• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

White House threatens Bob Woodward

Being that only you and a couple of birthers
still cling to the notion that there was any threat from this whitehouse email so yeah... your argument has been blown to bits.

Birther ? Lol....

There are so many other legitimate issues to criticize your President over that his place of origin is irrelevant.

Please direct me and others here to the post where I declared he was "born in Kenya ".

So the best you can do in response to my earlier question is a ad hominum attack ?

That must be what you meant when you said you and others were "blowing my post to bits ".

I asked for proof and you called me " a birther ".....BOOM ! Lol.

FYI the only thing that post "blows to bits " is your credibillity.
 
Birther ? Lol....

There are so many other legitimate issues to criticize your President over that his place of origin is irrelevant.

Please direct me and others here to the post where I declared he was "born in Kenya ".

So the best you can do in response to my earlier question is a ad hominum attack ?

That must be what you meant when you said you and others were "blowing my post to bits ".

I asked for proof and you called me " a birther ".....BOOM ! Lol.

FYI the only thing that post "blows to bits " is your credibillity.

poweRob said:
only you and a couple of birthers

I didn't call you a birther. Never did. So there was no ad hom attack on you. Therefore there's no need for you to play the victim card simply because you lack reading comprehension.
 
I didn't call you a birther. Never did. So
there was no ad hom attack on you. Therefore there's no need for you to play the victim card simply because you lack reading comprehension.

First " Birther" is known to be a perjorative among your ilk, so imagined if I said " only you and a couple of morons " with no other context to make the distinction between you and the "morons".

And my reading comprehension is exceptional. It's so evolved that I could never be fooled into following your bankrupt ideology.
 
Woodward proved the Obama White House was lying about not proposing the sequester - which the Democrats now try to blame on the Republicans. He forced the White House to concede the lie is a lie and admit the truth.
 
First " Birther" is known to be a perjorative among your ilk, so imagined if I said " only you and a couple of morons " with no other context to make the distinction between you and the "morons".

And my reading comprehension is exceptional. It's so evolved that I could never be fooled into following your bankrupt ideology.
reading comprehension failure exposed:
Originally Posted by poweRob:
only you and a couple of birthers
notice that he did NOT say
only you and a couple of OTHER birthers
had he done so, then your argument would have basis
so, it appears there WAS
context to make the distinction between you and the "morons"
to use your own expression

debate point to powerRob and the loser would be you
 
reading comprehension failure exposed:


notice that he did NOT say
had he done so, then your argument would have basis
so, it appears there WAS to use your own expression

debate point to powerRob and the loser would be you

I love it when you leftist claim victory arbitrarily.

You have yet to write anything I guess worthy of self acclaim of total victory so your piggy backing on Robs post.

Lol...

You leftist need to ask yourself before preceding.....WWKD..

( What Would Krugman Do )
 
After the email was released, it's hardly a threat.

The exchange is very friendly.
 
Woodward proved the Obama White House was lying about not proposing the sequester - which the Democrats now try to blame on the Republicans. He forced the White House to concede the lie is a lie and admit the truth.

No he did not 'prove' the White House lied about the sequester. Woodward has failed in this most recent attempt to play the media.
 
No he did not 'prove' the White House lied about the sequester. Woodward has failed in this most recent attempt to play the media.

... okay ... use the word force instead of prove ... or shame ... whatever ... the WH admits it now ... good enough for the rest of us.
 
Back
Top Bottom