2) Supposition. Try using facts instead.
Maybe the hald the parents are paying is the half attributable to the mothers care, and not the babys. And I don't know why you claim that the majority of the costs are associated with the babys care. It's the mother who will require meds, anesthetics, etc. If healthy, the care for the baby is minimal.
What if it was old school days - the parents said she could have the baby, but she'd have to give it up for abortion?
Babies, as we all know, are massively expensive. Maybe the parents don't have the finances to pay for another baby.
Even if the boy's parents agree to pay for half of everything.....
What are the rights of the "grandparents" here?
Since they will foot a good deal of the finances for a child they did not want or agree to have?
Are they SOL simply because their child did something stupid?
So, once again, who is out there arguing that parents should be able to force their children to get abortions? Even the parents, as you claim, aren't out there arguing they should be able to, they are arguing that they never even did that.
Texas parents agree not to pressure teen to have abortion - CNN.com
You are making stuff up. Now please come up with a real instance of this happening.The parents have denied the allegations in the lawsuit and called the case baseless. Their attorney did not respond to requests from CNN for comment.