Mr. Woodward wasn't threatened, Mr. Sperling explained himself. Davis and Fournier can offer no, zero, zip, nada proof of their claims of 'threats'. Mr. Woodward has spent his time in the limelight talking about himself and not the story that sparked the exchange.
The right wing blogisphere is all foamed up as the hyperpartisans are beside themselves... (I loved a partisan hack in another thread already whipping out the liberal pathology tripe)
Now dog references are wasted on me, I wore dog tags and was called a line doggy. You are not going to upset my cheery disposition.
2. Again, who the hell cares about Davis or Fournier. Deflection doesn't become you.
3. The story that sparked the exchange was ALREADY in the news...did you miss it?
4. There you go with your stereotypes again.
Are you happy now? I just refuted every one of your points...except the dumb one about your military service. Why should I care about that?
I don't think I have posted any remarks about Scalia...one way or the other. In fact, I don't know anything about his bigoted remark. You could provide me with some info, maybe...however, I suggest you do it in a different thread. It would be a bit off-topic here, I think.