or bigoted :shrug:

anything else you want to make up or use to deflect feel free, we dont buy it lol and it doesnt change what you did.

thank you! lol

Good, so you agree that Islam is inherently a peace-loving and non-violent institution as evidenced by all of the hundreds of positive incidents its adherents have participated in during the last 10 years or so which have been reported in the news. Great, now we see where you stand. Thanks for that! :thumbs:
 
Good, so you agree that Islam is inherently a peace-loving and non-violent institution as evidenced by all of the hundreds of positive incidents its adherents have participated in during the last 10 years or so which have been reported in the news. Great, now we see where you stand. Thanks for that! :thumbs:

Great, you added "which have been reported in the news" because if you said "Good, so you agree that Islam is inherently a peace-loving and non-violent institution as evidenced by all of the hundreds of positive incidents its adherents have participated in during the last 10 years or so" it wouldn't have been sarcasm. Great, now we see where you stand. Thanks for that! :thumbs: _________________________________________________________________________________ ....... p.s. thanks as well for the delicious Irony of inadvertently adding "Absence of Evidence is Not Evidence of Absence~ Carl Sagan" to that :thumbs:
 
Last edited:
Good, so you agree that Islam is inherently a peace-loving and non-violent institution as evidenced by all of the hundreds of positive incidents its adherents have participated in during the last 10 years or so which have been reported in the news. Great, now we see where you stand. Thanks for that! :thumbs:

no where did i say that but feel free to continue to lie and in a failed attempt to save face but it wont work since your OP is still here and people already exposed it :shrug: LOL im fine with that fact so you are welcome :D
 
Last edited:
Certainly there may be a Jew or two flying American drones.
So your counter argument to a situation in which Muslims specifically target Christians for no reason other than they being Christian is that Obama is using drones to kill Muslims for no other reason than they are Muslims? Radical!!!
 
So your counter argument to a situation in which Muslims specifically target Christians for no reason other than they being Christian is that Obama is using drones to kill Muslims for no other reason than they are Muslims? Radical!!!

Naaa, that's probably not my counter argument.
 
Great, you added "which have been reported in the news" because if you said "Good, so you agree that Islam is inherently a peace-loving and non-violent institution as evidenced by all of the hundreds of positive incidents its adherents have participated in during the last 10 years or so" it wouldn't have been sarcasm. Great, now we see where you stand. Thanks for that! :thumbs: _________________________________________________________________________________ ....... p.s. thanks as well for the delicious Irony of inadvertently adding "Absence of Evidence is Not Evidence of Absence~ Carl Sagan" to that :thumbs:

Hey I don't control what the media puts out there..........even Al-Jazeera proudly displays frequent acts of Muslim-perpetrated violence on a routine basis. Trust me, as an institution, Islam doesn't need lil' ol' me to incriminate them......they do a pretty good job of incriminating themselves........ through their own media outlets and through their political actions at the national level. :lol:
 
Naaa, that's probably not my counter argument.
Either your counter argument was foolish (and just said because...how was it put....ewwwwww buuuuuuuurn) or you meant in which case your damn skippy that is your counter argument. Comparing drone strikes to this incident means you well and truly believe that Obama is sending drones to kill Muslims because they are Muslim.
 
EXACTLY!!!!!!

LMAO

you judged a group based on the actions of some

that was exactly our point we made and why your posts is uneducated, illogical and or bigoted :shrug:

anything else you want to make up or use to deflect feel free, we dont buy it lol and it doesnt change what you did.

thank you! lol

Actually no he didn't. Islam claims to be "the religion of peace" by it's own organization. The actions of some of it's practitioners and it's past and resent history have shown this to be false. All he did was point this out. He did not pass judgement or anything even close.

He judged the actions of some to cast doubt on what appears by all accounts to be a bogus claim.

Christianity cannot claim to be the religion of peace either because of it's history and the actions by some of it's practitioners as well. Maybe one of the far eastern religions can, but not any of the religions based on Judaism.

Next time please stick to the evidence before you.
 
Last edited:
no where did i say that but feel free to continue to lie and in a failed attempt to save face but it wont work since your OP is still here and people already exposed it :shrug: LOL im fine with that fact so you are welcome :D

Who are these "people" who have exposed me? You? And who else? RiskyThicket? After his "Christian drone attack" lie, he's backpeddled out of this thread so fast he left skid marks........and you've still got ........yep....nothing. :lol:

So, where are all of these "people"?.......Maybe in your happy place where 99.9% of Muslims are peace-loving and non-violent? You funny guy, you. :lol:
 
Actually no he didn't. Islam claims to be "the religion of peace" by it's own organization. The actions of some of it's practitioners and it's past and resent history have shown this to be false. All he did was point this out. He did not pass judgement or anything even close.

He judged the actions of some to cast doubt on what appears by all accounts to be a bogus claim.

Christianity cannot claim to be the religion of peace either because of it's history and the actions by some of it's practitioners as well. Maybe one of the far eastern religions can, but not any of the religions based on Judaism.

Next time please stick to the evidence before you.

facts and the first post disagree with you

hell even his owns words prove you wrong in post 478, sorry what he did as already been pointed out by other posters

the evidence before me is his own words, his own post and obviously people agree and pointed it out

he judged muslims/islam by the actions of a few, he let the actions of a few cast doubt on the group, sorry these facts and evidence are here in black and white LOL
 
Who are these "people" who have exposed me? You? And who else? RiskyThicket? After his "Christian drone attack" lie, he's backpeddled out of this thread so fast he left skid marks........and you've still got ........yep....nothing. :lol:

So, where are all of these "people"?.......Maybe in your happy place where 99.9% of Muslims are peace-loving and non-violent? You funny guy, you. :lol:

just go back and read the thread :shrug:
you already admitted it no need to try and back peddal and save face now it wont work unless you can erase the op or admit you misspoke :shrug: lol
 
facts and the first post disagree with you

No they don't. I read the OP just to make certain.

hell even his owns words prove you wrong in post 478

LOL! You have got to be kidding. That is what initially made me realize how wrong you actually are.

sorry what he did as already been pointed out by other posters

Yea like AmericanWoman76, Medusa? Yea what a fine example.

the evidence before me is his own words, his own post and obviously people agree and pointed it out

People with very little credibility and even less honesty in my opinion.

he judged muslims/islam by the actions of a few, he let the actions of a few cast doubt on the group, sorry these facts and evidence are here in black and white LOL

The "group" cast doubts on the whole "religion of peace" thing before he said anything. His statements have nothing to do with judging a group and more to do with calling them out on bull****.

Period.
 
1.)No they don't. I read the OP just to make certain.



LOL! You have got to be kidding. That is what initially made me realize how wrong you actually are.



Yea like AmericanWoman76, Medusa? Yea what a fine example.



People with very little credibility and even less honesty in my opinion.



The "group" cast doubts on the whole "religion of peace" thing before he said anything. His statements have nothing to do with judging a group and more to do with calling them out on bull****.

Period.

1.) this is simply a lie, he judged a group based on some, HE even admitted this LMAO
2.) nope he admitted it
3.) nobody cares what americanwoman says lol
4.) you are free to have that opinion but his words, admittance still support the facts
5.) maybe thats what you THINK he said, or what he meant to say BUT he didnt :shrug: :D
 
Back
Top Bottom