unconscionability of a contract that arises from the terms of the contract and esp. from terms that are found to be one-sided, unjust, or overly harsh
I would say a contract that forbids legal sexual contact is unjust and overly harsh to say the least..... but that is why I am asking. There are principles in contract law that protects the "weak" party.. in this case the woman against abuses of the "strong" party... you cant sign over your life for example and so on.
It is an interesting case to say the least.. and I hope it goes through the court system to get a clarification.