- Joined
- Mar 21, 2012
- Messages
- 40,615
- Reaction score
- 9,087
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Independent
Admittance of hearsay is wrong.He was innocent...right?
WTF?You have the true makings of a criminal trial lawyer...
:slapme:
Ok, two can play this game.
Obviously you don't have the makings to be any sort of lawyer.You have the true makings of a criminal trial lawyer...
It most certainly did not."Reason" in the context of "beyond a reasonable doubt" most certainly did prevail. That asshole is guilty as sin.
Convicting a person because they are an "asshole" is not reasonable.
Convicting a person on hearsay evidence is not reasonable.
Youre NOT here to bust my balls thankfully. ~ No I am not. Thankfully so.
HOW closely have you covered this trial? ~ Close enough.
Not sure you know what has happened or how this went down. ~ :doh
Do you know anyone on the jury? ~ Irrelevant. Don't need to, and I would be ashamed if I did.
Why do YOU feel this is not correct? ~ Admittance of hearsay evidence.